| Literature DB >> 35222179 |
Yiyao Zhang1, Chao Zhang2, Lei Cheng3, Mingwei Qi4.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to apply deep learning to music perception education. Music perception therapy for autistic children using gesture interactive robots based on the concept of educational psychology and deep learning technology is proposed. First, the experimental problems are defined and explained based on the relevant theories of pedagogy. Next, gesture interactive robots and music perception education classrooms are studied based on recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Then, autistic children are treated by music perception, and an electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to collect the music perception effect and disease diagnosis results of children. Due to significant advantages of signal feature extraction and classification, RNN is used to analyze the EEG of autistic children receiving different music perception treatments to improve classification accuracy. The experimental results are as follows. The analysis of EEG signals proves that different people have different perceptions of music, but this difference fluctuates in a certain range. The classification accuracy of the designed model is about 72-94%, and the average classification accuracy is about 85%. The average accuracy of the model for EEG classification of autistic children is 85%, and that of healthy children is 84%. The test results with similar models also prove the excellent performance of the design model. This exploration provides a reference for applying the artificial intelligence (AI) technology in music perception education to diagnose and treat autistic children.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence technology; deep learning; educational psychology; gesture interactive robot; music perception education
Year: 2022 PMID: 35222179 PMCID: PMC8866172 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.762701
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1RNN structure diagram.
FIGURE 2Structure diagram of multilayer reverse neural network.
FIGURE 3Experimental process.
FIGURE 4Denoising flowchart.
Software and hardware settings.
| Items | Equipment status |
| Software | Matlab R2018a |
| System | Win10 |
| CPU | i7-11800H |
| GPU | GeForce GTX 3050 Ti |
| Program | Python 3.9 |
| Hard disk capacity | 16 GB DDR4+512 GB SSD |
Hyperparameter setting of RNN.
| Parameters | Value | Parameters | Value |
| Learning rate | 0.2 | Activation function | Sigmoid function |
| Maximum training times | 1000 | Weight change increment | 1.5 |
| Training required accuracy | 0.00001 | Weight change reduction | 0.7 |
| Minimum gradient requirements | 1.00E-10 | Initial weight change | 0.07 |
| Show training iteration process | 500 | Maximum value of weight change | 100 |
| Loss function | Exponential Loss | Gradient descent algorithm | Nadam algorithm |
FIGURE 5Time-domain diagram of each natural mode component. (A) Components 1 and 2. (B) Components 3 and 4. (C) Components 5 and 6. (D) Components 7 and 8.
FIGURE 6Modal spectrum of each inherent brain signal. (A) Natural modal components 1 and 2. (B) Natural modal components 3 and 4. (C) Natural modal components 5 and 6. (D) Natural modal components 7 and 8.
FIGURE 7Classification accuracy of 10 autistic children.
FIGURE 8Classification accuracy of 10 healthy children.
Performance comparison.
| Algorithm | Autistic children | Healthy children |
| CNN | 57.01% | 60.7% |
| LSTM | 74.45% | 64.87% |
| SVM | 74.76% | 52.87% |
| The designed algorithm | 85.45% | 84.01% |