Literature DB >> 23250963

The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF Tap Test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Carsten Wikkelsø1, Per Hellström, Petra Margarete Klinge, Jos Th J Tans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the CSF Tap Test (CSF TT) and resistance to CSF outflow (Rout) for the outcome of shunting in a sample of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
METHODS: 115 patients were included in this European multicentre study. Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms and signs, and MRI changes. All patients were treated with programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts and re-examined 12 months after surgery. Outcomes were measures with a newly developed iNPH Scale and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Before surgery, a CSF TT and measurement of Rout was performed, with the results blinded to all caregivers. The 12 month outcome was correlated with Rout and the result of the CSF TT.
RESULTS: Rout and the results of the CSF TT showed no correlation with outcome measured by either domain, or with total iNPH score or mRS score. Only an increase in the gait task (10 m of walking at free speed) of the CSF TT correlated significantly (r=0.22, p=0.02) with improvement in iNPH score. The positive predictive value of both tests was >90% and the negative predictive value <20%. Rout >12 had an overall accuracy of 65% and the CSF TT 53%. Combining both tests did not improve their predictive power. No correlation was found between Rout and the results of the CSF TT.
CONCLUSIONS: Rout and the results of the CSF TT did not correlate with outcome after 12 months. Rout and CSF TT can be used for selecting patients for shunt surgery but not for excluding patients from treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT00874198.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23250963     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  50 in total

Review 1.  Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  John J Halperin; Roger Kurlan; Jason M Schwalb; Michael D Cusimano; Gary Gronseth; David Gloss
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral perfusion measured with pCASL before and repeatedly after CSF removal.

Authors:  Johan Virhammar; Katarina Laurell; André Ahlgren; Kristina Giuliana Cesarini; Elna-Marie Larsson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  DTI-MRI biomarkers in the search for normal pressure hydrocephalus aetiology: a review.

Authors:  David Hoza; Aleš Vlasák; Daniel Hořínek; Martin Sameš; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  iNPH with parkinsonism: response to lumbar CSF drainage and ventriculoperitoneal shunting.

Authors:  Giovanni Mostile; Giacomo Portaro; Francesco Certo; Antonina Luca; Roberta Manna; Roberta Terranova; Roberto Altieri; Alessandra Nicoletti; Giuseppe Maria Vincenzo Barbagallo; Mario Zappia
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Normal pressure hydrocephalus-an overview of pathophysiological mechanisms and diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Petr Skalický; Arnošt Mládek; Aleš Vlasák; Patricia De Lacy; Vladimír Beneš; Ondřej Bradáč
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Does Phase-Contrast Imaging through the Cerebral Aqueduct Predict the Outcome of Lumbar CSF Drainage or Shunt Surgery in Patients with Suspected Adult Hydrocephalus?

Authors:  A M Blitz; J Shin; O Balédent; G Pagé; L W Bonham; D A Herzka; A R Moghekar; D Rigamonti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Optimal Diagnostic Indices for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Based on the 3D Quantitative Volumetric Analysis for the Cerebral Ventricle and Subarachnoid Space.

Authors:  S Yamada; M Ishikawa; K Yamamoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Acute two-compartment low pressure hydrocephalus--a case report.

Authors:  M Preuß; P Evangelou; W Hirsch; M Reiss-Zimmermann; L Fischer; A Merkenschlager; W Kieß; M Siekmeyer; J Meixensberger; U Nestler
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Differentiating shunt-responsive normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer disease and normal aging: pilot study using automated MRI brain tissue segmentation.

Authors:  Yafell Serulle; Henry Rusinek; Ivan I Kirov; Hannah Milch; Els Fieremans; Alexander B Baxter; John McMenamy; Rajan Jain; Jeffrey Wisoff; James Golomb; Oded Gonen; Ajax E George
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Michael A Williams; Jan Malm
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.