Literature DB >> 16442375

Clinical versus echocardiographic parameters to assess response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Gabe B Bleeker1, Jeroen J Bax, Jeffrey Wing-Hong Fung, Ernst E van der Wall, Qing Zhang, Martin J Schalij, Joseph Yat-Sun Chan, Cheuk-Man Yu.   

Abstract

Currently, a clear definition of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is still lacking, and clinical and echocardiographic end points are used. It is also unclear whether patients with clinical responses also improve in echocardiographic end points (and vice versa). To better understand and define response to CRT, the relation between improvement in clinical and echocardiographic parameters was evaluated in 144 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16442375     DOI： 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN： 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  71 in total

1.  Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) techniques for resynchronization: phase analysis and equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in CKD Stage 4 Patients.

Authors:  Ulas Höke; Mand J H Khidir; Enno T van der Velde; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado; Nina Ajmone Marsan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Stephen B Wilton; Mariko A Shibata; Rachel Sondergaard; Karen Cowan; Lisa Semeniuk; Derek V Exner
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Baseline myocardial perfusion predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Michael V Orlov; Michael Maysky; Spyridon T Akrivakis; Michael R Ujhelyi; Peter Hoffmeister; Gunjan Shukla; Susan McAllister; Gregory Kotler; Ibrahim Almasry; G Muqtada Chaudhry; Charles I Haffajee
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  New insights in LV torsion for the selection of cardiac resynchronisation therapy candidates.

Authors:  I K Rüssel; M J W Götte
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Not left ventricular lead position, but the extent of immediate asynchrony reduction predicts long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wolfram C Poller; Henryk Dreger; Marius Schwerg; Hansjürgen Bondke; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Echocardiography in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy; a useful approach?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; E R Holman; A J Scholte; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Tissue characterization in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy; a valuable approach?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Paul W X Foley; Francisco Leyva; Michael P Frenneaux
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Cardiovascular dynamics in ischemic cardiomyopathy during exercise.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J J Bax; C A Swenne; P Steendijk; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.