Alejandro Cazzulino1, Rikesh Gandhi2, Thaddeus Woodard2, Nissim Ackshota3, M Burhan Janjua4, Vincent Arlet2, Comron Saifi2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center at Tel-Hashomer, Tel-Aviv, Israel. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Mercy Health, Dallas, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This cross sectional study describes a "Soft Landing" strategy utilizing hooks for minimizing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF). The technique creates a gradual transition from a rigid segmental construct to unilateral hooks at the upper instrumented level and preservation of the soft tissue attachments on the contralateral side of the hooks. Authors devise a novel classification system for better grading of PJK severity. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients at a single institution received the "Soft Landing" technique. The proximal junctional angle was measured preoperatively and at last follow-up using standing 36-inch spinal radiographs. Changes in proximal junctional angle and rates of PJK and PJF were measured and used to create a novel classification system for evaluating and categorizing ASD patients postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 61.4 years, and 90% of patients were women. Average follow up was 2.2 years. The mean change in proximal junctional angle was 8° (SD 7.4°) with the majority of patients (53%) experiencing less than 10° and only 1 patients with proximal junctional angle over 20°. Four patients (10%) needed additional surgery for proximal extension of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) secondary to PJF. CONCLUSIONS: Soft Landing technique is a possibly effective treatment strategy to prevent PJK and PJF following ASD that requires further evaluation. The described classification system provides management framework for better grading of PJK. The "Soft Landing" technique warrants further comparison to other techniques currently used to prevent both PJK and failure. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: This cross sectional study describes a "Soft Landing" strategy utilizing hooks for minimizing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF). The technique creates a gradual transition from a rigid segmental construct to unilateral hooks at the upper instrumented level and preservation of the soft tissue attachments on the contralateral side of the hooks. Authors devise a novel classification system for better grading of PJK severity. METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients at a single institution received the "Soft Landing" technique. The proximal junctional angle was measured preoperatively and at last follow-up using standing 36-inch spinal radiographs. Changes in proximal junctional angle and rates of PJK and PJF were measured and used to create a novel classification system for evaluating and categorizing ASD patients postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 61.4 years, and 90% of patients were women. Average follow up was 2.2 years. The mean change in proximal junctional angle was 8° (SD 7.4°) with the majority of patients (53%) experiencing less than 10° and only 1 patients with proximal junctional angle over 20°. Four patients (10%) needed additional surgery for proximal extension of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) secondary to PJF. CONCLUSIONS: Soft Landing technique is a possibly effective treatment strategy to prevent PJK and PJF following ASD that requires further evaluation. The described classification system provides management framework for better grading of PJK. The "Soft Landing" technique warrants further comparison to other techniques currently used to prevent both PJK and failure. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Junseok Bae; Alexander A Theologis; Russell Strom; Bobby Tay; Shane Burch; Sigurd Berven; Praveen V Mummaneni; Dean Chou; Christopher P Ames; Vedat Deviren Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2017-11-03
Authors: Jingyan Yang; Marc Khalifé; Renaud Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Justin Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Douglas C Burton; Christopher P Ames; Gregory M Mundis; Richard Hostin; Shay Bess; Eric O Klineberg; Robert A A Hart; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Tobias Lange; Werner Schmoelz; Georg Gosheger; Martin Eichinger; Christian H Heinrichs; Albert Schulze Boevingloh; Tobias L Schulte Journal: Spine J Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Khaled M Kebaish; Christopher T Martin; Joseph R O'Brien; Ivan E LaMotta; Gabor D Voros; Stephen M Belkoff Journal: Spine J Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 4.166