Literature DB >> 32404480

Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

Sidonie Lambert-Niclot1,2, Alexis Cuffel3, Samuel Le Pape4, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous4, Laurence Morand-Joubert5,2, Anne-Marie Roque-Afonso4, Jérôme Le Goff3,6, Constance Delaugerre3,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARS-CoV-2; antigen; rapid diagnostic test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32404480      PMCID: PMC7383555          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00977-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


× No keyword cloud information.

LETTER

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was reported for the first time in Wuhan (Hubei Province, China) in December 2019 (1, 2) and has become a major public health concern all over the world. Early diagnosis is crucial for patient management and outbreak control. Most tests currently used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 rely on viral RNA amplification by using real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and require a few hours before result release. Hence, highly sensitive immunological diagnostic methods that directly detect viral antigens in clinical samples would be very helpful for rapid and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19. Here, we evaluated a rapid diagnostic test, COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip (Coris BioConcept, Gembloux, Belgium), for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasopharyngeal secretions. The assay is ready to use and based on a nitrocellulose membrane technology with colloidal gold nanoparticles sensitized with monoclonal antibodies directed against highly conserved SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein antigens. We compared this test with RT-PCR, the current reference assay in virology laboratories of three university hospital groups from Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) (Saint-Antoine-Tenon-Trousseau, Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, and Kremlin Bicêtre-Paul Brousse). Different RT-PCR methods were used (RealStar [Altona Diagnostics], Bosphore novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) detection kit [Anatolia Geneworks], Cobas 6800 [Roche], Allplex 2019 novel CoV assay [Seegene]). All assays amplify the SARS-CoV-2 E gene. Cycle threshold (C) values were recorded. Nasopharyngeal samples were tested prospectively within a few hours after collection and without any cooling or freezing step, from 1 April to 15 April 2020. Swabs were collected in various transport media (COPAN’s UTM [3 ml], Virocult [1 ml], ESwab Amies [1 ml], 4MRT [3 ml], 0.9% NaCl buffer, and cobas [Roche]). The first four samples collected in cobas medium tested gave invalid results. We therefore excluded such samples from the study. Our analysis included 138 nasopharyngeal samples, of which 94 (68.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Compared to that of RT-PCR, the specificity of the test was 100% (95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 91.8 to 100). Among the 94 RT-PCR-positive samples, the rapid test detected only 47 specimens, resulting in a sensitivity of 50.0% (95 CI, 39.5 to 60.5). In nine positive and eight negative tests, control lines were barely visible. Medians of E gene C values differed significantly between positive (median = 21; interquartile range [IQR], 17.0 to 23.0) and negative (median = 28.3; IQR, 25.6 to 33.0) antigenic test results (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1). A study conducted by the manufacturer mentioned a sensitivity of 76.7% for samples positive with a C value under 25 (3). In our study, the test had a sensitivity of 82.2% for C values under 25.
FIG 1

COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip (Coris) results according to real-time PCR C values. All cycle threshold values of E gene real-time PCR-positive assays are shown for positive and negative COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip assay results. Results gathering C values for all real-time PCR-positive assays are depicted by squares. C values between samples positive or negative for the antigenic assay are significantly different (* indicates a P value of <0.0001). C values corresponding to the Cobas 6800, Allplex, Anatolia, and RealStar assays are depicted by triangles, diamonds, circles, and upside-down triangles, respectively.

COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip (Coris) results according to real-time PCR C values. All cycle threshold values of E gene real-time PCR-positive assays are shown for positive and negative COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip assay results. Results gathering C values for all real-time PCR-positive assays are depicted by squares. C values between samples positive or negative for the antigenic assay are significantly different (* indicates a P value of <0.0001). C values corresponding to the Cobas 6800, Allplex, Anatolia, and RealStar assays are depicted by triangles, diamonds, circles, and upside-down triangles, respectively. In our study, the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip (Coris) had a sensitivity of 50% compare to that of RT-PCR. The test was more sensitive for high viral loads and might perhaps be used for patients within a few days after symptom onset, when the load in the upper respiratory tract is at its peak. Considering COVID-19’s current low prevalence of 0.19% in France, prospective studies should be conducted to determine the best settings for its implementation.
  3 in total

1.  Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context.

Authors:  Pascal Mertens; Nathalie De Vos; Delphine Martiny; Christian Jassoy; Ali Mirazimi; Lize Cuypers; Sigi Van den Wijngaert; Vanessa Monteil; Pierrette Melin; Karolien Stoffels; Nicolas Yin; Davide Mileto; Sabrina Delaunoy; Henri Magein; Katrien Lagrou; Justine Bouzet; Gabriela Serrano; Magali Wautier; Thierry Leclipteux; Marc Van Ranst; Olivier Vandenberg
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-08

2.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

  3 in total
  77 in total

Review 1.  Tools and Techniques for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/COVID-19 Detection.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Safiabadi Tali; Jason J LeBlanc; Zubi Sadiq; Oyejide Damilola Oyewunmi; Carolina Camargo; Bahareh Nikpour; Narges Armanfard; Selena M Sagan; Sana Jahanshahi-Anbuhi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Utility of Antigen-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Routine Hospital Settings.

Authors:  Preeti Thakur; Sonal Saxena; Vikas Manchanda; Neha Rana; Ruchi Goel; Ritu Arora
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2021-11-02

Review 3.  Review of Current COVID-19 Diagnostics and Opportunities for Further Development.

Authors:  Yan Mardian; Herman Kosasih; Muhammad Karyana; Aaron Neal; Chuen-Yen Lau
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-07

4.  Highly specific monoclonal antibodies and epitope identification against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein for antigen detection tests.

Authors:  Yutaro Yamaoka; Kei Miyakawa; Sundararaj Stanleyraj Jeremiah; Rikako Funabashi; Koji Okudela; Sayaka Kikuchi; Junichi Katada; Atsuhiko Wada; Toshiki Takei; Mayuko Nishi; Kohei Shimizu; Hiroki Ozawa; Shuzo Usuku; Chiharu Kawakami; Nobuko Tanaka; Takeshi Morita; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Hideaki Mitsui; Keita Suzuki; Daisuke Aizawa; Yukihiro Yoshimura; Tomoyuki Miyazaki; Etsuko Yamazaki; Tadaki Suzuki; Hirokazu Kimura; Hideaki Shimizu; Nobuhiko Okabe; Hideki Hasegawa; Akihide Ryo
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-05-16

Review 5.  Back to basics in COVID-19: Antigens and antibodies-Completing the puzzle.

Authors:  Monica Neagu; Daniela Calina; Anca Oana Docea; Carolina Constantin; Tommaso Filippini; Marco Vinceti; Nikolaos Drakoulis; Konstantinos Poulas; Taxiarchis Konstantinos Nikolouzakis; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristidis Tsatsakis
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Comparative evaluation of Panbio and SD Biosensor antigen rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Authors:  Felipe Pérez-García; Juan Romanyk; Helena Moya Gutiérrez; Andrea Labrador Ballestero; Inés Pérez Ranz; Javier González Arroyo; Victoria González Ventosa; Ramón Pérez-Tanoira; Concepción Domingo Cruz; Juan Cuadros-González
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  Frontline Screening for SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Emergency Department Admission by Third Generation Rapid Antigen Test: Can We Spare RT-qPCR?

Authors:  Valeria Cento; Silvia Renica; Elisa Matarazzo; Maria Antonello; Luna Colagrossi; Federica Di Ruscio; Arianna Pani; Diana Fanti; Chiara Vismara; Massimo Puoti; Francesco Scaglione; Carlo Federico Perno; Claudia Alteri
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Diagnostic performance of rapid antigen test for COVID-19 and the effect of viral load, sampling time, subject's clinical and laboratory parameters on test accuracy.

Authors:  Rania M Amer; Mohamed Samir; Osama A Gaber; Nahawand A El-Deeb; Ahmed A Abdelmoaty; Alshymaa A Ahmed; Walaa Samy; Amal H Atta; Mohammad Walaa; Reham H Anis
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Accuracy of a Novel SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test from Standardized Self-Collected Anterior Nasal Swabs.

Authors:  Bilgin Osmanodja; Klemens Budde; Daniel Zickler; Marcel G Naik; Jörg Hofmann; Maximilian Gertler; Claudia Hülso; Heike Rössig; Philipp Horn; Joachim Seybold; Stephanie Lunow; Melanie Bothmann; Astrid Barrera-Pesek; Manuel Mayrdorfer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Pneumonia Caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 and Influenza Virus: A Multicenter Comparative Study.

Authors:  Issei Oi; Isao Ito; Masataka Hirabayashi; Kazuo Endo; Masahito Emura; Toru Kojima; Hitokazu Tsukao; Keisuke Tomii; Atsushi Nakagawa; Kojiro Otsuka; Masaya Akai; Masahiro Oi; Takakazu Sugita; Motonari Fukui; Daiki Inoue; Yoshinori Hasegawa; Kenichi Takahashi; Hiroaki Yasui; Kohei Fujita; Tadashi Ishida; Akihiro Ito; Hideo Kita; Yusuke Kaji; Michiko Tsuchiya; Hiromi Tomioka; Takashi Yamada; Satoru Terada; Hitoshi Nakaji; Nobuyoshi Hamao; Masahiro Shirata; Kensuke Nishioka; Masatoshi Yamazoe; Yusuke Shiraishi; Tatsuya Ogimoto; Kazutaka Hosoya; Hitomi Ajimizu; Hiroshi Shima; Hisako Matsumoto; Naoya Tanabe; Toyohiro Hirai
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.