Literature DB >> 33828956

Reliability of panoramic radiography in predicting proximity of third molars to the mandibular canal: A comparison using cone-beam computed tomography.

Willy James Porto Nunes1, Aline Lisboa Vieira1, Letícia Drumond de Abreu Guimarães2, Carlos Eduardo Pinto de Alcântara3, Francielle Silvestre Verner4, Matheus Furtado de Carvalho3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability of 7 panoramic radiographic signs for predicting proximity of the root apices of mandibular third molars to the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography and to correlate these findings with the Pell and Gregory and the Winter classification systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted on 74 patients with bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Four panoramic radiographic signs were observed in the tooth root (darkening, deflection, and narrowing of the root apices, and bifid apices), and another 3 in the mandibular canal (diversion, narrowing, and interruption of the mandibular canal). Cone-beam computed tomography images were analyzed to identify disruption and diversion of the mandibular canal and root deflection.
RESULTS: Binary logistic regression showed that only 4 of the 7 panoramic radiographic signs were able to predict proximity of the root apices of the mandibular third molars to the mandibular canal: darkening of the root, deflection of the root, narrowing of the root, and interruption of the mandibular canal (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Darkening, deflection, and narrowing of the root, in tandem with the interruption of the mandibular canal on panoramic radiographs, indicate that cone-beam computed tomography should be performed when planning the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Proximity between mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal is correlated with the Winter classification.
Copyright © 2021 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone-beam Computed Tomography; Mandibular Nerve; Radiography, Panoramic; Third Molar

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828956      PMCID: PMC8007391          DOI: 10.5624/isd.20200095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent        ISSN: 2233-7822


  21 in total

Review 1.  Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mansur Ahmad; J Jenny; M Downie
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.291

2.  Correlation between radiographic signs of third molar proximity with inferior alveolar nerve and postoperative occurrence of neurosensory disorders: a prospective, double-blind study.

Authors:  Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa; Erick Helton Lima Fontenele; Tácio Pinheiro Bezerra; Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro; Bárbara Gressy Duarte Souza Carneiro; Eduardo Costa Studart Soares
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.388

3.  Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Olivia Nackaerts; Jilke Beinsberger; Keith Horner; Joseph Schoenaers; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 4.  Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group study.

Authors:  F A Carmichael; D A McGowan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Ana Cláudia Amorim Gomes; Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos; Emanuel Dias de Oliveira Silva; Arnaldo de França Caldas; Ivo Cavalcante Pita Neto
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction?

Authors:  Jin-Woo Kim; In-Ho Cha; Sun-Jong Kim; Myung-Rae Kim
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Keisuke Nakayama; Makoto Nonoyama; Yasuo Takaki; Toyohiro Kagawa; Kenji Yuasa; Kiwako Izumi; Satoru Ozeki; Tetsuro Ikebe
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.

Authors:  J P Rood; B A Shehab
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 9.  Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Carter; S Worthington
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Role of Panoramic Imaging and Cone Beam CT for Assessment of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Exposure and Subsequent Paresthesia Following Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.

Authors:  Sonali Ghai; Sankarsan Choudhury
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-06-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors for external root resorption of maxillary second molars associated with third molars.

Authors:  Jinwoo Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-05-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.