Literature DB >> 29618893

Role of Panoramic Imaging and Cone Beam CT for Assessment of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Exposure and Subsequent Paresthesia Following Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar.

Sonali Ghai1,2, Sankarsan Choudhury3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of impacted mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar canal (IAC) is important in preventing a possible nerve exposure and damage during surgical removal. The present study analysed the relation of the mandibular third molar with inferior alveolar canal using panoramic radiography (PAN) and cone beam CT (CBCT) and evaluated the radiographic features suggestive of IAN exposure and post-operative paresthesia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PAN and CBCT findings of 53 impacted mandibular third molars having a close relation with IAC undergoing extraction were analysed. Further, all cases were evaluated for any sensory loss in relation to IAN 1 week post-operatively.
RESULTS: The most common PAN feature was combination of darkening of roots (DR) and interruption of white line (IWL), seen in 35.86% (19) cases. The most common CBCT feature was thinning of lingual cortex in 81.14% (43) cases. The most common location of IAC in CBCT was inferior in 47.16% (25) cases, followed by buccal 26.41% (14). On comparison of PAN and CBCT findings, DR and IWL both exclusively 92.86% (13); 80% (12) cases and in combination 75% (15) were most commonly associated with thinning of lingual cortex. IAN exposure was seen in 7.55% (4) cases, and 3.77% (2) cases reported with paresthesia. Absence of corticalisation and IWL was associated with all cases of nerve exposure, inter-radicular location of IAC seen in three out of the four cases. Cases with paresthesia had DR and deflection of roots (DEFR) with thinning of lingual cortex by roots.
CONCLUSION: DR with DEFR or IWL in PAN as combination and inter-radicular location of IAC with thinning of lingual cortex by root tips in CBCT are highly predictive of nerve exposure and subsequent paresthesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam computed tomography; IAN exposure; IAN paresthesia; Impacted mandibular third molars; Panoramic radiography

Year:  2017        PMID: 29618893      PMCID: PMC5878169          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-017-1026-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  19 in total

1.  Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  F S Neves; T C Souza; S M Almeida; F Haiter-Neto; D Q Freitas; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction.

Authors:  Michael Sedaghatfar; Meredith A August; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.

Authors:  Weeraya Tantanapornkul; Kiyoshi Okouchi; Yoshikuni Fujiwara; Masashi Yamashiro; Yutaka Maruoka; Naoto Ohbayashi; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-09-01

Review 4.  New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  S Patel
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 5.  Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

7.  The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique.

Authors:  W P Smith
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-08-22

8.  The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.

Authors:  J P Rood; B A Shehab
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Andrew Ban Guan Tay; Wee Ser Go
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of the relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted class C mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Zahra Dalili; Porousha Mahjoub; Ali Khalighi Sigaroudi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-10
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veronica Caroline Brito Reia; Gabriel de Toledo Telles-Araujo; Mariela Peralta-Mamani; Mariel Ruivo Biancardi; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Reliability of panoramic radiography in predicting proximity of third molars to the mandibular canal: A comparison using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Willy James Porto Nunes; Aline Lisboa Vieira; Letícia Drumond de Abreu Guimarães; Carlos Eduardo Pinto de Alcântara; Francielle Silvestre Verner; Matheus Furtado de Carvalho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 3.  Management and prevention of third molar surgery-related trigeminal nerve injury: time for a rethink.

Authors:  Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Diversion of the mandibular canal: Is it the best predictor of inferior alveolar nerve damage during mandibular third molar surgery on panoramic radiographs?

Authors:  Melek Tassoker
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2019-09-24

5.  Comparison of Digital OPG and CBCT in Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Inferior Nerve Injury during Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.

Authors:  Rakhi Issrani; Namdeo Prabhu; Mohammed Sghaireen; Hasna Rasheed Alshubrmi; Amal Mohamed Alanazi; Zainab Ali Alkhalaf; Mohammed Odhayd Alnusayri; Fahad Muqbil Aljohani; Zafar A Khan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.