Literature DB >> 24480964

Biomechanical risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a detailed numerical analysis of surgical instrumentation variables.

Marco Cammarata1, Carl-Éric Aubin, Xiaoyu Wang, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) through computer simulations and sensitivity analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To gain biomechanical knowledge on the risk of PJK and find surgical solutions to reduce the risks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJK is a pathological kyphotic deformity adjacent to the instrumentation. Clinical studies have documented its risk factors, but still little is known on how it is correlated with various individual instrumentation variables.
METHODS: Biomechanical spine models of 6 patients with adult scoliosis were developed, validated, and then used to perform 576 simulations, varying the proximal dissection procedure, the implant type at the upper instrumented vertebra, the sagittal rod curvature, and the proximal diameter of the proximal transition rods. Four biomechanical indices--the proximal junctional kyphotic angle, thoracic kyphosis, proximal flexion force, and proximal flexion moment--were assessed.
RESULTS: The bilateral complete facetectomy, the posterior ligaments resection, and the combination of both increased the proximal junctional kyphotic angle (respectively, by 10%, 28% and 53%) and the proximal flexion force (4%, 12%, and 22%) and moment (16%, 44%, and 83%). Compared with pedicle screws at upper instrumented vertebra, proximal transverse process hooks reduced the 3 biomechanical indices by approximately 26%. The use of proximal transition rods with reduced proximal diameter from 5.5 mm to 4 mm decreased the proximal junctional kyphotic angle (by 6%) and the proximal flexion force (4%) and moment (8%). The increase of the sagittal rod curvature from 10° to 20°, 30°, and 40° increased the proximal junctional kyphotic angle (by 6%, 13%, and 19%) and the proximal flexion force (3%, 7%, and 10%) and moment (9%, 18%, and 27%).
CONCLUSION: Preserving more posterior proximal intervertebral elements, the use of transition rods and transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra, and reducing the global sagittal rod curvature each decreased the 4 biomechanical indices that may be involved in PJK. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480964     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Cervical sagittal deformity develops after PJK in adult thoracolumbar deformity correction: radiographic analysis utilizing a novel global sagittal angular parameter, the CTPA.

Authors:  Themistocles Protopsaltis; Nicolas Bronsard; Alex Soroceanu; Jensen K Henry; Renaud Lafage; Justin Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure-diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Ngoc-Lam M Nguyen; Christopher Y Kong; Robert A Hart
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

3.  The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Tobias Peteler; Tamás F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Samuel K Cho; John I Shin; Yongjung J Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The mechanism in junctional failure of thoraco-lumbar fusions. Part I: Biomechanical analysis of mechanisms responsible of vertebral overstress and description of the cervical inclination angle (CIA).

Authors:  Jean-Charles Le Huec; Jonathon Richards; Andreas Tsoupras; Rachel Price; Amélie Léglise; Antonio A Faundez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity : Prevalence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis.

Authors:  B G Diebo; N V Shah; S G Stroud; C B Paulino; F J Schwab; V Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Do Current Recommendations for Upper Instrumented Vertebra Predict Shoulder Imbalance? An Attempted Validation of Level Selection for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Benjamin T Bjerke; Zoe B Cheung; Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter B Derman; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-27

8.  Degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients with proximal junctional kyphosis have lower muscularity, fatty degeneration at the lumbar area.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Yan Zeng; Zhongqiang Chen; Weishi Li; Xinling Zhang; Shuo Mai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Tracking Kinematic and Kinetic Measures of Sit to Stand using an Instrumented Spine Orthosis.

Authors:  Robert Peter Matthew; Sarah Seko; Jeannie Bailey; Ruzena Bajcsy; Jeffrey Lotz
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2018-07

10.  Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng-Yu Liu; Tao Wang; Si-Dong Yang; Hui Wang; Da-Long Yang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.