A review of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): based on genomic structure, phylogeny, current shreds of evidence, candidate vaccines, and drug repurposing.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is instigated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of March 13, 2021, more than 118.9 million cases were infected with COVID-19 worldwide. SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA beta-CoV. Most COVID-19 infected individuals recover within 1-3 weeks. Nevertheless, approximately 5% of patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and other systemic complications, leading to death. Structural genetic analyses of SARS-CoV-2 have shown genomic resemblances but a low evolutionary correlation to SARS-CoV-1 responsible for the 2002-2004 outbreak. The S glycoprotein is critical for cell adhesion and the entrance of the virus into the host. The process of cell entry uses the cellular receptor named angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Recent evidence proposed that the CD147 as a SARS-CoV-2's potential receptor. The viral genome is mainly held by two non-structural proteins (NSPs), ORF1a and ORF1ab, along with structural proteins. Although NSPs are conserved among the βCoVs, mutations in NSP2 and NSP3 may play critical roles in transmitting the virus and cell tropism. To date, no specific/targeted anti-viral treatments exist. Notably, more than 50 COVID-19 candidate vaccines in clinical trials, and a few being administered. Preventive precautions are the primary strategy to limit the viral load transmission and spread, emphasizing the urgent need for developing significant drug targets and vaccines against COVID-19. This review provides a cumulative overview of the genomic structure, transmission, phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 from Indian clusters, treatment options, updated discoveries, and future standpoints for COVID-19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-021-02749-0. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2021.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which started in Wuhan, China, has spread across the world, affecting 218 countries and territories (Huang et al. 2020a; Wang et al. 2020a; Li et al. 2020b; WHO 2020a). The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the infection. The virus mainly affects the respiratory system leading to flu-like symptoms, including high temperature, coughing, and in more severe cases, breathing difficulty (Zou et al. 2020). Most patients recover in a period of 1–3 weeks; however, approximately 5% develop severe symptoms that may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and respiratory failure, which may cause death. Besides, in patients at high risk, COVID-19 may lead to systemic inflammation, putting patients at risk of sepsis, cardiac injury, and organ dysfunction (Wang et al. 2020a). Older people (> 60 years) and people with other morbidities are at a higher risk of mortality (Wang et al. 2020a).

Coronaviruses (CoVs) belong to the family of Coronaviridae that encompass four genera that include alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-CoVs. Alpha- and beta-CoVs infect mammals and humans, while gamma-CoVs infect birds and delta-CoVs infect birds and mammals. The two most known types of human CoVs are the beta-CoV OC43 and the alpha-CoV 229E, both of which typically cause minor disease conditions, usually mild upper respiratory diseases that are self-limiting in individuals with a tolerable immune system (Sahin et al. 2020). Other human coronaviruses include the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV, 2013), SARS-CoV-1 (2002), and the novel SARS-CoV-2, all of them belong to beta-CoVs, are transmitted through zoonotic transmission (from animals to humans), then spread among humans via close contact causing severe diseases (Li et al. 2020a). Genomic characterization revealed that the sequences of SARS-CoV-2 exhibit high homology with that of the previously identified SARS-CoV-1 and weaker homology with MERS-CoV (Jaimes et al. 2020).

Nevertheless, the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 are not precisely the same as that of SARS-CoV-1. SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmittable compared to SARS-CoV-1, with a 2.6 primary reproduction number (R0) of spread, implying that the number of SARS-COV-2 positive cases increases exponentially (Hellewell et al. 2020). Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 has lower-level mortality compared to SARS-CoV-1. CoVs are enveloped viruses and have the most abundant RNA viral genome, with a length of 26 to 32 kb (Lu et al. 2020). The replication mechanism of CoVs is quite complicated to ease virus reproduction (Chen and Guo, 2016). The virion’s primary connection with the host cell takes place between the S protein and its receptor. The positions of receptor binding domains (RBD) vary depending on the structural changes (Fehr and Perlman 2015). SARS-CoV-2 is spreading much faster than any other respiratory viruses. The incubation period of the virus ranges from 2–14 days, and a fraction of people likely transmit the infection without manifesting any symptoms of the disease (Martinez 2020). Currently, there are no effective treatments for COVID-19. Mutations in the genome of SARS-CoV-2 pose a significant challenge to researchers in drug and vaccine development (Xu et al. 2020a, b). Currently, there are more than 118.9 million cases have been recorded worldwide, with India listed in the 2nd place of the most confirmed cases (Table 1) (Kumar et al. 2020; Udhaya Kumar et al. 2020; MOHFW 2020; WHO 2020a). The top five states with the highest cases in India are provided in Table 1. Besides, we provided a country-wise full case report, cumulative total per 1 million population, the total number of deaths, and classification of transmission till March 13, 2021 (Supplementary Table 1) (WHO 2020a). This review aims to provide comprehensive insights into the genomic structure, transmission, treatment options, recent findings, and future standpoints towards COVID-19.

Table 1

Confirmed COVID-19 cases along with the list of countries and states in India with the highest cases (https://covid19.who.int; https://mygov.in/covid-19/)

Confirmed cases over the date of 13th March, 2021—118,268,575 Deaths over date 13th March, 2021—2,624,677
Americas	52,386,995
South-East Asia	13,819,871
Europe	40,640,050
Eastern Mediterranean	6,793,641
Africa	2,932,557
Western Pacific	1,694,716
Highest number of cases recorded across the globe
United States of America	28,940,137
India	11,308,846
Brazil	11,202,305
Russia Federation	4,370,617
The United Kingdom	4,241,681
Highest number of cases recorded across India
Maharashtra	22,66,374
Kerala	10,85,663
Karnataka	9,57,584
Andhra Pradesh	8,91,178
Tamil Nadu	8,57,602

Genomic structure

CoVs are known to possess the largest genomes among all known RNA viruses, with a length ranging from 25 to 31 kb. SARS-CoV-2 is a spherical enveloped consisting of single-stranded positive-sense RNA linked with a nucleoprotein inside a capsid comprising a matrix protein. The envelope has glycoprotein projections in a bear club-shape. The viral diameter is approximately 150–160 nm. The SARS-CoV-2 exhibits high sequence similarity with the bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC2 (≈ 88% and 87%, respectively) while being less similar to SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV (≈ 79% and 50%, respectively) (Lu et al. 2020).

A typical CoV genome contains protein-encoding domains (5′ non-basic) consisting of two-third of genome replicase genes and 3′ structural and non-essential accessory protein-coding domains (Masters 2006). The cells that contain the virus produce seven to nine viral-specific messenger RNAs with ends of 3′ co-terminal (Masters 2006). The mRNAs’ entirety conveys similar master sequences that span 70–90 nucleotides at the end of 5′ (Lai et al. 1984, 1985). At their 5′ ends, CoVs mRNAs have a leader sequence, which is common among them (Spaan et al. 1983), which comprises a transcription regulatory sequence (TRS-L) at the 3′ end that arranges part of the signal for transcription of the sub-genomic mRNA (Budzilowicz et al. 1985). The transcriptional regulatory sequences (TRSs) of all CoVs incorporated the conserved core sequences (CS), consisting of 6–8 nucleotides, along with 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences (Sola et al. 2005). Beta-CoVs comprise 5′-UCUAAAC-3′, a heptameric consensus sequence. Replication occurs shortly after the virus enters the infective cell, followed by virion transfection via the generation of entire-length genomic and sub-genomic intermediate negative strands (Yount et al. 2000). There is a minimum of 6 open reading frames (ORFs) in the CoV structures’ genomic and subgenomic regions. The SARS-CoV-2 genome contains 14 ORFs. The most significant part of the whole genome length is known to be the ORFa/b, the first of the ORFs, which encodes NSP1-16 (non-structural proteins), apart from Gamma-CoVs with the absence of NSP1. The polypeptides pp1a and pp1ab produced by − 1 frameshift among ORF1a and ORF1b are processed virally determined main protease (Mpro) or chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) and other minor proteases into 16 NSPs (Masters 2006).

As revealed by the whole-genome sequence alignment of the NSP-coding regions, there is approximately 58% identity among the varying CoV strains. About 43% identity in the structural protein-coding regions implies that NSPs form the genome’s conserved regions, while structural proteins are more diverse (Chen et al. 2020). The NSPs aid in replication of the genome, proteolytic cleavage, and development of sub-genomic mRNA (14–16 final products prepared for coronaviruses) are inscribed on gene one inside the 5′- proximate, which is two-third; whereas the structural proteins are inscribed on eight-nine genes inside the 3′- proximate, which is one-third of the coronavirus genome. The structural genes are positioned in the order of 5′ to 3′; they encode for viral proteins that include spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) proteins. Overall, the SARS-CoV-2 genome is about 25–31 kb in size with a spherical structure containing 9,860 amino acids. The genome encodes for 13 ORF’s, out of which the first one-third codes for NSPs, and the remaining make up the structural proteins. The CoV strains’ identity varies in terms of the protein structure, where structural proteins show diverse structural characteristics.

SARS-CoV-2 detection

Nucleotide detection assays (NDA) such as Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and RT-PCR detection technologies were implemented to detect SARS-CoV-2 (Shey et al. 2020; NGS 2020, p. 19). Compared to the sequencing/NGS technologies, RT-PCR remains a cheaper method to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection (Ai et al. 2020). The results can be achieved by assessing the expectorated sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or endotracheal aspirate samples acquired from the respiratory tracts (Lambert-Niclot et al. 2020). The tests are repeated for re-verification in positive results and negative cases with strong clinical suspicions (Hassan et al. 2020). The genetic material obtained from the mucus or salivary samples is amplified in the laboratory using RT-PCR. After retrieving a sufficient amount of the genetic material, the conserved regions of the CoV are determined. The probes have been used based on existing gene sequences published on Virological.org by the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center & Public Health School, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, and subsequently confirmed by other labs. In the COVID-19 positive cases, the tests are repeated to confirm the viral particles’ clearance before the patient’s discharge. The testing for the infection will differ based on the country (Dong et al. 2020). Several biosensors have been developed and identified for early SARS-CoV-2 detection (Behera et al. 2020).

Commercial NDA such as SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection kits was discovered, and nearly 37 commercial detection kits were approved by FDA (Health 2020). Non-commercial NDA, such as Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and RT-LAMP, is recognized as an optimistic method than PCR. It provides more sensitivity, specificity, product yield, and reaction efficiency (Ji et al. 2020). Consequently, several other detection methods have been employed, such as NP antigen detection assay, Antibody detection assays targeting SP and NP viral proteins (Ejazi et al. 2020; Li et al. 2020c; Guo et al. 2020). CT findings have been used controversially as a surrogate diagnostic test. Chest CT has a vital role in diagnosing COVID-19. COVID-19 occurs with pneumonia symptoms in the initial stage, including dry cough, fever, chest congestion, and fatigue. Therefore, chest scan aids in the assessment of the disease extent condition and its follow-ups as it shows the patchy or diffuse asymmetric airspace opacities, which is an acute symptom of COVID-19. The initial scans showed a bilateral lung development pattern for around 40 patients out of 41 ICU patients (Hosseiny et al. 2020). The multifocal peripheral ground glass imaging results are highly suspicious of COVID-19, which might show a rapid change in a short duration (Table 2) (Li et al. 2020d).

Table 2

Current SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis methods

Method	Instrument	Use	Disadvantage
Nucleotide detection assay (Shey et al. 2020; NGS 2020, p. 19)	DNA sequencing	To identify novel mutations and the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 isolates	Time-consuming, high manpower, Expensive
	RT-PCR	High detection sensitivity detect more target regions	Risk of eliciting false-negative and false-positive results False-negative results may occur by mutations in the primer and probe target
Virus particle detection (Ji et al. 2020)	Immunoassay	Utilizes fabricate graphene-based field-effect-transistor (FET) biosensors	High signal noise ratio
NP antigen detection assay (Lambert-Niclot et al. 2020)	Mass spectrometric analysis, ELISA, and quantum dot-based lateral flow assay	Detected within three days of onset of fever,	NP expression is lower in SARS-CoV-2 than in SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Detection sensitivity is affected
Antibody detection assay (Ejazi et al. 2020)	Serum Antibody detection	Effective, quick, the specificity of 90.63% and a sensitivity of 88.66%,	Detection of False-positive anti-RBD antibody
Biosensor Detections (Behera et al. 2020)	Lateral flow assay (LFA)	user-friendly, cheap, and easily mass-produced	The sensitivity of the LFA is, however, too low to achieve a highly accurate screening of COVID-19 patients
	Electrochemical	Very promising biosensor for highly sensitive point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection. Recognized using an antigen–antibody reaction, DNA, RNA, or peptide nucleic acid (PNAs) hybridization or aptamers-based binding High selectivity and sensitivity for the detection target	Not available
	Chip-based nucleic acid detection	Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and robust, Equipment-free, and Deliverable (ASSURED)	Reagent volumes for virus detection in resource-limited settings

Structural proteins

SARS-CoV-2 encompasses four types of structural proteins, namely S, E, M, and N proteins. These four structural proteins share high sequence identity to that of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV. It is incorporated with hemagglutination (HE) and glycoprotein acetyl esterase, making SARS-CoV-2 distinct from other CoVs (Cascella et al. 2020). The S proteins lie in the outermost sessions of the viral particle, ACE2, which is known to have an essential part in the action of transmembrane receptor recognition, which is used by the CoVs to make an entry into the host cell. Therefore, the host specificity and infectious nature of CoVs are determined chiefly by the S proteins (Letko et al. 2020). Among all proteins within the virus structure, M protein is perhaps the most effective and is present in considerably various extents; it also provides the virus’s shape. Figure 1 depicts the SARS-CoV-2 mechanism in the host cell.

Fig. 1

The SARS-CoV-2 life cycle inside its host cell; starts when the S protein binding occurs with the ACE2 receptor. After the binding process, the S protein changes enable the fusion of the viral envelope via the cell membrane’s endosomal pathway. Then the RNA is released from the SARS-CoV-2 inside the host cell. The translation of the RNA genome into the viral replicase polyproteins, which produces various viral particles. A sequence of sub-genomic mRNAs are produced by discontinuous transcription and, at last, get translated into viral proteins. These viral proteins and RNA genome are organized in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi’s virions, which are further transported through the vesicles, and finally, exocytosis occurs

On the other hand, inside the virion, E protein exists in the least quantity and helps release the infected cells’ viral particles (Nal et al. 2005; Ashour et al. 2020). Simultaneously, the N protein attaches to the viral RNA, which is obligatory during viral assembly for wrapping the viral RNA into the viral components (Parameshwar et al. 2020). On the beta-CoV surface, the HE is located. It is similar to the influenza virus hemagglutinin. It provokes acetyl-esterase activity, characteristics of HE might enhance the pathogenesis and entrance of CoVs that involve proteins at its viral structure (Klausegger et al. 1999). CoVs use the S proteins to initiate the binding with the host cell. The binding activation is carried out by furin, an enzyme in several humans’ organs, including the lungs, small intestine, and liver (Callaway et al. 2020). The S protein and the furin enzyme activation are not the only factors; other human cells’ elements make them more vulnerable to new SARS-CoV-2 infection. In human cells, it was shown that the S protein needs to bind to ACE2, which allows SARS-CoV-2 to cause infection in human cells (Wrapp et al. 2020).

Experts suggested that furin inhibitors might be an effective therapeutic against COVID-19. Meanwhile, it is also recommended that blocking ACE2 might also be another feasible solution, stopping the CoV from cell entry (Coutard et al. 2020). In CoV, the RNA genome is enclosed in the N protein, further embedded into an envelope (Fan et al. 2005; McBride et al. 2014). The structural and NSPs are produced by sub-genomic + sense RNAs translation. After the formation of viral RNA components, the assembling of structural viral protein occurs in the virions. The budding and viral assembly occur in the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate (Zhang et al. 2020).

Common drug targets

Spike protein (S)

The S protein is a 150 KDa class I fusion transmembrane protein found in its outer portion. The protein contains an alpha-helical coiled structure and is highly glycosylated as it includes N-glycosylation sites from 21 to 35. It gathers as trimers giving a crown shape (corona; crown in Latin). They usually contain two N-terminal spaces labeled S1 that are liable for binding the receptor and a C-terminal S2 space essential for fusion. The S1 spaces comprise two sub-domains: N-terminal space and C-terminal space. Both subdomains work as receptor restricting spaces and tie an assortment of protein and sugar (Robson 2020). The SARS-CoV-2′s S protein attaches ten to multiple times more sturdily to the receptor ACE2 in people in contrast to that of the S protein of SARS-CoV-1 infection from 2002, which is liable for the simple spread of COVID-19 from individual to individual than different CoVs. The antibodies used against SARS-CoV-1 could not bind to the new SARS-CoV-2 S protein successfully; therefore, the vaccines or the antibody-based treatment should be unique for COVID-19. It is noteworthy that the proteases in host cells cleave the S1 domain instantly after the upstream of the S2 fusion peptide, which is anticipated to be the reason for protein activation through irreversible conformational changes (Walls et al. 2020).

Envelope protein (E)

The E protein is a small integral membrane protein but perhaps the most enigmatic. It is primarily expressed in infected cells during the replication cycle, and only a minute fraction is integrated with the virus envelope. The E protein is essential in virus assembly and maturation (Schoeman and Fielding 2019). They have three domains: hydrophilic amino acid terminus consist of 7–12 amino acids, the transmembrane hydrophobic domain containing 25 amino acids, and a long C-terminal end with the majority of proteins. The transmembrane domain (TMD) comprises two nonpolar, impartial amino acids: Leu and Val give solid hydrophobicity to E-protein. The central region [TMD] is uncharged, which is flanked towards one side by the amino acid negatively charged and on the opposite side via carboxy end of variable charges, which together give the E peptide gross net charge of zero (Schoeman and Fielding 2019). The E protein of SARS-CoV contains a restricting theme called postsynaptic thickness protein 95 (PSD95), Drosophila plate enormous tumor silencer (Dlg1), Zonula occludes-1 protein (zo-1), PBM found in the last four amino corrosive of the C end. PDZ area can tie to the C-end of the cell connector protein engaged with have cell process that brings about the viral disease (Schoeman and Fielding 2019; Chan et al. 2020; Bianchi et al. 2020). Genetic analysis of the E protein revealed that the protein sequences in SARS-CoV-2 exhibit high identity from Pangolin and Bat isolate. Besides, evidence revealed a distinctive feature of E variants of SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of Arg at position 69, which replaces Asp, Glu, and Gln in SARS-CoV-1 E homologous proteins. Besides, there is a deletion at position 70, which corresponds to Cys or Gly in the other homologous proteins and other existing variations at positions 37, 55 to 56, and at 72 (Bianchi et al. 2020).

Membrane protein (M)

The M protein is considered the most extensive protein in CoV’s structural membrane. The membrane bilayer has the domain of short NH2-terminal in the outer part of the virus. It constitutes the cytoplasmic domain, i.e., the long COOH-terminus in the viral particle’s internal part. It has a vital role in forming the intracellular viral structures without the S protein (Mousavizadeh and Ghasemi 2020). It does not appear to have an enzymatic function, and it is not an ideal target either. Recent evidence revealed structural differences distinctive for SARS-CoV-2M protein that might be linked to the cross-species transmission and viral properties. Several variants were identified in SARS-CoV-2 M protein, including Ser2, Gly3, Val57, Arg89, lle70, Ser85, and Met175 (Bianchi et al. 2020). Although multiple sequence alignment revealed high structural similarity (~ 98%) between M protein variants in SARS-CoV-2 and counterparts from Pangolin and Bats, the N-terminal position exhibited a variation in position four of the SARS-CoV-2′s M protein, consisting of an insertion of a Ser residue. In contrast, in the homologous proteins, there was a deletion in the RaTG13 Bat and an Asp residue in Bat CoVZC45, CoVZXC21, and Pangolin MP789 isolates.

Nucleocapsid protein (N)

The N protein is primarily involved in binding to the virus’s RNA genome, forming a shell around the nucleic acid. During the viral assembly process, there is a connection between the N-protein and M-protein, assisting the RNA synthesis and folding, which is vital in the viral budding and disturbs the responses like cell cycle and translation in host cells. Recent evidence revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 N protein manifests high sequence similarity to SARS-CoV-1 (~ 90.5%) (Zeng et al. 2020). Nevertheless, structural differences that are distinctive for SARS-CoV-2 were reported. Most of the variants identified in the N protein of SARS-CoV-2 were missense mutations (such as 203_204delinsKR, S194L, P13L, and S197L) and synonymous mutations (such as D128D and L139L), and fewer were deletion and insertion mutations (Koyama et al. 2020).

Non-structural proteins (NSPs)

The SARS-CoV genome encodes many proteins, including the replicase gene, a vital element of the genome CoV, encoding for 16 NSPs that constitute two large polypeptides, PP1a PP1ab. Two types of cysteine proteases function on those PPs to activate the NSPs. Chymotrypsin-like cysteine protease cleaves the C-terminal end of these PPs, and the Mpro processes the N-terminal end, which is called papain-like protease (PLpro). PLpro excises the first three cleavage sites in the PPs, while CLpro cleaves the remaining 11 sites, resulting in 16 NSPs release (Prajapat et al. 2020a, b).

Researchers in Gladstone Institute, US, have identified SARS-CoV-2 protein-human protein interactions using affinity purification mass spectroscopy. They discovered 332 SARS-CoV-2 protein-human protein interactions, of which 66 druggable human proteins were identified to be targeted by 69 compounds, of which some are already FDA-approved and in clinical trials (Gordon et al. 2020). According to a recent study, the SARS-CoV-2 genome encodes 14 ORFs. In particular, 5′ Orf1a/Orf1ab encodes polyprotein, which is autoproteolytically processed to 16 NSPs [NSP1-NSP16]. These form the replicase/transcriptase complex (RTC) such as NSP1, the main protease (NSP5), 2′O-methyltransferases (NSP10/NSP16), the primase complex (NSP7-NSP8), papain-like protease (NSP3), a helicase/triphosphatase (NSP13), an exoribonuclease (NSP14), the primary RdRp (NSP12), and an endonuclease (NSP15) (Li 2016). The NSP1 interacts with the DNA replication of the host pathway. The NSP5, NSP8, NSP13 interact with the epigenetic and gene expression regulatory pathway of the host. NSP6, NSP7, NSP10, NSP13, NSP15 interact with vesicle trafficking. NSP8 interacts with RNA processing and regulation of the host pathway. NSP9 interacts with the extracellular matrix and NSP8; NSP13 interacts with the host signaling pathway of the infection’s replication mechanism that makes duplicates of its RNA genome (Chen et al. 2020). The original CoV’ RdRp exists as mind-boggling with polymerase called NSP12 and some small proteins NSP7 and NSP8. It consists of a shape such as the right hand. The RdRp from SARS-CoV (2002) and SARS-CoV-2 having a similar dynamic site of RNA polymerization and indistinguishable amino corrosive arrangements. Scientists hypothesized that remdesivir drug inhibits the RdRp of SARS-CoV-2, for which the clinical trials have started to test the ability of this drug to the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. However, it is not clear that how the mutant RdRp works with remdesivir, and a recent study found a potential compound with a higher affinity for both the native and mutant RdRp through virtual screening strategies (Thirumal et al. 2021). The S, M, and E proteins form the envelope and protect the viral particle from external factors (Bianchi et al. 2020; Huang et al. 2020b; Thomas 2020). In short, protein structures play a crucial role in drug targets. The S glycoprotein structure of SARS-CoV-2 utilizes the ACE2 receptor of the host for cell entry, followed by other viral proteins exhibiting their role for the viral mechanism inside the host cell.

Evolution and phylogenetic analysis of COVID-19 genomes

A phylogenetic relationship of SARS-CoV-2′s genome was reported in many studies; this method was applied to investigate the phylogenetic relationships among the genomes of CoVs, which investigate the developmental pathways and their ancestral/hereditary genome in the host organism (Forster et al. 2020; Jaimes et al. 2020; Nie et al. 2020). It is mainly applied to investigate human evolution; however, it was applied less in viral evolution (Forster et al. 2020). SARS-CoV-2 is an ancestry of beta-SARS-CoV that belongs to the Coronaviridae family. Unlike SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 possess a distinct evolution and proteolytically-sensitive activation loop, which is believed to be responsible for its high contagiousness and pathogenicity (Jaimes et al. 2020). Recent phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 was phylogenetically close to the RaTG13, accompanied by GD Pangolin SARSr-CoV, and by GX Pangolin SARSr-CoVs, and now by ZC45 and ZXC21, then by human SARS-CoV, and last by BM48-31 (Tang et al. 2020). As of March 13, 2021, more than 3,12,463 SAR-CoV-2 genome sequences are identified globally and available in the public domain. Based on the mutation marker, globally, six phylogenetic clades of SARS-CoV-2 were categorized (GH, S, GR, V, G, and L) (Jacob et al. 2020). Since the phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 genome was reported by Jacob et al. (2020), our review focused on discussing the relationship between the phylogeny from Indian clusters to understand the genomic evolution (Jacob et al. 2020). The sequences of SARS-CoV-2′s genomes reported in India, which belong to the genus Coronaviridae, were extracted from the GISAID initiative. Many national institutions collected the SARS-CoV-2 samples from different regions of India; their genomes were sequenced and deposited in the GISAID initiative (GISAID 2020). For our phylogenetic study, alignments of nucleotides were constructed with the help of Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT), and Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy (BMGE) algorithm was applied to compute the appropriate locations for phylogenetic analysis in the query multiple sequence alignment and followed by FastME to compute the pairwise distances and tree (Desper and Gascuel 2002; Junier and Zdobnov 2010; Criscuolo and Gribaldo 2010; Katoh and Standley 2013; Lefort et al. 2015; Lemoine et al. 2019). For further visualization of the output tree, we used the Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) (Letunic and Bork 2019) (Fig. 2). The SARS-CoV-2 genomes from Indian isolates exhibited a common PANGOLIN lineage, which is highly transmissible (B.1/B.1.1/B.1.36) with mutation (D614G); whereas, the B.6 lineage reported as a second common and least transmissible owing to the absence of mutation in S protein (Jacob et al. 2020; Banu et al. 2020; Koyama et al. 2020). Intriguingly, the Gujarat dominant linage B.1.36 contains one-three S protein mutations that would lead to higher infection rates.

Fig. 2

Analysis of phylogeny relationship between the Indian SARS-CoV-2 genomes of Coronaviridae from GISAID (https://www.gisaid.org/epiflu-applications/hcov-19-genomic-epidemiology/). Nearly 775 high-quality genomes were retrieved and conducted the phylogenetic analysis with NGPhylogeny (https://ngphylogeny.fr/). An interactive view of phylogeny was plotted using Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) (https://itol.embl.de/). The genome names (nodes) are displayed in red font, branch length from the root was provided in red font for each circle (blue and gray) with designated values. The internal node symbols were depicted in black dots (Display mode: Circular; Gap Penalty = − 1.53, + 0.00, − 0.12; Tree scale: 0.0001)

Therapeutic management of COVID-19

COVID-19 treatment requires clinical care, including aid in oxygen, fluid therapy, and support for other internal organs affected. Current potential therapeutics used against COVID-19 include antibodies, anti-virals, cell-based compounds, RNA-based compounds, anti-inflammatory agents, antimalarial agents, and protein-based antibiotics (Lu 2020). Figure 3 Summarizes current pre-clinical and clinical treatments available to treat COVID-19 (Milken Institute 2020). Table 3 includes a comprehensive description of the clinical evidence for the therapies being studied and Supplementary Table 2. Evidence showed that outpatients could be benefited from acquiring monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 early. Bamlanivimab and casirivimab plus imdevimab monoclonal antibodies as anti-SARS-CoV-2 are provided via EUA for patients at high risk of disease progression.

Fig. 3

COVID-19 therapeutic candidates in both clinical and pre-clinical development. Diverse categories of pre-clinical and clinical research COVID‑19 therapeutic candidates are currently in development—

source: COVID-19 vaccine and treatments tracker, Milken Institute (Milken Institute 2020)

Table 3

COVID-19 candidate drug treatments in clinical trials (Phase III-IV)

Drug Candidate	Organization	Technology	Stage
Valsartan	Radboud Universit, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland	Other	Phase IV
Ebastinea	Mianyang Central Hospital	Antivirals	Phase IV
Danoprevira	Ascletis Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., The Ninth Hospital of Nanchang	Antivirals	Phase IV
Bivalirudin	Hamad Medical Corporation	Other	Phase IV
Somatotropin	ClinAmygate	Dormant/Discontinued	Phase IV
Darunavira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase III/IV
Novaferon	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase III/IV
Ravulizumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase III/IV
Carrimycin	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase III/IV
Nintedanib	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase III/IV
Telmisartan	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Tocilizumaba	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III/IV
Corticosteroid Therapya	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Tissue plasminogen activator	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Anakinraa	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Nitazoxanidea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Eicosapentaenoic Acid Free Fatty Acid	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Rivaroxabana	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Interferon beta-1aa	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Baricitiniba	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Candesartana	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Doxycyclinea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III/IV
Sofosbuvira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III/IV
Ledipasvira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III/IV
(Hydroxy)Chloroquinea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Lopinavira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/II/III/IV
Favipiravira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/II/III/IV
Sarilumaba	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III/IV
Convalescent plasma	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III/IV
Intravenous Immunoglobulin	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III/IV
Ritonavira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/II/III/IV
Camostat Mesylatea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Interferon alpha	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Losartana	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Ivermectina	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Azithromycina	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Low Molecular Weight Heparina	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Bamlanivimab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III/IV
N-acetylcysteine	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Povidone-Iodine	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Dexamethasonea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III/IV
Otilimab	GlaxoSmithKline	Antibodies	Phase III
ASC09a	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase III
Azvudine	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase III
Remestemcel-L	Mesoblast, Inc, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai	Cell-based therapies	Phase III
CD24Fc	OncoImmune, Inc	Other	Phase III
INOpulse	Bellerophon	Device	Phase III
Cobicistata	Multiple Organizations	Antivirals	Phase III
Tradipitant	Vanda Pharmaceuticals	Other	Phase III
Brensocatib	Insmed Inc., University of Dundee	Other	Phase III
Pacritinib	CTI Biopharma	Other	Phase III
Almitrine	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase III
Levilimab	Biocad	Antibodies	Phase III
Prasugrel	Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Milan	Other	Phase III
NK-1R antagonist	University of Lahore, Bahria International Hospital	Other	Phase III
Rosuvastatina	Yale University	Other	Phase III
XC221	RSV Therapeutics LLC	Antivirals	Phase III
Broncho-Vaxom	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase III
Bucillamine	Revive Therapeutics, Ltd	Other	Phase III
Losmapimod	Fulcrum Therapeutics	Other	Phase III
Edoxabana	University Hospital Inselspital, Berne, Daiichi Sankyo Europe, GmbH, a Daiichi Sankyo Company	Other	Phase III
Brexanolone	Sage Therapeutics	Other	Phase III
NA-831a	NeuroActiva, Inc., Biomed Industries, Inc	Other	Phase III
Nicotine	Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris	Other	Phase III
Lidocaine	Multiple Organizations	Other	Phase III
Fenofibrate	Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Barzilai Medical Center	Other	Phase III
Fluvoxamine	Washington University School of Medicine, Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund	Other	Phase II/III
Tranexamic Acid	University of Alabama at Birmingham	Other	Phase II/III
Lenzilumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Bevacizumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Siltuximaba	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Eculizumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Canakinumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Emapalumab	Swedish Orphan Biovitrum	Antibodies	Phase II/III
IFX-1	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Truvadaa	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III
VIR-7831	Vir Biotechnology, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells	Athersys, Inc	Cell-based therapies	Phase II/III
Ifenprodil	Algernon Pharmaceuticals, Novotech	Other	Phase II/III
Nafamostat	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Colchicinea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Selinexor	Karyopharm therapeutics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia	Other	Phase II/III
Vazegepant	Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc	Other	Phase II/III
Dapagliflozina	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Imatiniba	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
DAS181	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III
Dipyridamole	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
ABX464	Abivax S.A	Other	Phase II/III
Dociparastat sodium	Chimerix	Other	Phase II/III
EDP1815	Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Evelo Biosciences, Inc	Other	Phase II/III
Mavrilimumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Levamisolea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Secukinumab	Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, Lomonosov Moscow State University Medical Research and Educational Center	Antibodies	Phase II/III
RTB101	Restorbio Inc., National Institute on Aging	Other	Phase II/III
Tacrolimusa	Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge	Other	Phase II/III
Hyperbaric chamber	Multiple organizations	Device	Phase II/III
Opaganib	RedHill Biopharma Limited, Shaare Zedek Medical Center	Other	Phase II/III
Lactoferrin	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Clazakizumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Ambrisentana	Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust	Other	Phase II/III
PTC299	PTC therapeutics	Other	Phase II/III
Daclatasvira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III
BDB-001	Staidson (Beijing) Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, Beijing Defengrui Biotechnology Co. Ltd	Other	Phase II/III
Olokizumab	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase II/III
NA-831a	NeuroActiva, Inc	Other	Phase II/III
Atazanavira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III
RPH-104	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
RESP301	Thirty respiratory limited	Other	Phase II/III
Atorvastatin	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Acetylsalicylic acid	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
BIO101	Biophytis	Other	Phase II/III
TD139	University of Edinburgh, University of Oxford	Other	Phase II/III
Melatonin	Multiple Organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Itolizumab	Biocon Limited, Equillium	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Apremilasta	QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative, Amgen	Other	Phase II/III
Bardoxolone methyl	NYU Langone Health, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc	Other	Phase II/III
INM005	Inmunova S.A.	Antibodies	Phase II/III
Bicalutamide	University of Florida, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins	Other	Phase II/III
Metformina	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
IMU-838a	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/III
Triazavirin	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase II/III
Furosemide	Queen’s University, University Health Network, Toronto	Other	Phase II/III
Recombinant Nematode Anticoagulant Protein c2	ARCA Biopharma, Inc., Colorado Prevention Center	Other	Phase II/III
Remdesivirb	Multiple Organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/II/III
Thymosin	Multiple Organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
Meplazumab	Tang-Du Hospital, Jiangsu Pacific Meinuoke Bio Pharmaceutical Co Ltd	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III
Ribavirin	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/II/III
Ruxolitinib	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
Nitric Oxide	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
Aviptadil	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
Niclosamidea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
Interferon beta-1ba	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
Molnupiravir	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/II/III
Angiotensin 1–7	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
DNases	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
REGN-COV2	Regeneron Pharmaceuticals	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III
SCTA01	Sinocelltech Ltd	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III
Fostamatinib	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/III
CT-P59	Celltrion	Antibodies	Phase I/II/III
Umifenovira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/IV
Oseltamivira	Multiple organizations	Antivirals	Phase I/III/IV
Famotidine	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/III/IV
Cyclosporine	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/II/IV
TY027	Tychan Pte Ltd	Antibodies	Phase I/III
Bromhexinea	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase I/III/IV
Therapeutic Plasma Exchange	Multiple organizations	Other	Phase II/IV
Chlorhexidine	NYU Langone Health, Ohio State University	Other	Phase II/IV
AZD7442	Multiple organizations	Antibodies	Phase I/III

aMay be used in combination with other therapeutics. Clinical trials mentioned contain this included drug in the regimen

bFDA approved for COVID−19 treatment. This Table was last updated on December 14, 2020. Treatments that have not reached phase III clinical trials are not shown in this Table— source BioRender Vaccine and therapeutics Tracker (Biorender 2020)

Remdesivir (Veklury), an anti-viral agent, is the only FDA-approved drug for the COVID-19 treatment. The course of therapy of remdesivir was found to be effectively tolerated but is not efficacious in critical COVID-19 cases (Ko et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020b, c). Other anti-viral agents, including hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, umifenovir, lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir, and oseltamivir, are currently being analyzed in vivo and in vitro (Table 3, Supplementary Table 2) (Wu et al. 2020; Biorender 2020). Oseltamivir joined with direct anti-infection utilization, has been utilized to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 (Huang et al. 2020a). The adequacy and safety measures of lopinavir-ritonavir and interferon-α 2b in COVID-19 patients are still being investigated (Habibzadeh and Stoneman 2020). In vitro evidence using the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin has effectively worked as a potential therapeutic against SARS-CoV-2 in 48 h. However, the safety and applicability in humans remain to be investigated (Caly et al. 2020). In hospitalized patients who need supplemental oxygen, corticosteroids, including dexamethasone, have been shown to enhance longevity, with the overall benefit seen in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Hence, dexamethasone usage in this condition is highly recommended (Horby et al. 2020; Jeronimo et al. 2020; Angus et al. 2020; Tomazini et al. 2020).

Why protease of COVID-19 be the best drug target?

The crystal structures are always more reliable than computational models (Forrest et al. 2006). The crystal structure of the Mpro (PDB ID- 6LU7) could be the potential drug target with this aspect. It was not limited to this availability, but protease was essential in replicating the virus (Patick and Potts 1998). Replication occurs within the cytoplasm of the host cells that are infected. The coronaviruses’ single-stranded RNA genome is released in the cytoplasm, where it is translated to form a replicase complex, which is then processed proteolytically into NSPs by viral proteases (van Boheemen et al. 2012; Kilianski et al. 2013). This makes it an excellent choice to inhibit the replicating virus and henceforth the viral assembly and its release. Coronavirus proteases are known to be multifunctional. Studies have shown that coronavirus has the DUB and deISGylating to evade innate immune systems (Komander et al. 2009; Jeon et al. 2010). Some of the mechanisms that the virus adapts to evade the immune system include (1) inhibition of the poly I: C by the protease leading to the activation of the TRIF and further the NF-κB signaling. (2) Downregulation of the IFR3 phosphorylation, thereby preventing its dimerization, results in the signal cascade’s termination. (3) Protease is also known to repress the IFN signalling. (4) Protease can stabilize the Iκ Bα, in turn, inactivating the NF-κB, a transcription factor for the activation of the inflammatory cytokines. (5) Activation of NF-κB by TNFα is blocked by protease (Devaraj et al. 2007; Frieman et al. 2009; Clementz et al. 2010). Protease inhibitors can bind to the protease, thereby activating the signaling pathway and release of proinflammatory cytokines, and hence are an excellent choice for the anti-viral agent.

The main protease of SARS-CoV-2, referred to as the 3C-like protease (3CLpro), was identified as a target for post-infection drugs in March 2020. 3CLpro enzyme plays a crucial role in the replication and life cycle of the virus. The human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) protease inhibitors lopinavir and ritonavir have evidence of activity against the coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV (Li and Clercq 2020; Kupferschmidt et al. 2020). They have recently been proposed as a potential combination therapy against COVID‑19 (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 2) (Kupferschmidt et al. 2020; Mullard 2020; Mishra et al. 2020). Nevertheless, a recent preliminary study in China of lopinavir/ritonavir combination therapy found no effect in people hospitalized for COVID‑19 (Cao et al. 2020). Efforts are currently directed towards identifying novel protease inhibitors that target the protease 3CLpro, such as GC376 (Supplementary Table 2) (Ramajayam et al. 2011; Morse et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020). Other protease inhibitors include bromhexine hydrochloride (Table 3), which reduced patients’ mortality rate with COVID-19 (Ansarin et al. 2020). Besides, it can reduce infection, which could be used to treat COVID-19 as a prophylactic treatment (Ansarin et al. 2020). Oral camostat mesylate is another prophylactic option for treatment COVID-19 treatment (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 2). Research findings have shown that it prevents the SARS-CoV-2 entry into the hosts, indicating its potential effectiveness in treatment (Hoffmann et al. 2020).

Role of drug repurposing in the field of drug discovery

The global pharmaceutical industries face many challenges, including attenuation of the drugs and higher cost due to an increased number of years to bring a drug to the market and changes in the regulatory requirements (Pammolli et al. 2011; Waring et al. 2015). Drug repurpositioning is also known as the reprofiling or repositioning of drugs. It is an approach to identify novel uses of the already established or approved drug to treat a new disease other than the first indication (Ashburn and Thor 2004). In the early days, drug repurposing has been mostly expedient; once a drug is discovered, and the drug shows its effect on different sites other than the targeted site, it was taken for commercial manipulation (Pushpakom et al. 2019). The advantages of the drug repurposing approaches are: (1) the risk of drug failure is shallow because the drug used for repositioning was already proven to be reasonably safe enough in pre-clinical, experimental models and also in the clinical trials; (2) the time entailed for the development of a drug can also be reduced because of the pre-clinical testing and safety assessment, which has already been completed; and (3) only less fund is required for the development of a repurposing drug, depending on the stage and also the procedure of development (Breckenridge and Jacob 2019). The regulatory and phase III trial cost may remain the same, but the cost of phase I and II trial can be reduced or saved.

Drug repurposing approach to treat COVID-19

Researchers have started testing existing anti-viral drugs that are widely used to treat HIV in hopes that they might be able to fight the COVID-19 (Supplementary Table 2). A randomized controlled trial of the combination of ritonavir and lopinavir, an anti-HIV drug, is also being tested (Huang et al. 2020a). The trials with other identified anti-viral drugs against other viral diseases like Ebola may benefit from another anti-viral testing. The use of marketed drugs whose safety profile is known could be used as adjuncts to monotherapy. Combinatorial therapies with cyclosporin, ribavirin, lopinavir-ritonavir, interferon beta-1b, remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies can be tested to prevent or curb the infection (Beigel et al. 2019; Singh et al. 2020). The replication of coronavirus and release in cytoplasm forms a replicase complex that is then processed proteolytically into NSPs by viral proteases (van Boheemen et al. 2012; Kilianski et al. 2013). This makes it an excellent choice to inhibit replicating the virus and henceforth the viral assembly and its release. Since no specific drug or vaccine is identified and approved when we wrote the manuscript for COVID-19 treatment, the best medication to be followed is a repurposing of anti-viral drugs. There must be an imminent need to control the widespread SARS-CoV-2 transmission repurposing as an effective treatment to prevent the rapid spread.

Current COVID-19 vaccine candidates

Several promising candidate vaccines have been developed by researchers, which have shown efficacy in phase trials II and III; 166 candidate vaccines are in pre-clinical evaluation, and 56 vaccines are in the clinical evaluation as of December 16, 2020. Figure 4 Summarizes candidate COVID-19 vaccines in pre-clinical and clinical trials (WHO 2020b). A detailed description of the vaccines can be found in Table 4 and Supplementary Table 3. Four candidate vaccines have cleared phase III trials (Moderna’s mRNA-1273, Pfizer/BioNTech’s BNT162b2, Gamaleya’s Sputnik V vaccine University-Oxford & AstraZeneca’s AZD1222). On December 11, 2020, and December 18, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines, respectively (Table 4, Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 4

Candidate COVID-19 vaccines in both clinical and pre-clinical development. Diverse categories of pre-clinical and clinical research COVID‑19 vaccine candidates are currently in development. APC: antigen-presenting cells.

Source: World Health Organization (WHO). The COVID-19 Candidate Vaccine Landscape (WHO 2020b)

Table 4

Candidate vaccines in clinical trials as of WHO data, 16 December 2020

Developers	Vaccine platform acronym	Type of candidate vaccine	Number of doses	Dosing schedule	Route of administration	Phase
Sinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd	IV	SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated)	2	Day 0 + 14	IM	Phase III
Sinopharm + Wuhan Institute of Biological Products	IV	Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase III
Sinopharm + Beijing Institute of Biological Products	IV	Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase III
AstraZeneca + University of Oxford	VVnr	ChAdOx1-S—(AZD1222) (Covishield)	1–2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase III
CanSino Biological Inc./Beijing Institute of Biotechnology	VVnr	Recombinant novel coronavirus vaccine (Adenovirus type 5 vector)	1	Day 0	IM	Phase III
Gamaleya Research Institute; Health Ministry of the Russian Federation	VVnr	Gam-COVID-Vac Adeno-based (rAd26-S + rAd5-S)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase III
Janssen Pharmaceutica	VVnr	Ad26.COV2.S	1–2	Day 0 or Day 0 + 56	IM	Phase III
Novavax	PS	SARS-CoV-2 rS/Matrix M1-Adjuvant (Full length recombinant SARS CoV-2 glycoprotein nanoparticle vaccine adjuvanted with Matrix M)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase III
Moderna + National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)	RNA	mRNA -1273	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase III
BioNTech + Fosun Pharma; Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control + Pfizer	RNA	BNT162 (3 LNP-mRNAs)	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase II/III
Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical + Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences	PS	Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CHO Cell)	2–3	Day 0 + 28 or Day 0 + 28 + 56	IM	Phase III
Curevac AG	RNA	CVnCoV Vaccine	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase II
Institute of Medical Biology + Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences	IV	SARS-CoV-2 vaccine	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I/II
Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems, Rep of Kazakhstan	IV	QazCovid-in®—COVID-19 inactivated vaccine	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase I/II
Inovio Pharmaceuticals + International Vaccine Institute	DNA	INO-4800 + electroporation	2	Day 0 + 28	ID	Phase II/III
AnGes + Takara Bio + Osaka University	DNA	AG0301-COVID19	2	Day 0 + 14	IM	Phase I/II
Cadila Healthcare Ltd	DNA	nCov vaccine	3	Day 0 + 28 + 56	ID	Phase I/II
Genexine Consortium	DNA	GX-19	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I/II
Bharat Biotech International Limited	IV	Whole-Virion Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (BBV152)	2	Day 0 + 14	IM	Phase III
Kentucky Bioprocessing Inc	PS	KBP-COVID-19 (RBD-based)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase I/II
Sanofi Pasteur + GSK	PS	SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulation 1 with adjuvant 1 (S protein (baculovirus production)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase I/II
Arcturus Therapeutics	RNA	ARCT-021	ND	ND	IM	Phase I/II
Serum Institute of India + Accelagen Pty	VLP	RBD SARS-CoV-2 HBsAg VLP vaccine	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I/II
Shenzhen Kangtai Biological Products Co., Ltd	IV	Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero cell)	1,2 or 3	ND	IM	Phase II
ReiThera + Leukocare + Univercells	VVnr	GRAd-COV2 (Replication defective Simian Adenovirus (GRAd) encoding S)	1	Day 0	IM	Phase I
Vaxart	VVnr	VXA-CoV2-1 Ad5 adjuvanted Oral Vaccine platform	2	Day 0 + 28	Oral	Phase I
University of Munich (Ludwig-Maximilians)	VVnr	MVA-SARS-2-S	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I
Clover Biopharmaceuticals Inc./GSK/Dynavax	PS	SCB-2019 + AS03 or CpG 1018 adjuvant plus Alum adjuvant (Native like Trimeric subunit Spike Protein vaccine)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase I
Vaxine Pty Ltd. + Medytox	PS	COVID19 vaccine	1	Day 0	IM	Phase I
CSL Ltd. + Seqirus + University of Queensland	PS	MF59 adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp vaccine	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I
Medigen Vaccine Biologics + Dynavax + National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)	PS	MVC-COV1901 (S-2P protein + CpG 1018)	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I
Instituto Finlay de Vacunas	PS	FINLAY-FR anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (RBD + adjuvant)	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I/II
Federal Budgetary Research Institution State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology "Vector"	PS	EpiVacCorona (EpiVacCorona vaccine based on peptide antigens for the prevention of COVID-19)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase I/II
West China Hospital + Sichuan University	PS	RBD (baculovirus production expressed in Sf9 cells) Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Sf9 Cell)	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase II
University Hospital Tuebingen	PS	IMP CoVac-1 (SARS-CoV-2 HLA-DR peptides)	1	Day 0	SC	Phase I
COVAXX + United Biomedical Inc	PS	UB-612 (Multitope peptide based S1-RBD-protein based vaccine)	2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I
Merck & Co. + Themis + Sharp & Dohme + Institute Pasteur + Univeristy of Pittsburgh	VVr	V591-001—Measles-vector based (TMV-o38)	1–2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I/II
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Prevention and Control	VVr	DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT1 (Intranasal flu-based-RBD)	1	Day 0	IN	Phase II
Imperial College London	RNA	LNP-nCoVsaRNA	2	ND	IM	Phase I
Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital + Center for disease control and Prevention of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region	RNA	SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine	2	Day 0 + 14 or Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I
Medicago Inc	VLP	Coronavirus-Like Particle COVID-19 (CoVLP)	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase II/III
Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute	VVr + APC	Covid-19/aAPC vaccine. The Covid-19/aAPC vaccine is prepared by applying lentivirus modification with immune-modulatory genes and the viral minigenes to the artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPCs)	3	Day 0 + 14 + 28	SC	Phase I
Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute	VVnr + APC	LV-SMENP-DC vaccine. Dendritic cells are modified with lentivirus vectors expressing Covid-19 minigene SMENP and immune-modulatory genes. CTLs are activated by LV-DC presenting Covid-19 specific antigens	1	Day 0	SC & IV	Phase I/II
Barbara Carlson, University of Oklahoma	PS	(SHINGRIX) Zoster Vaccine Recombinant, Adjuvanted	2	Day 0 + 60	IM	Phase I
Adimmune Corporation	PS	AdimrSC-2f (recombinant RBD ± Aluminium)	ND	ND	ND	Phase I
Entos Pharmaceuticals Inc	DNA	Covigenix VAX-001	2	Day 0 + 14	IM	Phase I
Providence Health & Services	DNA	CORVax	2	Day 0 + 14	ID	Phase I
Chulalongkorn University	RNA	ChulaCov19 mRNA vaccine	2	Day 0 + 21	IM	Phase I
Symvivo Corporation	DNA	bacTRL-Spike	1	Day 0	Oral	Phase I
ImmunityBio, Inc	VVnr	hAd5-S-Fusion + N-ETSD vaccine	1	Day 0	Oral	Phase I
City of Hope Medical Center + National Cancer Institute	VVnr	COH04S1 (MVA-SARS-2-S)	1–2	Day 0 + 28	IM	Phase I
Israel Institute for Biological Research	VVr	rVSV-SARS-CoV-2-S Vaccine	1	Day 0	IM	Phase I
Aivita Biomedical, Inc	VVr + APC	Dendritic cell vaccine AV-COVID-19. A vaccine consisting of autologous dendritic cells loaded with antigens from SARS-CoV-2, with or without GM-CSF	1	Day 0	IM	Phase I/II
Codagenix/Serum Institute of India	LAV	COVI-VAC	1–2	Day 0 or Day 0 + 28	IN	Phase I
Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB)	PS	CIGB-669 (RBD + AgnHB)	3	Day 0 + 14 + 28 or Day 0 + 28 + 56	IN	Phase I/II
Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB)	PS	CIGB-66 (RBD + aluminium hydroxide)	3	Day 0 + 14 + 28 or Day 0 + 28 + 56	IM	Phase I/II

ND No data, LAV Live attenuated virus, IV Inactivated virus, PS Protein subunit, RNA RNA based vaccine, DNA DNA based vaccine, VLP Virus like particle, VVr Viral vector (Replicating), VVnr Viral vector (Non−replicating), APC Antigen presenting cell, IM Intramuscular, ID Intradermal, SC Subcutaneous, IV Intravenous, IN Injectable

Source: World Health Organization (WHO), The COVID−19 Candidate Vaccine Landscape (WHO 2020b)

Future outlook

The on-going outbreak of COVID-19 induced by the novel SARS-CoV-2 has put the world on red caution as it continues spreading and causing more fatalities. Exploration endeavors are being completed to diminish the SARS-CoV-2 and its variants from spreading. Discovering medications is commonly known as a long process that takes time. Different computer-aided drug designs (CADD) are assessed as promising strategies among all these structure-based medication plans. Ligand-based medication configuration approaches are known as valuable and ground-breaking procedures in tranquilize revelation advancement. These strategies can be applied with atomic docking to virtual screening for potential lead identification and enhancement. Currently, computational instruments are utilized in pharmaceutical ventures and examination regions to improve the medication disclosure and advancement pipeline’s viability and adequacy. On the other hand, understanding the host-virus relationships and transcriptomic profiles of COVID-19 patients will prioritize gene targets that will lead to developing therapeutic drugs (Alsamman and Zayed 2020).

Conclusion

The COVID-19 outbreak has put health systems on a red alert as it quickly spreads globally. Old individuals and patients with chronic diseases are at high risk of developing severe symptoms and potential death from COVID-19. Researchers worldwide are struggling and trying hard to find effective treatments for COVID-19. In addition, drug repurposing can be achieved using existing FDA-approved anti-viral drugs for COVID-19. Since the described drugs are FDA-approved, their efficacy in treating the infection is expected to be less toxic to patients. This could lower the disease’s severity in elderly patients and protect lives. The Mpro, S glycoproteins, PLpro, RdRp, and 3CLpro of COVID-19 can be targeted using novel inhibitors or existing drug inhibitors to disable its infection ability altogether. Furthermore, the nanoemulsions, nanospheres, nanoparticles, nano-gels, liposomes, and nanosuspensions can be used for anti-viral drug delivery. This also defines and proposes an approach to address existing key challenges, thus directing scientists worldwide to perhaps refining the delivery of nano-based drugs as a strategy to combat virus outbreaks successfully. Further understanding of the molecular pathology of COVID-19 is expected to help in the discovery and development of drugs against COVID-19.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 88 KB)