| Literature DB >> 22850324 |
Khalid M Alkharfy1, Nasser M Al-Daghri, Mukhtar Ahmed, Sobhy M Yakout.
Abstract
Vitamin D is well known for its role in maintaining calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and in promoting bone mineralization; however, more of its pleiotropic effects have been described recently. The aim of the present investigation was to study the effect of vitamin D treatment on skeletal muscles changes under different dietary conditions using an animal model. Four groups of C57BL/6J mice (n = 11 each) were maintained on either low fat diet (LFD) or high fat diet (HFD) with and without 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) for 16 weeks. Animal weigh was recorded at baseline and then regular intervals, and at the end of the study, skeletal muscle tissues were harvested for the evaluation of the histopathological and ultrastructural changes. When control C57BL/6J mice were fed high-fat diet for 12 weeks, body weight gain was significantly increased compared with mice fed a LFD. (30.2% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.01). There was a significant gradual decrease in the weight of HFD fed mice that were treated with vitamin D as compared with a steady increase in the weights of controls (6.8% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.01). While the LFD group showed some ultrastructural changes, HDF fed on mice showed great muscle structural abnormalities. The whole sarcosome along with its membrane and cristae were severely damaged with scattered myocytes in HFD group. Furthermore, the mitochondria appeared weak and were on the verge of degenerations. The bands were diminished with loss of connections among myofibrils. These changes were attenuated in the HFD group treated with vitamin D with tissues have regained their normal structural appearance. The current findings indicate an important effect of vitamin D on skeletal muscle histology under HFD conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22850324 PMCID: PMC6268639 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17089081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Histology of muscle samples. (A) Interstitial fibrosis changes in skeletal muscle (×1,000) of Group I. (B) Skeletal muscles with normal architecture (×1,000) of Group II. (C) Skeletal muscles with normal architecture (×1,000) of Group III. (D) Skeletal muscle with wavy appearance fibers (×1,000) of Group IV. (E) Normal architecture of muscle fibers (×1,000) of Control.
Figure 2Electron photomicrographs of muscle samples. (A) Group I, Normal general ultrastructural appearance of skeletal muscle, note damaged cristae of mitochondria (20,000×). (B) Group II, Normal general ultrastructural appearance of skeletal muscle, note normal structure of mitochondria (20,000×). (C) Group III, Different in size and damaged cristae of mitochondria within an intermyofibrillar space (20,000×). (D) Group IV, Normal general ultrastructural appearance of skeletal muscle, with focal edema within an intermyofibrillar space (20,000×). (E) Control, Normal general ultrastructural appearance of skeletal muscle, with normal structure of mitochondria(20,000×).