Literature DB >> 22901857

Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction?

Jin-Woo Kim1, In-Ho Cha, Sun-Jong Kim, Myung-Rae Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mandibular third molar extraction is a commonly performed procedure and is recognized as a relatively frequent cause of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate the specific risk factors for neurosensory deficits, including age, gender, impaction depth, angulation of the third molar, and various radiographic superimposition signs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a case-control study of patients who had undergone mandibular third molar extraction, a case group was developed of patients showing neurosensory deficits of the IAN, and a control group was formed of randomly selected patients without any neurosensory symptoms. Bivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between each variable and IAN injury. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to compute the odds ratios, P values, and predictive values of the radiographic superimposition signs.
RESULTS: Of 12,842 total patients, the study group included 104 cases and 135 controls. The results indicated that older age and deeper impaction status were significant risk factors (P < .05). Darkening of the roots, deflection of the roots, narrowing of the roots, dark and bifid apexes of the roots, and narrowing of the canal were also significant risk factors. The positive predictive values ranged from 0.7% to 6.9% and the negative predictive values from 99% to 100%, with adjustment for the definitive prevalence of IAN injury (0.81%, 104/12,842 patients). However, the relatively low positive predictive value renders questionable the predictability of superimposition signs on orthopantomography. In the absence of specific radiographic signs, the risk of neurosensory deficit of the IAN could be negligible. The sensory symptoms disappeared after 6 months in 92.3% of the patients and 98.1% showed recovery after 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have demonstrated a significant association between several risk factors and neurosensory deficits of the IAN after third molar extraction. With a case group of 104 patients, the number of subjects was significantly greater than that in previous studies, increasing the reliability of these results.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901857     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  20 in total

1.  A multivariate statistical analysis on variables affecting inferior alveolar nerve damage during third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Pippi; M Santoro
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Objectivity and reliability of panoramic radiographic signs of intimate relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar nerve.

Authors:  Mohammad Zandi; Abbas Shokri; Ali Heidari; Elham Masoud Peykar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-22

Review 3.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Before and after. Part 2: the removal of third molars.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Risk stratification against inferior alveolar nerve injury after lower third molar extraction by scoring on cone-beam computed tomography image.

Authors:  Seiko Kubota; Tomoaki Imai; Mitsuhiro Nakazawa; Narikazu Uzawa
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Reasons why erupted third molars are extracted in a public university in Mexico.

Authors:  C E Medina-Solís; M Mendoza-Rodríguez; S Márquez-Rodríguez; R De la Rosa-Santillana; R Islas-Zarazua; J-D J Navarrete-Hernández; G Maupomé
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 0.171

6.  Significance of radiological variables studied on orthopantamogram to pridict post-operative inferior alveoler nerve paresthesia after third molar extraction.

Authors:  Sachin Pathak; Nitin Mishra; Madhur Kant Rastogi; Shalini Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

Review 7.  Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamori; Kei Tomihara; Makoto Noguchi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

8.  Nerve Injury After Surgical Excision of Mandibular Third Molars Under Local Anesthesia: An Audit.

Authors:  Ashok Ramadorai; Andrew B G Tay; Gayathri Vasanthakumar; W K Lye
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-09-19

9.  Can narrowing of the mandibular canal on pre-operative panoramic radiography predict close anatomical contact of the mandibular canal with the mandibular third molar? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qin Liye; Zhou Zhongwei; Sun Xiaojuan; Wang Min; Liu Pingping; Cao Kun
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Preoperative Anatomic Evaluation of the Relationship Between Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal and Impacted Mandibular Third Molar in a Population of Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Using CBCT: A Hospital-Based Study.

Authors:  Rajat Mohanty; Purnendu Rout; Vaibhav Singh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.