Literature DB >> 33816178

The value of non-invasive myocardial work indices derived from left ventricular pressure-strain loops in predicting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Mengruo Zhu1, Yanan Wang1, Yufei Cheng1, Yangang Su2, Haiyan Chen1, Xianhong Shu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure-strain loops (PSLs), which are generated by combining LV longitudinal strain with brachial artery blood pressure, provide a novel method of quantifying global and segmental myocardial work (MW) indices with potential advantages over conventional echocardiographic strain data, which suffers from being load-dependent. This method has been recently introduced in echocardiographic software, enhancing the efficiency of MW calculations. This study aimed to evaluate the role of non-invasive MW indices derived from LV PSLs in predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.
METHODS: A total of 106 heart failure (HF) patients scheduled for CRT were included in the MW analysis. Global and segmental (septal and lateral at the mid-ventricular level) MW indices were assessed before CRT and at a 6-month follow-up. Response to CRT was defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume and ≥1 NYHA functional class improvement at 6-month follow-up compared to baseline.
RESULTS: CRT response was observed in 78 (74%) patients. At baseline, the global work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) were significantly higher in CRT responders than in non-responders (both P<0.05). Furthermore, responders exhibited significantly higher mid lateral MW and mid lateral constructive work (CW) (both P<0.001), but significantly lower mid septal MWI and mid septal myocardial work efficiency (MWE) than non-responders (all P<0.01). Baseline mid septal MWE (OR 0.975, 95% CI: 0.959-0.990, P=0.002) and mid lateral MWI (OR 1.003, 95% CI: 1.002-1.004, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CRT response in multivariate regression analysis. Mid septal MWE ≤42% combined with mid lateral MWI ≥740 mmHg% predicted CRT response, with an optimal sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 82% [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) =0.830, P<0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of MW indices before CRT could identify the marked imbalance in LV MW distribution and can be widely used as a reliable complementary tool for guiding patient selection for CRT in clinical practice. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); myocardial work; non-invasive; pressure-strain loop; segmental heterogeneity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33816178      PMCID: PMC7930681          DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  33 in total

1.  Prognostic implications of global, left ventricular myocardial work efficiency before cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Pieter van der Bijl; Ngoc Mai Vo; Marina V Kostyukevich; Bart Mertens; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Clinical versus echocardiographic parameters to assess response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Jeroen J Bax; Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung; Ernst E van der Wall; Qing Zhang; Martin J Schalij; Joseph Yat-Sun Chan; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Refining success of cardiac resynchronization therapy using a simple score predicting the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling: results from the Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study.

Authors:  Alexander H Maass; Kevin Vernooy; Sofieke C Wijers; Jetske van 't Sant; Maarten J Cramer; Mathias Meine; Cornelis P Allaart; Frederik J De Lange; Frits W Prinzen; Bart Gerritse; Erna Erdtsieck; Coert O S Scheerder; Michael R S Hill; Marcoen Scholten; Mariëlle Kloosterman; Iris A H Ter Horst; Adriaan A Voors; Marc A Vos; Michiel Rienstra; Isabelle C Van Gelder
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial.

Authors:  Eugene S Chung; Angel R Leon; Luigi Tavazzi; Jing-Ping Sun; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John Merlino; William T Abraham; Stefano Ghio; Christophe Leclercq; Jeroen J Bax; Cheuk-Man Yu; John Gorcsan; Martin St John Sutton; Johan De Sutter; Jaime Murillo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Angelo Auricchio; Cecilia Fantoni; Francois Regoli; Corrado Carbucicchio; Andreas Goette; Christoph Geller; Michael Kloss; Helmut Klein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting--a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  John Gorcsan; Theodore Abraham; Deborah A Agler; Jeroen J Bax; Genevieve Derumeaux; Richard A Grimm; Randy Martin; Jonathan S Steinberg; Martin St John Sutton; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  A new approach to assess myocardial work by non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain relations in hypertension and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jonathan Chan; Natalie F A Edwards; Bijoy K Khandheria; Kenji Shiino; Surendran Sabapathy; Bonita Anderson; Robert Chamberlain; Gregory M Scalia
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Authors:  Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Wasted septal work in left ventricular dyssynchrony: a novel principle to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  J Vecera; M Penicka; M Eriksen; K Russell; J Bartunek; M Vanderheyden; O A Smiseth
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial work in Turner syndrome patients: insights from the novel non-invasive pressure-strain loop analysis method.

Authors:  Felix Sebastian Oberhoffer; Hashim Abdul-Khaliq; Anna-Maria Jung; Michael Zemlin; Tilman R Rohrer; Mohamed Abd El Rahman
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Application value of myocardial work technology by non-invasive echocardiography in evaluating left ventricular function in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Qiang Zheng; Lin Liu; Yanan Li; Cunying Cui; Yuanyuan Liu; Yanbin Hu; Danqing Huang; Ying Wang; Jun Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  Quantitative assessment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a non-invasive pressure-strain loop technique.

Authors:  Xia Li; Huijuan Chen; Meng Han; Yanling Luo; Fengzhen Liu; Lili Chen; Xiaolin Wang; Yu Zhao; Ruirui Kang; Chujun Wang; Chunquan Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

3.  Assessment of Myocardial Work of the Left Ventricle before and after PCI in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome by Pressure-Strain Loop Technology.

Authors:  Fei Ren; Ting Xue; Ge Tang; Man Zhang; Jing Zhao; Yun'An Chen; Jixu Fan; Ming Yu; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.