Literature DB >> 26561441

Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

K Carter1, S Worthington2.   

Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of third molar (M3) impaction worldwide in individuals ≥17 y, from either sex, who had undergone oral radiography and presented with no orofacial syndromes or defects. We performed a literature search using PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar and retrieved English and non-English articles from any period for review. We included studies reporting M3 impaction prevalence based on radiographic examination. Risk of bias was assessed regarding individuals with craniofacial syndromes, prior extraction of permanent teeth, multiple effect size estimates, and studies conflating lack of eruption with impaction. Our search yielded 49 studies involving 83,484 individuals. Worldwide M3 impaction prevalence was found to be 24.40% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 18.97% to 30.80%). The odds of M3 impaction in the mandible were 57.58% (95% CI: 43.3% to 68.3%, P < 0.0001) higher than in the maxilla, but we did not detect any difference in the odds of impaction between men and women (18.62%, 95% CI: -4.9% to 48.0%, P = 0.12). Mesioangular impaction was most common (41.17%, 95% CI: 33.8% to 49.0%), followed by vertical (25.55%, 95% CI: 20.0% to 32.0%), distoangular (12.17%, 95% CI: 9.1% to 16.0%), and horizontal (11.06%, 95% CI: 8.3% to 14.6%). Impaction of 1 (42.71%, 95% CI: 30.0% to 56.5%) or 2 (29.64%, 95% CI: 19.5% to 42.3%) M3s was much more common than 3 (12.04%, 95% CI: 7.2% to 19.3%) or 4 (8.74%, 95% CI: 5.2% to 14.5%). There were small differences among impaction prevalence depending on geographic region (F test, P = 0.049). Selection bias was evident because individuals had to undergo radiographic examination to be included in the analysis. The subgroup analysis by sex was underpowered. Worldwide M3 impaction prevalence is lower than previously reported. The percentage of individuals with impacted M3s is much smaller than the percentage that undergoes clinical treatment for M3 problems. © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; dentition; mandible; maxilla; population; sex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26561441     DOI: 10.1177/0022034515615857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  30 in total

1.  Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Juliet Hounsome; Gerlinde Pilkington; James Mahon; Angela Boland; Sophie Beale; Eleanor Kotas; Tara Renton; Rumona Dickson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Radiographic study of mandibular third molars: evaluation of the position and root anatomy in Brazilian population.

Authors:  Marcelo Bonifácio da Silva Sampieri; Francisca Lívia Parente Viana; Camila Lopes Cardoso; Márcia Ferreira Vasconcelos; Maria Helena Ferreira Vasconcelos; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-15

Review 3.  Cross-Sectional Imaging of Third Molar-Related Abnormalities.

Authors:  R M Loureiro; D V Sumi; H L V C Tames; S P P Ribeiro; C R Soares; R L E Gomes; M M Daniel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Diseases associated with mandibular third molar teeth.

Authors:  L W McArdle; M Andiappan; I Khan; J Jones; F McDonald
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Influence of operator's professional experience in the postoperative course after surgical extrac-tion of the impacted lower third molar: A pilot study.

Authors:  Juan-Antonio Ruiz-Roca; Benjamin Donoso-Martínez; Susana Ameneiros-Serantes; Yolanda Martínez-Beneyto; Diego Salmerón-Martínez; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-09-01

6.  Legal age determined by a new threshold value of third molar maturity index in subjects with impacted mandibular third molars: An orthopantomographic study in south Indian adolescents.

Authors:  Sudheer Babu Balla; Nandha Krishna Nambi; Saravanan Nambi; Bhavana Chinnala; Manasa Bojji; Asa Priyanka Mula; Subhashini Kondakamalli; Deepika Vankdoth; Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Does listening to music reduce anxiety and pain in third molar surgery?-a systematic review.

Authors:  João Luiz Gomes Carneiro Monteiro; Davi da Silva Barbirato; Sandra Lúcia Dantas Moraes; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.606

8.  Prevalence of Mandibular Third Molars According to the Pell & Gregory and Winter Classifications.

Authors:  Karina Kendelhy Santos; Frederico Santos Lages; César Alexandre Barroso Maciel; José Cristiano Ramos Glória; Dhelfeson Willya Douglas-de-Oliveira
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-26

9.  Sutureless socket technique after removal of third molars: a multicentric, open, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Takadoum; Grégory Douilly; Marie de Boutray; Sarah Kabani; Eric Maladière; Christophe Demattei; Philippe Lapeyrie
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.747

10.  Reliability of panoramic radiography in predicting proximity of third molars to the mandibular canal: A comparison using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Willy James Porto Nunes; Aline Lisboa Vieira; Letícia Drumond de Abreu Guimarães; Carlos Eduardo Pinto de Alcântara; Francielle Silvestre Verner; Matheus Furtado de Carvalho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.