| Literature DB >> 33804948 |
Mengliang Zhao1,2,3, Yanjing Ren2,3, Wei Wei1, Jiaming Yang1, Qiwen Zhong2,3, Zheng Li1.
Abstract
Jerusalem artichokes are a perennial crop with high drought tolerance and high value as a raw material to produce biofuels, functional feed, and food. However, there are few comprehensive metabolomic studies on Jerusalem artichokes under drought conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Jerusalem artichoke; drought stress; metabolic network; metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804948 PMCID: PMC8037225 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Physiological changes of Jerusalem artichoke in response to drought stress. (a) Changes of the stem and leaves dry weight/fresh weight from 0 to 48 h; (b) changes of the stem and leaves fresh weight/root fresh weight from 0 to 48 h; (c) changes of the water content of stems and leaves from 0 to 48 h; (d) changes of the survival rate in the Jerusalem artichoke from 0 to 48 h.
Figure 2The morphology of Jerusalem Artichokes treated with drought stress, and the heatmap of correlation and principal component analysis (PCA) between different drought treatment and quality control (QC) samples. (a) 0 h; (b) 18 h; (c) 24 h; (d) 36 h; (e) Principal component analysis. (f) Heatmap of correlation.
Figure 3Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS–DA) scores. Scores of the OPLS–DA model with (a) 0 vs. 18 h, (b) 18 vs. 24 h, (c) 24 vs. 36 h. OPLS–DA S-plot model with (d) 0 vs. 18 h, (e) 18 vs. 24 h, (f) 24 vs. 36 h. R2 Y scores and Q2 values represent the interpretation rate of the model to the Y matrix and the prediction ability of the model, respectively. When Q2 > 0.5, the model can be considered an effective model, and Q2 > 0.9 is an excellent model.
Figure 4Differential metabolite analysis of Jerusalem artichokes under drought conditions. Volcano maps of differential metabolites in different pairwise comparisons: (a) 0 vs. 18 h; (b) 18 vs. 24 h; (c) 24 vs. 36 h; (d) 0 vs. 24 h; (e) 0 vs. 36 h; (f) 18 vs. 36 h. (g) Venn diagram of differential metabolites in a multiple pairwise comparison of 0 vs. 18 h, 18 vs. 24 h, and 24 vs. 36 h. (h) Venn diagram of differential metabolites in multiple pairwise comparisons of 0 vs. 18 h, 0 vs. 24 h and 0 vs. 36 h. (i) Trend analysis of differential metabolites during the treatment of drought stress from 0 to 36 h.
Number of differential metabolites in the leaves of Jerusalem artichoke with drought stress.
| Group Class | 0 vs. 18 h | 18 vs. 24 h | 24 vs. 36 h | 0 vs. 24 h | 0 vs. 36 h | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | Up | Down | |
| Amino acid and its derivatives | 18 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 28 | 3 | 27 | 1 |
| Phenolic acids | 12 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 14 | 20 | 11 | 4 |
| Organic acids | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
| lipids | 10 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 10 |
| Nucleotide and its derivates | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Lignans and coumarins | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Flavonoids | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 2 |
| Alkaloids | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Tannins | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Terpenoids | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Others | 12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 3 |
| Total | 95 | 55 | 46 | 182 | 112 | |||||
Figure 5Analysis of metabolic networks in the leaves of Jerusalem artichoke under drought stress. Proposed metabolic pathways were based on the literature and web-based database of metabolic pathways. The metabolites written in gray were not detected in this study. The differential metabolite changes were represented by the log2 ratio. Blue represents a decrease in content and red represents an increase in content. * indicates a significant difference.