Literature DB >> 26002822

The sweetness and bitterness of childhood: Insights from basic research on taste preferences.

Julie A Mennella1, Nuala K Bobowski2.   

Abstract

In this article, we review findings from basic, experimental research on children that suggest that the liking of sweet and the dislike of bitter tastes reflect children's basic biology. Children are born preferring sweet tastes, which attract them to mother's milk and even act as an analgesic. They prefer higher levels of sweet than do adults, with preferences declining to adult levels during middle to late adolescence, which coincides with the cessation of physical growth. The level of sweetness most preferred by children has remained heightened relative to adults for nearly a decade, despite reductions in sugar, both consumed and in the food environment. In spite of these reductions, however, children's intake of sugar remains higher than that recommended by health organizations worldwide. In contrast to sweet taste, children dislike and reject bitter taste, which protects them from ingesting poisons. Although variation in bitter taste receptor genes such as TAS2R38 accounts for people's marked differences in perceptions of the same bitter-tasting compounds, basic research revealed that these genotype-phenotype relationships are modified with age, with children of the same genotype being more bitter sensitive than adults and the changeover occurring during mid-adolescence. This heightened bitter sensitivity is also evident in the taste of the foods (green vegetables) or medicines (liquid formulations of drugs) they dislike and reject. While bitter taste can be masked or blocked to varying degrees by sugars and salts, their efficacy in modulating bitterness is not only based on the type of bitter ligand but on the person's age. Children's heightened preference for sweet and dislike of bitter, though often detrimental in the modern food environment, reflects their basic biology. Increasing knowledge of individual variation in taste due to both age and genetics will shed light on potential strategies to promote healthier eating since chronic diseases derive in large part from poor food choice dictated by taste preferences, and will contribute to a new era of drug formulations designed especially for the taste palate of children.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Diet; Genetic variation; Learning; Taste

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002822      PMCID: PMC4654709          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  76 in total

Review 1.  Oral and postoral determinants of food reward.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-07

2.  Early exposure to dietary sugar and salt.

Authors:  Susan S Baker; Robert D Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Gustation assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Susan E Coldwell; Julie A Mennella; Valerie B Duffy; Marcia L Pelchat; James W Griffith; Gregory Smutzer; Beverly J Cowart; Paul A S Breslin; Linda M Bartoshuk; Lloyd Hastings; David Victorson; Howard J Hoffman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Congenital and experiential factors in the development of human flavor preferences.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; B J Cowart
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Neonates' heart rate, sucking rhythm, and sucking amplitude as a function of the sweet taste.

Authors:  D H Ashmead; B M Reilly; L P Lipsitt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1980-04

6.  Dietary influences on the development of sucrose acceptability in rats.

Authors:  M Bertino; F Wehmer
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 7.  Diverse tastes: Genetics of sweet and bitter perception.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed; Toshiko Tanaka; Amanda H McDaniel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-06-19

8.  Evaluation of the Monell forced-choice, paired-comparison tracking procedure for determining sweet taste preferences across the lifespan.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Laura D Lukasewycz; James W Griffith; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 9.  Pediatric reference intervals for bone markers.

Authors:  Liju Yang; Vijaylaxmi Grey
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.281

10.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  49 in total

1.  Tobacco industry's investment in sweetness comes full circle.

Authors:  Sven-Eric Jordt; Sairam Jabba
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-10

Review 2.  The Issue of Aversion in Lifestyle Treatments.

Authors:  Katherine R Arlinghaus; John P Foreyt; Craig A Johnston
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2016-12-16

3.  Exclusively drinking sucrose or saline early in life alters adult drinking behavior by laboratory rats.

Authors:  K Linnea Volcko; Destiny J Brakey; John T Przybysz; Derek Daniels
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Use of Adult Sensory Panel to Study Individual Differences in the Palatability of a Pediatric HIV Treatment Drug.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Phoebe S Mathew; Elizabeth D Lowenthal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Personal Variation in Preference for Sweetness: Effects of Age and Obesity.

Authors:  Nuala Bobowski; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 6.  The development of sweet taste: From biology to hedonics.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Psychophysical Tracking Method to Measure Taste Preferences in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Understanding the metabolic and health effects of low-calorie sweeteners: methodological considerations and implications for future research.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Jenny E Blau; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 9.  National Institutes of Health Update: Translating Basic Behavioral Science into New Pediatric Obesity Interventions.

Authors:  Susan M Czajkowski
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.278

10.  Sweeteners are added to modify consumer behaviour.

Authors:  Sven E Jordt; Sairam Jabba
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.