Literature DB >> 1694990

A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength.

E E Hassan1, J M Gallo.   

Abstract

A simple viscometric method was used to quantify mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Viscosities of 15% (w/v) porcine gastric mucin dispersions in 0.1 N HCl (pH 1) or 0.1 N acetate buffer (pH 5.5) were measured with a Brookfield viscometer in the absence (eta m) or presence (eta t) of selected neutral, anionic, and cationic polymers (0.1-2.5%, w/v). Viscosity components of bioadhesion (eta b) were calculated from the equation, eta t = eta m + eta p + eta b, where eta p is the viscosity of corresponding pure polymer solution as measured by an Ostwald viscometer. The forces of bioadhesion (F) were calculated from the equation, F = eta b sigma, where sigma is the rate of shear/sec. eta b's and F's for polyelectrolytes, e.g., polyacrylic acid, cationic gelatin, and chitosan were always higher in acetate buffer than in HCl. Validity of the technique and the effect of ionic charge, polymer conformation, and rate of shear on eta b and F are discussed, as is a comparison of this method to other methods for evaluating bioadhesive materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1694990     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015812615635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  9 in total

1.  Interaction of mucins with calcium, H+ ion and albumin.

Authors:  J F Forstner; I Jabbal; B P Findlay; G G Forstner
Journal:  Mod Probl Paediatr       Date:  1976 Oct 24-27

2.  Enhancement of the viscosity of mucin by serum albumin.

Authors:  S J List; B P Findlay; G G Forstner; J F Forstner
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1978-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery.

Authors:  J D Smart; I W Kellaway; H E Worthington
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.765

4.  New mucosal dosage form of insulin.

Authors:  M Ishida; Y Machida; N Nambu; T Nagai
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Intraocular-lens-endothelial interface: adhesive force measurements.

Authors:  S Reich; M Levy; A Meshorer; M Blumental; M Yalon; J W Sheets; E P Goldberg
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-09

6.  POLYELECTROLYTES AND THEIR BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS.

Authors:  A KATCHALSKY
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure-property relationships.

Authors:  J M Gu; J R Robinson; S H Leung
Journal:  Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.889

8.  On two-dimensional passive random walk in lipid bilayers and fluid pathways in biomembranes.

Authors:  H J Galla; W Hartmann; U Theilen; E Sackmann
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1979-07-31       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery II: synthesis and evaluation of some swelling, water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers.

Authors:  H S Ch'ng; H Park; P Kelly; J R Robinson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.534

  9 in total
  54 in total

1.  Model-based interpretation of creep profiles for the assessment of polymer-mucin interaction.

Authors:  S Rossi; M C Bonferoni; C Caramella; L Ironi; S Tentoni
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  In vitro test to evaluate the interaction between synthetic cervical mucus and vaginal formulations.

Authors:  Bríd T Burruano; Roger L Schnaare; Daniel Malamud
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Ovomucin nanoparticles: promising carriers for mucosal delivery of drugs and bioactive compounds.

Authors:  Ali Akbari; Jianping Wu
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.617

4.  Evaluation of polymer mucoadhesiveness by the use of acoustic spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marco Cespi; Giulia Bonacucina; Giovanna Mencarelli; Gianfabio Giorgioni; Giovanni Filippo Palmieri
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Preparation and evaluation of oleoyl-carboxymethy-chitosan (OCMCS) nanoparticles as oral protein carriers.

Authors:  Ya Liu; Xiao Jie Cheng; Qi Feng Dang; Fang Kui Ma; Xi Guang Chen; Hyun Jin Park; Bum Keun Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Formulation development and evaluation of innovative two-polymer (SR-2P) bioadhesive vaginal gel.

Authors:  Satheesh Podaralla; Carsten Alt; Gita N Shankar
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Novel acid-activated fluorophores reveal a dynamic wave of protons in the intestine of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Aaron Bender; Zachary R Woydziak; Liqiang Fu; Michael Branden; Zhenguo Zhou; Brian D Ackley; Blake R Peterson
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.100

8.  Cationic Polyelectrolyte Nanocapsules of Moxifloxacin for Microbial Keratitis Therapy: Development, Characterization, and Pharmacodynamic Study.

Authors:  Parasuraman Mohan; Karthikeyan Kesavan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 9.  Nanomedicines for back of the eye drug delivery, gene delivery, and imaging.

Authors:  Uday B Kompella; Aniruddha C Amrite; Rashmi Pacha Ravi; Shelley A Durazo
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 21.198

10.  Mucoadhesion of copolymers and mixtures containing polyacrylic acid.

Authors:  F Thermes; J Grove; A Rozier; B Plazonnet; A Constancis; C Bunel; J P Vairon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.