Camille E Powe1, Michele K Evans, Julia Wenger, Alan B Zonderman, Anders H Berg, Michael Nalls, Hector Tamez, Dongsheng Zhang, Ishir Bhan, S Ananth Karumanchi, Neil R Powe, Ravi Thadhani. 1. From the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (C.E.P.), Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital (J.W., H.T., I.B., R.T.), Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School (A.H.B.), Division of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (D.Z., S.A.K.), and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (D.Z., S.A.K.) - all in Boston; the Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore (M.K.E., A.B.Z.); the Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (M.N.); and the Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (N.R.P.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D are common among black Americans. Vitamin D-binding protein has not been considered in the assessment of vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: In the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span cohort of blacks and whites (2085 participants), we measured levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D-binding protein, and parathyroid hormone as well as bone mineral density (BMD). We genotyped study participants for two common polymorphisms in the vitamin D-binding protein gene (rs7041 and rs4588). We estimated levels of bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D in homozygous participants. RESULTS: Mean (±SE) levels of both total 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein were lower in blacks than in whites (total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 15.6±0.2 ng per milliliter vs. 25.8±0.4 ng per milliliter, P<0.001; vitamin D-binding protein, 168±3 μg per milliliter vs. 337±5 μg per milliliter, P<0.001). Genetic polymorphisms independently appeared to explain 79.4% and 9.9% of the variation in levels of vitamin D-binding protein and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, respectively. BMD was higher in blacks than in whites (1.05±0.01 g per square centimeter vs. 0.94±0.01 g per square centimeter, P<0.001). Levels of parathyroid hormone increased with decreasing levels of total or bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (P<0.001 for both relationships), yet within each quintile of parathyroid hormone concentration, blacks had significantly lower levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D than whites. Among homozygous participants, blacks and whites had similar levels of bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D overall (2.9±0.1 ng per milliliter and 3.1±0.1 ng per milliliter, respectively; P=0.71) and within quintiles of parathyroid hormone concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Community-dwelling black Americans, as compared with whites, had low levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein, resulting in similar concentrations of estimated bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Racial differences in the prevalence of common genetic polymorphisms provide a likely explanation for this observation. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).
BACKGROUND: Low levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D are common among black Americans. Vitamin D-binding protein has not been considered in the assessment of vitamin D deficiency. METHODS: In the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity across the Life Span cohort of blacks and whites (2085 participants), we measured levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D-binding protein, and parathyroid hormone as well as bone mineral density (BMD). We genotyped study participants for two common polymorphisms in the vitamin D-binding protein gene (rs7041 and rs4588). We estimated levels of bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D in homozygous participants. RESULTS: Mean (±SE) levels of both total 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein were lower in blacks than in whites (total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 15.6±0.2 ng per milliliter vs. 25.8±0.4 ng per milliliter, P<0.001; vitamin D-binding protein, 168±3 μg per milliliter vs. 337±5 μg per milliliter, P<0.001). Genetic polymorphisms independently appeared to explain 79.4% and 9.9% of the variation in levels of vitamin D-binding protein and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, respectively. BMD was higher in blacks than in whites (1.05±0.01 g per square centimeter vs. 0.94±0.01 g per square centimeter, P<0.001). Levels of parathyroid hormone increased with decreasing levels of total or bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D (P<0.001 for both relationships), yet within each quintile of parathyroid hormone concentration, blacks had significantly lower levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D than whites. Among homozygous participants, blacks and whites had similar levels of bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D overall (2.9±0.1 ng per milliliter and 3.1±0.1 ng per milliliter, respectively; P=0.71) and within quintiles of parathyroid hormone concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Community-dwelling black Americans, as compared with whites, had low levels of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein, resulting in similar concentrations of estimated bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Racial differences in the prevalence of common genetic polymorphisms provide a likely explanation for this observation. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).
Authors: F F Safadi; P Thornton; H Magiera; B W Hollis; M Gentile; J G Haddad; S A Liebhaber; N E Cooke Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: A Nykjaer; D Dragun; D Walther; H Vorum; C Jacobsen; J Herz; F Melsen; E I Christensen; T E Willnow Journal: Cell Date: 1999-02-19 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: M K Thomas; D M Lloyd-Jones; R I Thadhani; A C Shaw; D J Deraska; B T Kitch; E C Vamvakas; I M Dick; R L Prince; J S Finkelstein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M C Chapuy; M E Arlot; F Duboeuf; J Brun; B Crouzet; S Arnaud; P D Delmas; P J Meunier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: L L N Husemoen; J F Ebstrup; E L Mortensen; P Schwarz; T Skaaby; B H Thuesen; T Jørgensen; A Linneberg Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: T O Jemielita; M B Leonard; J Baker; S Sayed; B S Zemel; J Shults; R Herskovitz; M R Denburg Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Samar R El Khoudary; Saad Samargandy; Irfan Zeb; Temitope Foster; Ian H de Boer; Dong Li; Matthew J Budoff Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: John Aloia; Ruban Dhaliwal; Mageda Mikhail; Albert Shieh; Alexandra Stolberg; Louis Ragolia; Melissa Fazzari; Steven A Abrams Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Daniel V Dudenkov; Kristin C Mara; Tanya M Petterson; Julie A Maxson; Tom D Thacher Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Csaba P Kovesdy; Keith C Norris; L Ebony Boulware; Jun L Lu; Jennie Z Ma; Elani Streja; Miklos Z Molnar; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Pamela L Lutsey; Christina M Parrinello; Jeffrey R Misialek; Andy N Hoofnagle; Clark M Henderson; Thomas J Laha; Erin D Michos; John H Eckfeldt; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: John J Lima; Mario Castro; Tonya S King; Jason E Lang; Victor E Ortega; Stephen P Peters; Loren C Denlinger; Elliot Israel; Christine A Sorkness; Michael E Wechsler; Sally E Wenzel; Lewis J Smith Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 6.347