Literature DB >> 33827613

Evaluating the cerebrospinal fluid tap test with the Hellström iNPH scale for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Johanna Rydja1, Andreas Eleftheriou2, Fredrik Lundin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CSF TT) is used for selecting shunt surgery candidates among patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the CSF TT, by using the Hellström iNPH scale for shunted iNPH patients with a standardized method.
METHODS: One hundred and sixteen shunt-operated iNPH patients were retrospectively included in this study. The gait and balance domains in the iNPH scale were used as outcome measures for the CSF TT and the total iNPH scale score as the postoperative outcome. A positive response to CSF TT was defined as a change of ≥ 5 points in the gait domain and ≥ 16 points in the balance domain. Differences between CSF TT responders and non-responders, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and correlations between changes from baseline to post CSF TT and from baseline to the postoperative follow-up, were calculated.
RESULTS: In the CSF TT there were 63.8% responders in the gait domain and correspondingly 44.3% in the balance domain. CSF TT responders had a significantly better postoperative outcome in the total scale score (gait P ≤ 0.001, balance P ≤ 0.012) and gait CSF TT responders improved more in gait (P ≤ 0.001) and balance CSF TT responders in balance (P ≤ 0.001). No differences between CSF TT gait or balance responders could be found in neuropsychological or urinary continence assessments postoperatively. The sensitivity and specificity of the CSF TT and the outcome of the total iNPH scale score postoperatively were 68.1% and 52.0% for gait and 47.8% and 68.0% for balance, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The CSF TT, with the Hellström iNPH scale as the outcome measure, has clear limitations in predicting postoperative results. The gait domain may be used to predict outcomes for gait, but the balance domain is too insensitive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF TT; Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; Outcome; Sensitivity; Specificity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33827613     DOI: 10.1186/s12987-021-00252-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS        ISSN: 2045-8118


  20 in total

1.  Supplementary Tests in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Single-Center Experience with a Combined Lumbar Infusion Test and Tap Test.

Authors:  Fabio Raneri; Maria Angela Samis Zella; Andrea Di Cristofori; Barbara Zarino; Mauro Pluderi; Diego Spagnoli
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 2.  Subgroup analysis and covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrían V Hernández; Ewout W Steyerberg; Gillian S Taylor; Anthony Marmarou; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF Tap Test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Carsten Wikkelsø; Per Hellström; Petra Margarete Klinge; Jos Th J Tans
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: the CSF tap-test may predict the clinical response to shunting.

Authors:  T Sand; G Bovim; R Grimse; G Myhr; G Helde; J Cappelen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  B Kahlon; G Sundbärg; S Rehncrona
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 6.  Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients.

Authors:  Petra Klinge; Anthony Marmarou; Marvin Bergsneider; Norman Relkin; Peter McL Black
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Lisa D Ravdin; Heather L Katzen; Anna E Jackson; Diamanto Tsakanikas; Stephanie Assuras; Norman R Relkin
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Predictive value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap-test.

Authors:  C Wikkelsö; H Andersson; C Blomstrand; G Lindqvist; P Svendsen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition.

Authors:  Etsuro Mori; Masatsune Ishikawa; Takeo Kato; Hiroaki Kazui; Hiroji Miyake; Masakazu Miyajima; Madoka Nakajima; Masaaki Hashimoto; Nagato Kuriyama; Takahiko Tokuda; Kazunari Ishii; Mitsunobu Kaijima; Yoshihumi Hirata; Makoto Saito; Hajime Arai
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Influence of comorbidities in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus - research and clinical care. A report of the ISHCSF task force on comorbidities in INPH.

Authors:  Jan Malm; Neill R Graff-Radford; Masatsune Ishikawa; Bo Kristensen; Ville Leinonen; Etsuro Mori; Brian K Owler; Mats Tullberg; Michael A Williams; Norman R Relkin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2013-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.