BACKGROUND: Non-invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure-strain loops (PSLs), which are generated by combining LV longitudinal strain with brachial artery blood pressure, provide a novel method of quantifying global and segmental myocardial work (MW) indices with potential advantages over conventional echocardiographic strain data, which suffers from being load-dependent. This method has been recently introduced in echocardiographic software, enhancing the efficiency of MW calculations. This study aimed to evaluate the role of non-invasive MW indices derived from LV PSLs in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. METHODS: A total of 106 heart failure (HF) patients scheduled for CRT were included in the MW analysis. Global and segmental (septal and lateral at the mid-ventricular level) MW indices were assessed before CRT and at a 6-month follow-up. Response to CRT was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume and ≥1 NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. RESULTS: CRT response was observed in 78 (74%) patients. At baseline, the global work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) were significantly higher in CRT responders than in non-responders (both P<0.05). Furthermore, responders exhibited significantly higher mid lateral MW and mid lateral constructive work (CW) (both P<0.001), but significantly lower mid septal MWI and mid septal myocardial work efficiency (MWE) than non-responders (all P<0.01). Baseline mid septal MWE (OR 0.975, 95% CI: 0.959-0.990, P=0.002) and mid lateral MWI (OR 1.003, 95% CI: 1.002-1.004, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CRT response in multivariate regression analysis. Mid septal MWE ≤42% combined with mid lateral MWI ≥740 mmHg% predicted CRT response, with an optimal sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 82% [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.830, P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of MW indices before CRT could identify the marked imbalance in LV MW distribution and can be widely used as a reliable complementary tool for guiding patient selection for CRT in clinical practice. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure-strain loops (PSLs), which are generated by combining LV longitudinal strain with brachial artery blood pressure, provide a novel method of quantifying global and segmental myocardial work (MW) indices with potential advantages over conventional echocardiographic strain data, which suffers from being load-dependent. This method has been recently introduced in echocardiographic software, enhancing the efficiency of MW calculations. This study aimed to evaluate the role of non-invasive MW indices derived from LV PSLs in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. METHODS: A total of 106 heart failure (HF) patients scheduled for CRT were included in the MW analysis. Global and segmental (septal and lateral at the mid-ventricular level) MW indices were assessed before CRT and at a 6-month follow-up. Response to CRT was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume and ≥1 NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline. RESULTS: CRT response was observed in 78 (74%) patients. At baseline, the global work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) were significantly higher in CRT responders than in non-responders (both P<0.05). Furthermore, responders exhibited significantly higher mid lateral MW and mid lateral constructive work (CW) (both P<0.001), but significantly lower mid septal MWI and mid septal myocardial work efficiency (MWE) than non-responders (all P<0.01). Baseline mid septal MWE (OR 0.975, 95% CI: 0.959-0.990, P=0.002) and mid lateral MWI (OR 1.003, 95% CI: 1.002-1.004, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CRT response in multivariate regression analysis. Mid septal MWE ≤42% combined with mid lateral MWI ≥740 mmHg% predicted CRT response, with an optimal sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 82% [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.830, P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of MW indices before CRT could identify the marked imbalance in LV MW distribution and can be widely used as a reliable complementary tool for guiding patient selection for CRT in clinical practice. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Gabe B Bleeker; Jeroen J Bax; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Ernst E van der Wall; Qing Zhang; Martin J Schalij; Joseph Yat-Sun Chan; Cheuk-Man Yu Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Alexander H Maass; Kevin Vernooy; Sofieke C Wijers; Jetske van 't Sant; Maarten J Cramer; Mathias Meine; Cornelis P Allaart; Frederik J De Lange; Frits W Prinzen; Bart Gerritse; Erna Erdtsieck; Coert O S Scheerder; Michael R S Hill; Marcoen Scholten; Mariëlle Kloosterman; Iris A H Ter Horst; Adriaan A Voors; Marc A Vos; Michiel Rienstra; Isabelle C Van Gelder Journal: Europace Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Eugene S Chung; Angel R Leon; Luigi Tavazzi; Jing-Ping Sun; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John Merlino; William T Abraham; Stefano Ghio; Christophe Leclercq; Jeroen J Bax; Cheuk-Man Yu; John Gorcsan; Martin St John Sutton; Johan De Sutter; Jaime Murillo Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Angelo Auricchio; Cecilia Fantoni; Francois Regoli; Corrado Carbucicchio; Andreas Goette; Christoph Geller; Michael Kloss; Helmut Klein Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John Gorcsan; Theodore Abraham; Deborah A Agler; Jeroen J Bax; Genevieve Derumeaux; Richard A Grimm; Randy Martin; Jonathan S Steinberg; Martin St John Sutton; Cheuk-Man Yu Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: J Vecera; M Penicka; M Eriksen; K Russell; J Bartunek; M Vanderheyden; O A Smiseth Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Felix Sebastian Oberhoffer; Hashim Abdul-Khaliq; Anna-Maria Jung; Michael Zemlin; Tilman R Rohrer; Mohamed Abd El Rahman Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2020-01
Authors: Fei Ren; Ting Xue; Ge Tang; Man Zhang; Jing Zhao; Yun'An Chen; Jixu Fan; Ming Yu; Jie Zhang Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 2.809