Literature DB >> 33800789

Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns.

Sara Spinelli1, John Prescott1,2, Lapo Pierguidi1, Caterina Dinnella1, Elena Arena3, Ada Braghieri4, Rossella Di Monaco5, Tullia Gallina Toschi6, Isabella Endrizzi7, Cristina Proserpio8, Luisa Torri9, Erminio Monteleone1.   

Abstract

The consumption of phenol-rich foods is limited by their prominent bitterness and astringency. This issue has been addressed by adding sweet tastes, which suppress bitterness, but this is not a complete solution since individuals also differ in their preference for sweetness. In this study, we aimed at identifying groups of consumers differing in sweetness optima and sensory-liking patterns. To this end, increasing concentrations of sucrose were added to a chocolate pudding base. This allowed us to (1) investigate if individual differences in sensory responses are associated with different sweet liking optima in a product context, (2) define the psychological and oro-sensory profile of sweet liker phenotypes derived using a product context, and (3) assess if individuals differing in sweet liking optima differ also in consumption and liking of phenol-rich foods and beverages as a function of their sensory properties (e.g., sweeter vs. more bitter and astringent products). Individuals (1208; 58.4% women, 18-69 years) were characterised for demographics, responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), personality traits and attitudes toward foods. Three clusters were identified based on correlations between sensory responses (sweetness, bitterness and astringency) and liking of the samples: liking was positively related to sweetness and negatively to bitterness and astringency in High and Moderate Sweet Likers, and the opposite in Inverted U-Shaped. Differences between clusters were found in age, gender and personality. Furthermore, the Inverted-U Shaped cluster was found to have overall healthier food behaviours and preferences, with higher liking and consumption of phenol-rich vegetables and beverages without added sugar. These findings point out the importance of identifying the individual sensory-liking patterns in order to develop more effective strategies to promote the acceptability of healthy phenol-rich foods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROP; individual differences; personality traits; phenol-rich foods; sensory-liking patterns; sweet liking

Year:  2021        PMID: 33800789      PMCID: PMC7998421          DOI: 10.3390/nu13030866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrients        ISSN: 2072-6643            Impact factor:   5.717


  65 in total

Review 1.  The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-05-20

2.  Invisible fats: sensory assessment of sugar/fat mixtures.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; M Schwartz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters.

Authors:  J Prescott; N Ripandelli; I Wakeling
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure.

Authors:  R M Bagby; J D Parker; G J Taylor
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Effects of body weight and food intake on pleasantness ratings for a sweet stimulus.

Authors:  D A Thompson; H R Moskowitz; R G Campbell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet.

Authors:  H Looy; H P Weingarten
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-07

8.  Behavioral measures of risk tasking, sensation seeking and sensitivity to reward may reflect different motivations for spicy food liking and consumption.

Authors:  Nadia K Byrnes; John E Hayes
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Influences of Psychological Traits and PROP Taster Status on Familiarity with and Choice of Phenol-Rich Foods and Beverages.

Authors:  Alessandra De Toffoli; Sara Spinelli; Erminio Monteleone; Elena Arena; Rossella Di Monaco; Isabella Endrizzi; Tullia Gallina Toschi; Monica Laureati; Fabio Napolitano; Luisa Torri; Caterina Dinnella
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Emotional eating during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Exploring the roles of alexithymia and emotion dysregulation.

Authors:  Katherine McAtamney; Michail Mantzios; Helen Egan; Deborah J Wallis
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relationships between Intensity and Liking for Chemosensory Stimuli in Food Models: A Large-Scale Consumer Segmentation.

Authors:  Isabella Endrizzi; Danny Cliceri; Leonardo Menghi; Eugenio Aprea; Mathilde Charles; Erminio Monteleone; Caterina Dinnella; Sara Spinelli; Ella Pagliarini; Monica Laureati; Luisa Torri; Alessandra Bendini; Tullia Gallina Toschi; Fiorella Sinesio; Stefano Predieri; Flavia Gasperi
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 2.  Therapeutic Properties and Use of Extra Virgin Olive Oil in Clinical Nutrition: A Narrative Review and Literature Update.

Authors:  Andrés Jiménez-Sánchez; Antonio Jesús Martínez-Ortega; Pablo Jesús Remón-Ruiz; Ana Piñar-Gutiérrez; José Luis Pereira-Cunill; Pedro Pablo García-Luna
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Characterizing Individual Differences in Sweet Taste Hedonics: Test Methods, Locations, and Stimuli.

Authors:  May M Cheung; Matthew Kramer; Gary K Beauchamp; Sari Puputti; Paul M Wise
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.