Literature DB >> 18359152

Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Lisa D Ravdin1, Heather L Katzen, Anna E Jackson, Diamanto Tsakanikas, Stephanie Assuras, Norman R Relkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify components of gait associated with a positive tap test (TT) in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with iNPH underwent clinical evaluation pre- and post-TT and were classified as responders (Rs) or non-responders (NRs). Elements of gait were assessed with a formal standardized Gait Scale and compared between groups.
RESULTS: Analysis of pre/post-TT group differences revealed an interaction for Total Gait Score and Walking Score, with improvements in responders only. Total Gait Scores improved by 29% in the Rs and 4.85% in the NRs. Rs showed significant post-TT improvements on a timed 10m walk, turning, and balance. Tandem walking, turning, truck balance and start stop hesitation showed trends toward improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The classic features of gait often used in determining diagnosis of NPH (wide based stride, reduced foot-floor clearance, and small steps) were not helpful in identifying responders to the TT. Walking speed, steps for turning, and tendency towards falling were most likely to improve post-TT. These straightforward measures can readily be adapted into clinical practice to assist in determination of shunt candidacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18359152      PMCID: PMC2690636          DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  24 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  J A Vanneste
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus: survey on contemporary diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

Authors:  J K Krauss; B Halve
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Adult idiopathic communicating hydrocephalus with and without shunting.

Authors:  C P Hughes; B A Siegel; W S Coxe; M H Gado; R L Grubb; R E Coleman; L Berg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome.

Authors:  A O Hebb; M D Cusimano
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  B Kahlon; G Sundbärg; S Rehncrona
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics.

Authors:  S Hakim; R D Adams
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1965 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Predictors of outcome in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Ullrich Meier; Alexander König; Christoph Miethke
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 8.  Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review.

Authors:  J Vanneste; P Augustijn; C Dirven; W F Tan; Z D Goedhart
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with th idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome.

Authors:  J Malm; B Kristensen; T Karlsson; M Fagerlund; J Elfverson; J Ekstedt
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1995-08

10.  Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly.

Authors:  C M Fisher
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  17 in total

1.  Assessment of response to cerebrospinal fluid tap test for normal pressure hydrocephalus: how we do it.

Authors:  Christopher Nnaemeka Osuafor; Lorraine Kyne
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-08-16

2.  Changes in sensorimotor-related thalamic diffusion properties and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics predict gait responses to tap test in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Ping-Huei Tsai; Yung-Chieh Chen; Shih-Wei Chiang; Teng-Yi Huang; Ming-Chung Chou; Hua-Shan Liu; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Giia-Sheun Peng; Hsin-I Ma; Hung-Wen Kao; Cheng-Yu Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus-an overview of pathophysiological mechanisms and diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Petr Skalický; Arnošt Mládek; Aleš Vlasák; Patricia De Lacy; Vladimír Beneš; Ondřej Bradáč
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Structural volumetry in NPH diagnostics and treatment-future or dead end?

Authors:  Aleš Vlasák; Petr Skalický; Arnošt Mládek; Jiří Vrána; Vladimír Beneš; Ondřej Bradáč
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Protocolizing the Workup for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Improves Outcomes.

Authors:  Lealani Mae Y Acosta; Kassandra Stubblefield; Trisha Conwell; Kiersten Espaillat; Heather Koons; Peter Konrad; John Fang; Howard Kirshner; Thomas Davis
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08

6.  Gait dysfunction in Parkinson's disease and normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.

Authors:  Paulo Bugalho; Luísa Alves; Rita Miguel
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Shigeki Yamada; Masatsune Ishikawa; Masakazu Miyajima; Madoka Nakajima; Masamichi Atsuchi; Teruo Kimura; Takahiko Tokuda; Hiroaki Kazui; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2017-04

8.  Quantitative Evaluation of Gait Changes Using APDM Inertial Sensors After the External Lumbar Drain in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Mengmeng He; Zhenyu Qi; Yunxiang Shao; Hui Yao; Xuewen Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yu Shi; Qinzhi E; Chengming Liu; Hongwei Hu; Jiangang Liu; Xiaoou Sun; Zhong Wang; Yulun Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (Third Edition): Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Madoka Nakajima; Shigeki Yamada; Masakazu Miyajima; Kazunari Ishii; Nagato Kuriyama; Hiroaki Kazui; Hideki Kanemoto; Takashi Suehiro; Kenji Yoshiyama; Masahiro Kameda; Yoshinaga Kajimoto; Mitsuhito Mase; Hisayuki Murai; Daisuke Kita; Teruo Kimura; Naoyuki Samejima; Takahiko Tokuda; Mitsunobu Kaijima; Chihiro Akiba; Kaito Kawamura; Masamichi Atsuchi; Yoshihumi Hirata; Mitsunori Matsumae; Makoto Sasaki; Fumio Yamashita; Shigeki Aoki; Ryusuke Irie; Hiroji Miyake; Takeo Kato; Etsuro Mori; Masatsune Ishikawa; Isao Date; Hajime Arai
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Shunt-responsive idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patient with delayed improvement after tap test.

Authors:  Kyunghun Kang; Sung Kyoo Hwang; Ho-Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.