Literature DB >> 33814670

Investigation of the efficacy of a data-driven CT artifact correction scheme for sparse and truncated projection data for intracranial hemorrhage diagnosis.

Alexander R Podgorsak1,2,3, Mohammad Mahdi Shiraz Bhurwani1,3, Ciprian N Ionita1,2,3.   

Abstract

Data-driven CT-image reconstruction techniques for truncated or sparsely acquired projection data to reduce radiation dose, iodine volume, and patient motion artifacts have been proposed. These approaches have shown good performance and preservation of image quality metrics. To continue these efforts, we investigated whether these techniques affect the performance of a machine-learning algorithm to identify the presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Ten-thousand head CT scans were collected from the 2019 RSNA Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection and Classification Challenge dataset. Sinograms were simulated and then resampled in both a one-third truncated and one-third sparse manner. GANs were tasked with correcting the incomplete projection data in two ways. Firstly, in the sinogram domain, where the incomplete sinogram was filled by the GAN and then reconstructed. Secondly, in the reconstruction domain, where the incomplete data were first reconstructed and the sparse or truncation artifacts were corrected by the GAN. Eighty-five hundred images were used for artifact correction network training, and 1500 were withheld for network assessment via an already trained machine-learning algorithm tasked with diagnosis of ICH presence. Fully-sampled reconstructions were compared with the sparse and truncated reconstructions for classification accuracy. Difference in classification accuracy between the fully sampled (83.4%), sparse (82.0%), and truncated (82.3%) reconstructions was minimal, demonstrating that the network diagnosis performance is unaffected by 2/3 reduction of projection data. This work indicates that data-driven reconstructions for a sparse or truncated projection dataset can provide high diagnostic performance for ICH detection at a fraction of the typical radiation dose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT artifact correction; intracranial hemorrhage detection; machine learning classification

Year:  2021        PMID: 33814670      PMCID: PMC8018695          DOI: 10.1117/12.2580899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  21 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  NCRP Report No. 160, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, medical exposure--are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists?

Authors:  D A Schauer; O W Linton
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  David Volders; Alain Bols; Marc Haspeslagh; Kenneth Coenegrachts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets.

Authors:  Guang-Hong Chen; Jie Tang; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Fast and flexible X-ray tomography using the ASTRA toolbox.

Authors:  Wim van Aarle; Willem Jan Palenstijn; Jeroen Cant; Eline Janssens; Folkert Bleichrodt; Andrei Dabravolski; Jan De Beenhouwer; K Joost Batenburg; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Addressing Burnout in Radiologists.

Authors:  Alison L Chetlen; Tiffany L Chan; David H Ballard; L Alexandre Frigini; Andrea Hildebrand; Shannon Kim; James M Brian; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Ultralow-dose computed tomography imaging for surgery of midfacial and orbital fractures using ASIR and MBIR.

Authors:  G Widmann; D Dalla Torre; R Hoermann; P Schullian; E M Gassner; R Bale; W Puelacher
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for flat-panel cone-beam CT with focal spot blur, detector blur, and correlated noise.

Authors:  Steven Tilley; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Does iterative reconstruction lower CT radiation dose: evaluation of 15,000 examinations.

Authors:  Peter B Noël; Bernhard Renger; Martin Fiebich; Daniela Münzel; Alexander A Fingerle; Ernst J Rummeny; Martin Dobritz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Iterative image reconstruction for sparse-view CT using normal-dose image induced total variation prior.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Yunwan Zhang; Jianhua Ma; Dong Zeng; Zhaoying Bian; Shanzhou Niu; Qianjin Feng; Zhengrong Liang; Wufan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.