Literature DB >> 22986834

Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Richard Hostin1, Ian McCarthy, Michael OʼBrien, Shay Bess, Breton Line, Oheneba Boachie-Adjei, Doug Burton, Munish Gupta, Christopher Ames, Vedat Deviren, Khaled Kebaish, Christopher Shaffrey, Kirkham Wood, Robert Hart.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective series.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures (APJFs) after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Early proximal junctional failures above adult deformity constructs are a serious clinical problem; however, the incidence and nature of early APJFs remain unclear.
METHODS: A total of 1218 consecutive adult spinal deformity surgeries across 10 deformity centers were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the incidence and nature of APJF, defined as any of the following within 28 weeks of index procedure: minimum 15° post-operative increase in proximal junctional kyphosis, vertebral fracture of upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) or UIV + 1, failure of UIV fixation, or need for proximal extension of fusion within 6 months of surgery.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight APJF cases were identified out of 1218 consecutive surgeries (5.6%). Patients had a mean age of 63 years (range, 26-82 yr), mean fusion levels of 9.8 (range, 4-18), and mean time to APJF of 11.4 weeks (range, 1.5-28 wk). Fracture was the most common failure mode (47%), followed by soft-tissue failure (44%). Failures most often occurred in the thoracolumbar region (TL-APJF) compared with the upper thoracic region (UT-APJF), with 66% of patients experiencing TL-APJF compared with 34% experiencing UT-APJF. Fracture was significantly more common for TL-APJF relative to UT-APJF (P = 0.00), whereas soft-tissue failure was more common for UT-APJF (P < 0.02). Patients experiencing TL-APJF were also older (P = 0.00), had fewer fusion levels (P = 0.00), and had worse postoperative sagittal vertical axis (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: APJFs were identified in 5.6% of patients undergoing surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity, with failures occurring primarily in the TL region of the spine. There is evidence that the mode of failure differs depending on the location of UIV, with TL failures more likely due to fracture and UT failures more likely due to soft-tissue failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22986834     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318271319c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Virtually bloodless posterior midline exposure of the lumbar spine using the "para-midline" fatty plane.

Authors:  Michael H Moghimi; Dana A Leonard; Charles H Cho; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Philippe Phan; Mitchel B Harris; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical sagittal deformity develops after PJK in adult thoracolumbar deformity correction: radiographic analysis utilizing a novel global sagittal angular parameter, the CTPA.

Authors:  Themistocles Protopsaltis; Nicolas Bronsard; Alex Soroceanu; Jensen K Henry; Renaud Lafage; Justin Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Temporary fusionless posterior occipitocervical fixation for a proximal junctional type II odontoid fracture after previous C2-pelvis fusion: case report, description of a new surgical technique, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; Vedat Deviren; Bobby Tay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure-diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Ngoc-Lam M Nguyen; Christopher Y Kong; Robert A Hart
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

5.  The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Tobias Peteler; Tamás F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Samuel K Cho; John I Shin; Yongjung J Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The mechanism in junctional failure of thoraco-lumbar fusions. Part I: Biomechanical analysis of mechanisms responsible of vertebral overstress and description of the cervical inclination angle (CIA).

Authors:  Jean-Charles Le Huec; Jonathon Richards; Andreas Tsoupras; Rachel Price; Amélie Léglise; Antonio A Faundez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult scoliosis: comparison of four radiological predictor models.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Guillaume Riouallon; Ibrahim Obeid; Pierre Grobost; Maroun Rizkallah; Fethi Laouissat; Yann-Phillippe Charles; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives.

Authors:  V Arlet; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Distal junctional failure secondary to L5 vertebral fracture-a report of two rare cases.

Authors:  Jiong Hao Tan; Kimberly-Anne Tan; Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.