Literature DB >> 33798655

The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.

Alex T Pham1, Pradeep Y Ramulu1, Michael V Boland2, Jithin Yohannan3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of transitioning from Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard to SITA Faster on visual field (VF) performance in glaucomatous eyes with a broad spectrum of disease severity undergoing longitudinal VF testing in a real-world clinical setting.
DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 421 patients (766 eyes) with manifest or suspect glaucoma followed at a single institution.
METHODS: Each included eye received the following sequence of VF examinations during routine clinical care: (1) SITA Standard, (2) SITA Standard, and (3) SITA Faster (mean time between tests = 13.9 months). Intra-eye comparisons were made between the first 2 VFs (Standard-Standard sequence) and the last 2 VFs (Standard-Faster sequence). The primary dependent variable was the difference in mean deviation (MD) between the second and first VF of the sequence (ΔMD, calculated as MDVF2 - MDVF1). The primary independent variable was the VF sequence (Standard-Standard or Standard-Faster). Linear mixed-effects models were used to study the effect of testing sequence on ΔMD, adjusting for confounders including time between VFs and change in false-positive (FP) errors. Results were stratified to understand the effect of glaucoma severity on the relationship between testing sequence and ΔMD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The difference in ΔMD between Standard-Standard and Standard-Faster sequence by mild, moderate, and advanced disease severity.
RESULTS: In eyes with mild or suspect glaucoma, there was no significant difference in ΔMD between Standard-Faster and Standard-Standard sequences (-0.23 decibels [dB]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.60 to 0.15 dB). However, the Standard-Faster sequence was associated with a 0.87 dB (95% CI, 0.18-1.57 dB) improvement in ΔMD compared with the Standard-Standard sequence in eyes with moderate glaucoma and a 1.49 dB (95% CI, 0.79-2.19 dB) improvement in ΔMD in eyes with advanced glaucoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Converting to SITA Faster in eyes that were previously followed with SITA Standard led to similar VF performance in mild glaucoma but resulted in higher MD values in moderate and advanced glaucoma. For patients with moderate or severe glaucoma, this may conceal disease progression when transitioning testing strategies.
Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mean deviation; SITA Faster; SITA Standard; Visual field

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33798655      PMCID: PMC8463413          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   14.277


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.

Authors:  A K Sharma; I Goldberg; S L Graham; M Mohsin
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Perceived barriers to care and attitudes about vision and eye care: focus groups with older African Americans and eye care providers.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin; Kay Scilley; Christopher A Girkin; Janice M Phillips; Karen Searcey
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Frequency of Testing to Detect Visual Field Progression Derived Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Luke J Saunders; Fábio B Daga; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  Anders Heijl; Vincent Michael Patella; Luke X Chong; Aiko Iwase; Christopher K Leung; Anja Tuulonen; Gary C Lee; Thomas Callan; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Raghavan Lavanya; Mohammed Riyazuddin; Srilakshmi Dasari; Narendra K Puttaiah; Jayasree P Venugopal; Zia S Pradhan; Sathi Devi; Shruthi Sreenivasaiah; Shonraj B Ganeshrao; Harsha L Rao
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Influence of visual field testing frequency on detection of glaucoma progression with trend analyses.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Reza Zarei; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-08

7.  Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1977-08

8.  Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  J Flammer; S M Drance; M Zulauf
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05

9.  Clinical evaluation of SITA: a new family of perimetric testing strategies.

Authors:  S Shirato; R Inoue; K Fukushima; Y Suzuki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and full threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  Y Aoki; G Takahashi; K Kitahara
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.597

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in visual field loss pattern when transitioning from SITA standard to SITA faster.

Authors:  Christopher T Le; Jacob Fiksel; Pradeep Ramulu; Jithin Yohannan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.