Literature DB >> 28339818

Refining success of cardiac resynchronization therapy using a simple score predicting the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling: results from the Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study.

Alexander H Maass1, Kevin Vernooy2, Sofieke C Wijers3, Jetske van 't Sant3, Maarten J Cramer3, Mathias Meine3, Cornelis P Allaart4, Frederik J De Lange5, Frits W Prinzen6, Bart Gerritse7, Erna Erdtsieck8, Coert O S Scheerder7,9, Michael R S Hill10, Marcoen Scholten11, Mariëlle Kloosterman1, Iris A H Ter Horst3, Adriaan A Voors1, Marc A Vos12, Michiel Rienstra1, Isabelle C Van Gelder1.   

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in systolic heart failure patients with ventricular conduction delay. Variability of individual response to CRT warrants improved patient selection. The Markers and Response to CRT (MARC) study was designed to investigate markers related to response to CRT. Methods and results: We prospectively studied the ability of 11 clinical, 11 electrocardiographic, 4 echocardiographic, and 16 blood biomarkers to predict CRT response in 240 patients. Response was measured by the reduction of indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVi) at 6 months follow-up. Biomarkers were related to LVESVi change using log-linear regression on continuous scale. Covariates that were significant univariately were included in a multivariable model. The final model was utilized to compose a response score. Age was 67 ± 10 years, 63% were male, 46% had ischaemic aetiology, LV ejection fraction was 26 ± 8%, LVESVi was 75 ± 31 mL/m2, and QRS was 178 ± 23 ms. At 6 months LVESVi was reduced to 58 ± 31 mL/m2 (relative reduction of 22 ± 24%), 130 patients (61%) showed ≥ 15% LVESVi reduction. In univariate analysis 17 parameters were significantly associated with LVESVi change. In the final model age, QRSAREA (using vectorcardiography) and two echocardiographic markers (interventricular mechanical delay and apical rocking) remained significantly associated with the amount of reverse ventricular remodelling. This CAVIAR (CRT-Age-Vectorcardiographic QRSAREA -Interventricular Mechanical delay-Apical Rocking) response score also predicted clinical outcome assessed by heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The CAVIAR response score predicts the amount of reverse remodelling after CRT and may be used to improve patient selection. Clinical Trials: NCT01519908. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers ; Cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography ; Heart failure ; Vectorcardiography

Year:  2018        PMID: 28339818     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  30 in total

1.  Sex differences in optimal atrioventricular delay in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mariëlle Kloosterman; Alexander H Maass
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Relation between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block: An electro- and vectorcardiographic study.

Authors:  Jan De Pooter; Milad El Haddad; Victor Kamoen; Thomas Tibin Kallupurackal; Roland Stroobandt; Marc De Buyzere; Frank Timmermans
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Concomitant changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization and long-term outcomes of biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Christoffer Polcwiartek; Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Claus Graff; Peter L Sørensen; Joseph Kisslo; Zak Loring; Steen M Hansen; Kristian Kragholm; Bhupendar Tayal; Svend E Jensen; Peter Søgaard; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  PR Prolongation predicts inadequate resynchronization with biventricular pacing in left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Brett D Atwater; Kasper Emerek; Peter L Sørensen; Steen M Hansen; Zak Loring; Claus Graff; Christoffer Polcwiartek; Joseph Kisslo; Peter Søgaard; Daniel J Friedman
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 1.976

5.  Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Fatima M Ezzeddine; Antoine N Saliba; Vaibhav Jain; Hector R Villarraga; Joerg Herrmann; Samuel J Asirvatham; Yong-Mei Cha
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  The value of non-invasive myocardial work indices derived from left ventricular pressure-strain loops in predicting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mengruo Zhu; Yanan Wang; Yufei Cheng; Yangang Su; Haiyan Chen; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

Review 7.  Comparative efficacy of image-guided techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Hai Xu; Shameer Raaj Avishkar Hassea; Zhiyong Qian; Yao Wang; Xinwei Zhang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Acute recoordination rather than functional hemodynamic improvement determines reverse remodelling by cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Philippe C Wouters; Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Mathias Meine; Frits W Prinzen; Pieter A Doevendans; Bart W L De Boeck
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Wouter M van Everdingen; Alwin Zweerink; Robin Nijveldt; Odette A E Salden; Mathias Meine; Alexander H Maass; Kevin Vernooy; Frederik J De Lange; Albert C van Rossum; Pierre Croisille; Patrick Clarysse; Bastiaan Geelhoed; Michiel Rienstra; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Marc A Vos; Cornelis P Allaart; Maarten J Cramer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Cellular Therapeutics for Heart Failure: Focus on Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Amitabh C Pandey; Jordan J Lancaster; David T Harris; Steven Goldman; Elizabeth Juneman
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.