Hana Cechova1, Vladimir Kalis2,3,4, Linda Havelkova1, Zdenek Rusavy2,3,4, Pavel Fiala5, Martina Rybarova5, Ludek Hyncik1, Ladislav Krofta6, Khaled M Ismail7,8. 1. New Technologies - Research Centre, University of West Bohemia, Pilsen, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic. 4. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. 5. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. 6. Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 147 00, Prague, Czech Republic. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, alej Svobody 76, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic. khaled.ismail@lfp.cuni.cz. 8. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. khaled.ismail@lfp.cuni.cz.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Several studies have assessed birth-related deformations of the levator ani muscle (LAM) and perineum on models that depicted these elements in isolation. The main aim of this study was to develop a complex female pelvic floor computational model using the finite element method to evaluate points and timing of maximum stress at the LAM and perineum in relation to the birth process. METHODS: A three-dimensional computational model of the female pelvic floor was created and used to simulate vaginal birth based on data from previously described real-life MRI scans. We developed three models: model A (LAM without perineum); model B (perineum without LAM); model C (a combined model with both structures). RESULTS: The maximum stress in the LAM was achieved when the vertex was 9 cm below the ischial spines and measured 37.3 MPa in model A and 88.7 MPa in model C. The maximum stress in the perineum occurred at the time of distension by the suboocipito-frontal diameter and reached 86.7 MPa and 119.6 MPa in models B and C, respectively, while the stress in the posterior fourchette caused by the suboccipito-bregmatic diameter measured 36.9 MPa for model B and 39.8 MPa for model C. CONCLUSIONS: Including perineal structures in a computational birth model simulation affects the level of stress at the LAM. The maximum stress at the LAM and perineum seems to occur when the head is lower than previously anticipated.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Several studies have assessed birth-related deformations of the levator ani muscle (LAM) and perineum on models that depicted these elements in isolation. The main aim of this study was to develop a complex female pelvic floor computational model using the finite element method to evaluate points and timing of maximum stress at the LAM and perineum in relation to the birth process. METHODS: A three-dimensional computational model of the female pelvic floor was created and used to simulate vaginal birth based on data from previously described real-life MRI scans. We developed three models: model A (LAM without perineum); model B (perineum without LAM); model C (a combined model with both structures). RESULTS: The maximum stress in the LAM was achieved when the vertex was 9 cm below the ischial spines and measured 37.3 MPa in model A and 88.7 MPa in model C. The maximum stress in the perineum occurred at the time of distension by the suboocipito-frontal diameter and reached 86.7 MPa and 119.6 MPa in models B and C, respectively, while the stress in the posterior fourchette caused by the suboccipito-bregmatic diameter measured 36.9 MPa for model B and 39.8 MPa for model C. CONCLUSIONS: Including perineal structures in a computational birth model simulation affects the level of stress at the LAM. The maximum stress at the LAM and perineum seems to occur when the head is lower than previously anticipated.
Authors: Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Robert Zemcik; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Dulce A Oliveira; Marco P L Parente; Begoña Calvo; Teresa Mascarenhas; Renato M Natal Jorge Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol Date: 2016-03-22
Authors: Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Sari Räisänen; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Linda Havelková; Ladislav Krofta; Petra Kochová; Václav Liška; Vladimír Kališ; Jaroslav Feyereisl Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Maria C P Vila Pouca; João P S Ferreira; Marco P L Parente; Renato M Natal Jorge; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 10.693