Literature DB >> 11595676

Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters.

J Prescott1, N Ripandelli, I Wakeling.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the mutual, but asymmetric, suppression of the components in binary taste mixtures is an invariant property of the human psychophysical response to such mixtures. However, taste intensities have been shown to vary as a function of individual differences in sensitivity, indexed by the perceived bitterness of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). To determine if these variations in taste perception influence taste mixture interactions, groups of PROP super-, medium- and non-tasters assessed four binary taste mixtures: sweet-bitter [sucrose/quinine hydrochloride (QHCl)], sweet-sour (sucrose/citric acid), salty-bitter (NaCl/QHCl) and salty-sour (NaCl/citric acid). In each experiment, subjects received factorial combinations of four levels of each of two tastants and rated individual taste intensities and overall mixture intensity. For each taste quality, super-tasters typically gave higher ratings than either medium- or non-tasters, who tended not to differ. There were also group differences in the interactions of the mixtures' components. Super-tasters rated the overall intensity of the mixtures, most likely reflecting integration of the taste components, as greater than medium- and non-tasters, who again showed few differences. In sweet-bitter mixtures, non-tasters failed to show the suppression of sweetness intensity by the highest QHCl concentration that was evident in super- and medium-tasters. These data show that the perception of both tastes and binary taste mixture interactions varies as a function of PROP taster status, but that this may only be evident when three taster groups are clearly distinguished from one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11595676     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/26.8.993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  9 in total

1.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Howard R Moskowitz; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Taste mixture interactions: suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Juyun Lim; Floor Osterhoff; Karen Blacher; Danielle Nachtigal
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-08-24

4.  The effect of barium on perceptions of taste intensity and palatability.

Authors:  Angela M Dietsch; Nancy Pearl Solomon; Catriona M Steele; Cathy A Pelletier
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Factors affecting detection of bimodal sour-savory mixture and inter-individual umami taste perception.

Authors:  Anjelica M Miranda; Michael Ingram; Tiffany M Nuessle; Stephanie A Santorico; Nicole L Garneau
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.

Authors:  May Wee; Vicki Tan; Ciarán Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  New insights into the relationship between taste perception and oral microbiota composition.

Authors:  Simone Guglielmetti; Ella Pagliarini; Camilla Cattaneo; Giorgio Gargari; Ranjan Koirala; Monica Laureati; Patrizia Riso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sensory sweetness and sourness interactive response of sucrose-citric acid mixture based on synergy and antagonism.

Authors:  Yuezhong Mao; Shiyi Tian; Yumei Qin; Shiwen Chen
Journal:  NPJ Sci Food       Date:  2022-07-19

9.  Phenol-Rich Food Acceptability: The Influence of Variations in Sweetness Optima and Sensory-Liking Patterns.

Authors:  Sara Spinelli; John Prescott; Lapo Pierguidi; Caterina Dinnella; Elena Arena; Ada Braghieri; Rossella Di Monaco; Tullia Gallina Toschi; Isabella Endrizzi; Cristina Proserpio; Luisa Torri; Erminio Monteleone
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.