| Literature DB >> 33804630 |
Magdalena Paczkowska-Walendowska1, Jakub Dvořák2,3, Natalia Rosiak1, Ewa Tykarska4, Emilia Szymańska5, Katarzyna Winnicka5, Marek A Ruchała6, Judyta Cielecka-Piontek1.
Abstract
The health benefits of resveratrol have been proven to inhibit the development ofEntities:
Keywords: buccal tablets; cyclodextrins; mucoadhesion; resveratrol
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804630 PMCID: PMC8003728 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13030417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
The composition of tablet formulations.
| F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complexation method | DM | DM | DM | DM | Evap |
| Content (mg) of compounds in one tablet | |||||
| RSV | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| α-CD | 85.0 | - | - | - | - |
| β-CD | - | 99.0 | - | - | - |
| γ-CD | - | - | 128.0 | - | - |
| HP-β-CD | - | - | - | 114.0 | 114.0 |
| xanthan gum | 10.5 | 11.9 | 14.8 | 13.4 | 13.4 |
| magnesium stearate | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| sum | 116.7 | 132.2 | 164.4 | 148.9 | 148.9 |
Figure 1X-ray diffractograms of the solid samples. 2θ positions of the principal diffraction peaks are shown for RSV, whereas the traces of crystalline RSV peaks in the systems are indicated by “*”.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of selected powder resveratrol (RSV)/cyclodextrin (CD) systems.
Figure 3Chromatogram of RSV (c = 40 µg mL−1).
Figure 4Powder dissolution of RSV from the powder CD systems at pH 6.8.
Figure 5The permeability values of pure RSV and its CDs systems.
Figure 6Tabletability (a), compressibility (b) and compactibility (c) profiles of the RSV cyclodextrin systems (F1-RSV/α-CD 1:1 DM, F2-RSV/β-CD 1:1 DM, F3-RSV/γ-CD 1:1 DM, F4-RSV/HP-β-CD 1:1 DM, F5-RSV/HP-β-CD 1:1 Evap).
Figure 7Dissolution profiles of the RSV/CD tablets (F1–F5) with the compression pressure 150 MPa.
Figure 8The effect of the polymer concentration (2–10%) on the viscosity component due to bioadhesion for formulations F1–F5 at a rate of shear 93 1/s (a), and the effect of the rate of shear on the viscosity component due to bioadhesion for 5% of formulations F1–F5 (b).
Figure 9Maximum detachment force (a) and work of mucoadhesion (b) of tablets with resveratrol (F1–F5) compressed at different compaction forces (7.5 or 10 kN). Values are expressed as a mean ± SD; * represents significant differences with p ≤ 0.05, ** with p ≤ 0.01 while *** p ≤ 0.001 in comparison to control (cellulose paper, PC); † symbolizes significant differences with p ≤ 0.05 between the formulation compressed at 7.5 or 10 kN corresponding to the compression pressure 150 and 200 MPa, respectively.
Residence time (expressed in min) of tablets with resveratrol F1–F5 differed in compaction force to the porcine buccal mucosa (n = 3; median).
| Compression Pressure | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 MPa | >180 | >180 | 120 | 10 | >180 |
| 200 MPa | >180 | >180 | 100 | 10 | >180 |