| Literature DB >> 33800650 |
Karina Romeu Montenegro1, Milene Amarante Pufal2, Philip Newsholme1.
Abstract
Aging is associated with impairment in skeletal muscle mass and contractile function, predisposing to fat mass gain, insulin resistance and diabetes. The impact of Vitamin D (VitD) supplementation on skeletal muscle mass and function in older adults is still controversial. The aim of this review was to summarize data from randomized clinical trials, animal dietary intervention and cell studies in order to clarify current knowledge on the effects of VitD on skeletal muscle as reported for these three types of experiments. A structured research of the literature in Medline via PubMed was conducted and a total of 43 articles were analysed (cells n = 18, animals n = 13 and humans n = 13). The results as described by these key studies demonstrate, overall, at cell and animal levels, that VitD treatments had positive effects on the development of muscle fibres in cells in culture, skeletal muscle force and hypertrophy. Vitamin D supplementation appears to regulate not only lipid and mitochondrial muscle metabolism but also to have a direct effect on glucose metabolism and insulin driven signalling. However, considering the human perspective, results revealed a predominance of null effects of the vitamin on muscle in the ageing population, but experimental design may have influenced the study outcome in humans. Well-designed long duration double-blinded trials, standardised VitD dosing regimen, larger sample sized studies and standardised measurements may be helpful tools to accurately determine results and compare to those observed in cells and animal dietary intervention models.Entities:
Keywords: Vitamin D; aging; calcitriol; muscle cells; skeletal muscle function
Year: 2021 PMID: 33800650 PMCID: PMC8066691 DOI: 10.3390/nu13041110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1PRISMA flow diagram of research stages.
Overview of the effects of vitamin D (VitD) in skeletal muscle cells (n = 18 in vitro studies) stratified by outcome.
| The authors, | Cell Line/Type | Maturation | VitD Dose, Form, | Significant Findings and Effects | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myotube formation, muscle mass, strength and force | |||||
| Braga et al., | Mice satellite cells | Myoblasts | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, | ↑ MYOD, MYOG, MYC2, skeletal muscle fast troponin I and T, MYH1, IGF1 IGF2, FGF1 and 2, BMP4, MMP9 and FST. | VitD3 promoted a robust myogenic effect on satellite cells responsible for the regeneration of muscle after injury or muscle waste. |
| Romeu et al., 2019 [ | HSMM | Myoblasts and myotubes | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, | ↑ differentiation by altering the expression of myogenic regulatory factors. ↑ protein synthesis signalling and synthesis (AKT, mTOR, GSK3B); ↑ OCR in myoblasts and myotubes. | At day 6, there were notably higher |
| Hosoyama et al., | Mouse Ric10 and human myogenic cell clone Hu5KD3 | Myoblasts and myotubes | 1000 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | Induced hypertrophy of multinucleated myotubes by stimulating protein anabolism | ↓ expression of MRFs, Myf5 and myogenin in proliferating myoblasts. High concentration of VitD reduced myoblast-to-myoblast and myoblast-to-myotube fusion through the inhibition of Tmem8c (myomaker) and Gm7325 (myomerger). |
| Muscle function and protein synthesis | |||||
| Hayakawa et al., | HSMM | Myotubes | 10 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24/48/or 72 h | ↑ interleukin-6 expression and inhibited expression of TNF-α, MAFbx, MuRF1 and ubiquitin ligases involved in muscle atrophy after VitD3 treatment. | VitD3 suppresses muscle degradation and its likely to be involved in the regulation of apoptosis, insulin responsiveness and myogenesis in skeletal muscle. |
| Van der Meijden et al., 2016 [ | C2C12 | Myoblasts and myotubes | 0/400/1000/or 2000 nmol/L, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | Myoblasts and myotubes were able to convert 25(OH)D3 to 24,25(OH)2D3 locally (skeletal muscle); ↑ VDR and MHC mRNA expression. | Skeletal muscle is not only a direct target for VitD3 metabolites, but is also to its precursor. |
| Antinozzi et al., 2017 [ | Human fetal skeletal muscle cells | Myoblasts | 10/or 100 nM, Elocalcitol, 1–24 h | Elocalcitol exerted an I-like effect, promoting GLUT4 re-localization in Flotillin-1, Caveolin-3 and Caveolin-1 positive sites and mTOR, AKT, ERK, 4E-BP1 activation; it enhanced Interleukin-6 myokine release. | VDR agonists as elocalcitol may be therapeutic tools for skeletal muscle integrity/function maintenance, an indispensable condition for health homeostasis. |
| Hirose et al., | C2C12 | Myoblasts | 1000 and 10,000 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | ↓ FOXO1-mediated; glucocorticoid-induced gene expression of atrogin 1 and cathepsin L | VitD3 may prevent muscle atrophy via the FOXO1-mediated pathway in muscle cells. |
| Arakawa & Wagatsuma, 2020 [ | C2C12 | Myotubes | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | Enhanced agrin- induced AChR clustering in myotubes compared to treatment with agrin alone. | VitD3 -VDR signalling may regulate rapsin expression, resulting in the up-regulation of agrin- induced AChR clustering. |
| Mitochondria and lipid metabolism | |||||
| Ryan et al., | C2C12 | Myotubes | 0.1–10000 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, ≤ 6 d | Low physiological concentrations (10K13 and 10K11 M) of VitD3 increased fat droplet accumulation; high physiological (10K9 M) and supraphysiological concentrations (R10K7 M) inhibited fat accumulation. | Low VitD concentration was associated with a sequential up-regulation of Pparg2 and Fabp4 mRNA, indicating formation of adipocytes, whereas higher concentrations reduced all these effects. |
| Jefferson et al., 2017 [ | C2C12 | Myotubes | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 96 h | ↑ insulin-stimulated | VitD3 altered myocellular lipid partitioning and lipid droplet packaging, lipid turnover and partially explained improvements in insulin sensitivity. |
| Chang & Kim, | C2C12 | Myotubes | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | ↑ ATP levels and mitochondrial function gene expression: CPT1, PPARα, VLCAD, LCAD, MCAD, UCP2 and UCP3. ↑ SIRT1 mRNA expression, ↑ activation of AMPK and SIRT1 | Protective effect of VitD3 on muscle fat accumulation and mitochondrial dysfunction ↑ mtDNA, NRF1, PGC-1α and mitochondrial transcription factor A (Tfam) in C2C12 myotubes. |
| Schnell et al., | C2C12 | Myotubes | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | ↑ mitochondrial function in myotubes (↑ lipolytic genes ATGL and CGI-58, OCR | ↑ mRNA expression of triglyceride synthesizing genes DGAT1 and DGAT2; in part mediated by Perilipin-2 |
| Glucose and insulin metabolism | |||||
| Manna et al., | C2C12 | Myotubes | 25 or 50 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 2 h | VitD3 + insulin ↑ GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake | VitD3 ↑ glucose consumption by inducing SIRT1 activation, which in turn increases IRS1 phosphorylation and GLUT4 translocation in myotubes. |
| Tamilselvan et al., | L6 | Myotubes | 100 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 24 h | ↑ GLUT1, GLUT4, VDR and insulin receptor expression. | Potential antidiabetic role of VitD in regulation of expression of the glucose transporters in muscle cells. |
| Antinozzi et al., | Human fetal skeletal muscle cells | Myoblasts | 10 and 100 nM, Elocalcitol, 15 min | Elocalcitol induced GLUT4 protein translocation likely in lipid raft microdomains; rapid IRS1 phosphorylation; inflammatory myopathy subjects, | Elocalcitol might be a therapeutic tool for skeletal |
| Oxidative stress and AGES | |||||
| Tanaka et al., | C2C12 | Myoblasts | 0.1 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 48 h | ↑ expression of type 1 collagen; AGE2 and AGE3 suppressed the expression of MyoD, myogenin and OGN. 1,25D blunted the AGEs’ effects. | VitD3 may rescue the AGEs-induced sarcopenia as well as–suppressed osteoblastic differentiation via OGN expression in myoblasts. |
| Chang et al., | C2C12 | Myotubes | 1, 10 and 100 nM, | ↑ mtDNA, PGC1α, NRF1, Tfam, NRF2, NAD levels, activities of AMPK, SIRT1, expression of HMOX1 and TXNRD1. | ↓ muscle oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, intracellular damage and cell |
| Nonaka et al., | C2C12 | Myotubes | 0/0.1/1/or 10 nM, 1,25(OH)2D, 4 d | VitD3 inhibited increases in Interleukin-6 protein, suggesting that VitD3 inhibits inflammation in muscle cells. | VitD3 can prevent or improve sarcopenia, which is associated with interleukin-6. |
VitD3 = cholecalciferol; mtDNA = Mitochondrial DNA; PGC1α = proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha; NRF1 = Nuclear Respiratory Factor 1; Tfam = Mitochondrial transcription factor A; NRF2 = Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2; NAD = Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; AMPK = 5’ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; SIRT1 = Sirtulin 1; HMOX1 = Heme Oxygenase 1; TXNRD1 = Thioredoxin Reductase 1; ATP = Adenosine triphosphate; CPT1 = carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1; PPARα peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α; VLCAD = very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; LCAD = Long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; MCAD = medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; UCP2 = uncoupling protein 2; UCP3 = uncoupling protein 3; FOXO1 = Forkhead box protein O1; Atrogin-1 = muscle-specific F-box protein; Cathepsin L = lysosomal endopeptidase enzyme; AKT = Protein kinase B; mTOR = mammalian target of rapamycin; GSK3B = Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; OCR = oxygen consumption rate; ATGL = Adipose triglyceride lipase; CGI-58 = Comparative Gene Identification (activator of triglyceride hydrolases and as acyl-CoA); DGAT1 = Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase 1; DGAT2 = Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2; Perilipin-2: Adipose differentiation-related protein; GLUT = Glucose transporter (type 1, 4); IRS1 = Insulin receptor substrate 1; MYOD = myoblast determination protein 1; MYOG = Myogenin; MYC2 = transcription factor; MYH1 = Myosin heavy chain 1; IGF1 and 2 = Insulin-like growth factor; FGF1 and 2 = acidic fibroblast growth factor; BMP4 = Bone morphogenetic protein 4; MMP9 = 92 kDa type IV collagenase; FST = gene encoded Follistatin; VDR = Vitamin D receptor; MHC = Major histocompatibility complex; AGEs: advanced glycation end products; OGN = Osteoglycin; ERK = Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; TNF-α = of tumor necrosis factor alpha; MAFbx = muscle atrophy F-box; MuRF1 = muscle RING-finger protein-1; Pparg2 = Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; Fabp4 = Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4; AChR = acetylcholine receptor; LPS = Lipopolysaccharide; MRFs = myogenic regulatory factors; Myf5 = Myogenic factor 5. ↑ = statistically increased (between groups analysis); ↓ = statistically decreased (between groups analysis).
Overview of the effects of vitamin D (VitD) in skeletal muscle (n = 13 animal studies) stratified by outcome.
| The authors, | Specie, N, | Groups (VitD Form and Dose), | Significant Findings and Effects | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myotube formation, muscle mass, strength and force | ||||
| Ray et al., | A/J mice, | G1 (Low, 100 IU); G2 (Reference, 1000 IU); G3 (10,000 IU 1,25(OH)2D/kg), | Low VitD3 group had ↓ maximal diaphragm (DIA) force, twitch force and fiber CSA (26%, 28% and 10% respectively). | Potential role of VitD3 in regulating DIA development and insulin sensitivity. |
| Trovato et al., | Sprague/Dawley rats, | RD (regular diet); R-DS (R + 4000 IU/KgVitD); RDR = regular diet without VitD; HFB-DS (high-fat diet +VitD); HFB-DR (high-fat w/o VitD); HFEVO-DS (high-fat + VitD); HFEVO-DR (high-fat + w/o VitD),10 weeks | Muscle fibres of high fat diet + VitD3 rats were hypertrophic comparing to those of regular diet + VitD3. | VitD associated with a Mediterranean diet showed trophic action on the muscle fibres. |
| Hayes et al., | C57BL/6J mice | Control (standard chow + 1000 IU/kgVitD3); High (same diet with 20,000 IU/kg of 25-hydroxyvitamin D); YEAR (injected bolus of 1500 IU25-hydroxyvitamin D) | YEAR ↓ forces in both muscles compared to High, as well as lower force during fatigue and early recovery. | Mice ingesting the same amount of food + VitD3 over four weeks did not demonstrate the same detrimental effects. |
| Muscle function and protein synthesis | ||||
| Alkharfy et al., | C57BL/6J mice, | Low fat diet (LFD); High fat diet (HFD) with and without 150 IU/kg/day 1,25(OH)2D, | HFD with VitD3 showed less weight gain as compared to controls (6.8% vs. 28.7%, respectively). | Muscle structural abnormalities caused by HFD were attenuated by VitD3; tissues have regained their normal structural appearance. |
| Gifondorwa et al., 2016 [ | C57BL/6J mice, | G1 (VitD+/Ca+: 1000 IU/kg/0.50%); G2 (VitD+/Ca-1000 IU/kg/0.01%); G3 (VitD-/Ca+: 0 IU/kg/0.47%); G4: (Vit. D2-/Ca-: 0.02%; 0 IU/kg), | VitD3 lead to metabolic changes, NMJ-related and protein chaperoning and refolding genes. | VitD deficient or a VitD and Ca+2 deficient diet resulted in detrimental changes in the structure and function of the NMJ. |
| Nakamura et al., 2020 [ | C57BL/6J mice, | Standard (S) diet, High 1,25(OH)2D diet = (VitD3 and Ca: 0.47%, P: 0.3%,) and Low 1,25(OH)2D diet = (Ca: 2%, P: 1.25%), | VitD low status worsens immobilization-induced muscle atrophy in mice. Mice globally lacking VDR exhibited more severe muscle atrophy following limb immobilization than controls. | Maintaining VitD status at an appropriate level before injury or decline in physical activity is likely crucial to prevent deterioration and muscle atrophy. |
| Mitochondria and lipid metabolism | ||||
| Fan et al., | C57BL/6J mice, | NFD (control normal-fat diet); HFD (high-fat diet); HFVD (45 kcal % fat; 50 μg/kg body weight/d 25-hydroxyvitamin D),9 weeks | HFVD ↓ body weight and adipose tissue weight and ↑ expression of UCP3 compared to the other groups. | Changes in the expression of genes correlated with VitD3/VDR. VitD3/VDR inhibits weight gain by activating UCP3 in the muscles. |
| Chanet et al., | Wistar rats, | Control (1 IU VitD3/g); VitD-depleted [VDD, diet 0 IU | Weight gain was associated with ↑ in fat mass (+63%, p < 0.05), intramyocellular lipids (+75%, p < 0.05) in VDD. | VitD3 deficiency in old rats ↑ adiposity and leads to reduced muscle protein synthesis through activation of eIF2α. These disorders are restored by VitD3. |
| Glucose and insulin metabolism | ||||
| Benetti et al., | C57BL/6J mice, | Control or High Fat-High Sugar (HFHS) diet for 4 months; Then, another subset of animals: 1,25(OH)2D (7 μg/kg−1, 3 times a week) for 2 months | VitD3 ↓ body weight and ↑ systemic glucose tolerance. VitD3 restored the impaired muscle insulin signalling and reverted myosteatosis diet-induced. | VitD3 ↓ activation NFKB and ↓ TNFα, ↓ activation of the SCAP/SREBP lipogenic pathway, ↓ CML protein adducts and RAGE expression. |
| Nadimi et al., | Sprague-Dawley rats, | G1 (healthy control); G2 (healthy receiving sesame oil as placebo); G3 (diabetics receiving sesame oil as placebo); G4 (diabetics treated with 4300 IU/kg/week native cholecalciferol), | VitD ↑ FNDC5 gene expression and muscle irisin levels. | Potential therapeutic effect of VitD3 supplementation for diabetes mellitus. |
| Xavier et al., | Wistar rats, | 12 μg/kg VitD3 to (a) control; (b) diabetic; (c) insulin-treated diabetic; (d) 1,25(OH)2D -treated diabetic; (e) curcumin-treated diabetic rats, | ↑ β2-adrenoceptor and CREB gene expression were observed in the diabetic group and ↓ insulin receptor expression, resulting in ↑ glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis and ↓ glycogenesis in the muscles. | These results were reversed with VitD3 and curcumin treatment. VitD3 and curcumin might help in the management of peripheral complications associated with diabetes. |
| Kim et al., | p62-deficient mice, | Control (no treatment); cholecalciferol = 1000 IU VitD3/kg/d), RT = ladder climbing, 3 times per week or combined treatment, VRT = VitD3 + RT), | Total body mass increased in all groups, but fat mass increased only in control group. Loss of skeletal muscle function was reported only in control group. Improved blood glucose levels and ↓ spleen mass was reported in RT and VRT compared to control. | VitD3 attenuated the progression of obesity and preserved skeletal muscle function. |
| Akagawa et al., 2018 [ | Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima sedentary fatty rats | ALF (alfacalcidol 0.1 μg/kg/day); Exe (low-intensity aerobic exercise training); Comb (alfacalcidol + low-intensity aerobic exercise training); T2DM control group, | ALF, Exe and Comb treatments for 2 and 6 weeks recovered the CSA compared to Control. ALF and Comb for 6 weeks increased femoral BMD compared to Control. ALF or Exe monotherapy significantly decreased Atrogin-1 or MuRF1 expression after 2 weeks. After 6 weeks, ALF and Comb decreased Atrogin-1 and REDD1. | A combination of ALF and Exe improved CSA from the early phase of treatment by stimulating skeletal muscle differentiation and suppressing muscle catabolic genes. Improvements in blood glucose, BMD and CSA were observed as long-term effects of the combination therapy. |
VitD3 = cholecalciferol; NMJ = neuromuscular junction; NFKB = major transcription factor; TNF-α = of tumor necrosis factor alpha; SCAP/SREBP = cleavage-activating protein; CML = carboxymethyllysine; RAGE = receptor for advanced glycation end products; UCP3 = uncoupling protein 3; VDR = Vitamin D receptor; CSA = cross-sectional area; DIA = diaphragm Eif2α = Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2; FNDC5 = fibronectin type III domain containing 5; CREB = cellular transcription factor; MuRF1 = muscle RING-finger protein-1; REDD1 = regulated in development and DNA damage responses ; BMD = bone mineral density; Ca+2 = calcium ion. ↑ = statistically increased (between groups analysis); ↓ = statistically decreased (between groups analysis).
Overview of the effects of vitamin D (VitD) in skeletal muscle in an aging population (n = 13).
| The authors, Year | Male/ | Baseline Serum [25(OH)D] | N | Dose (IU) | Type | Frequency | Duration (weeks) | INTERVENTION Outcomes | N | PLACEBO Outcomes | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Hajj et al., 2018 [ | 59/56 | Deficient | 60 | 10000 | Cholecalciferol | 3x/week | 24 | 55 | Serum [25(OH)D] had significantly change at the end of the study between groups. | ||
| Bislev LS et al., 2018 [ | 0/81 | Deficient | 40 | 2800 | Cholecalciferol | daily | 12 | ↓ Handgrip (N) | 41 | ↑ Handgrip (N) | Serum [25(OH)D] had significantly change at the end of the study between groups. |
| Shea MK et al., 2019 [ | 64/36 | Deficient | 47 | 800–1600 | Cholecalciferol | daily | 48 | 50 | At the 4-mo visit, if a participant from VitD group had serum [25(OH)D] <28 ng/mL, it was given an additional VitD3 capsule (800 IU)/day. To everyone else was given an additional placebo pill. There was only significant change on serum [25(OH)D] at the end of the study between groups. | ||
| Vaes AMM et al., 2018 [ | 43/32 | Deficient | 24 | 800 | Cholecalciferol | daily | 24 | 25 | 3 intervention groups: 25(OH)D3, VitD3 and placebo. In both treatment with VitD, serum [25(OH)D] increased. | ||
| Grimnes G et al., 2019 [ | 219/192 | Deficient | 208 | 20000 | Cholecalciferol | 1/week | 16 | 203 | There was only a change in serum [25(OH)D] at the end of the study between groups. | ||
| Van Vliet S et al., 2020 [ | 6/11 | Sufficient or Insufficient | 9 | 2000 | Cholecalciferol | daily | 8 | 8 | There was only increase in serum [25(OH)D] at the end on the treatment group. | ||
| Cuellar WA et al., 2019 [ | 113/104 | Deficient to Sufficient | 104 | 50000 | Cholecalciferol | 1 capsule/ | 96 | 113 | Serum [25(OH) D] in the VitD group increased more at the end of the study. | ||
| Ceglia L et al., 2013 [ | 0/21 | Insufficient | 9 | 4000 | Cholecalciferol | Daily | 16 | 12 | There was a significant increase in serum [25(OH)D] in the vitamin D compared with placebo group at the end of the study. | ||
| Latham NK et al., 2003 [ | 114/129 | Deficient | 108 | 300000 | calciferol | single dose | 24 | 114 | The single dose of VitD was effective only in increasing mean [25(OH)D] in the intervention group at the end of the study. | ||
| Dhesi JK et al., 2004 [ | 30/108 | Deficient | 62 | 600000 | ergocalciferol | single intramuscular injection | 24 | 61 | Serum [25(OH)D] increased significantly in the end of the study in the treatment group. | ||
| Pirotta S et al., 2015 [ | 13/13 | Insufficient | 13 | 2000 | Cholecalciferol | daily | 10 | 12 | At the end of the study, only serum [25(OH)D] increased at the end of the study in the vitamin D group. | ||
| Wood AD et al., 2014 [ | 0/265 | Insufficient | 84 | 400 | Cholecalciferol | daily | 48 | 91 | 3 intervention groups: low VitD3 dose, high VitD3 dose and placebo. Serum [25(OH)D] > 60 nmol/L in both VitD3 groups. |
VitD3 = cholecalciferol; ↔ = no statistical difference between groups; ↑ = statistically increased (between groups analysis); ↓ = statistically decreased (between groups analysis); N = newton; MET = metabolic equivalent of task; W = watts; 1RM = 1 repetition maximum; 25(OH)D3 = 25-hydroxycholecalciferol; SPPB = short physical performance battery; Nm = newton meters; BMI = body mass index; %∆ = percent change; FCSA = fibre cross- sectional area; [VDR] = VitD receptor concentration; MVC (maximal voluntary contraction); KE = knee extension.