Literature DB >> 9609331

Vaginal topography does not correlate well with visceral position in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

K Kenton1, S Shott, L Brubaker.   

Abstract

The objective was to determine whether vaginal topography accurately predicts the location of the pelvic viscera on fluoroscopy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Eighty-nine women undergoing preoperative evaluation for reconstructive pelvic surgery at a tertiary care referral practice formed the study population. Each woman completed a comprehensive urogynecologic history and physical examination, which included a quantified (POP-Q) assessment of her vaginal topography, as described by Bump et al. In addition each woman underwent pelvic floor fluoroscopy (PFF). Visceral sites were selected which corresponded clinically to the vaginal sites measured by the POP-Q. The most dependent portion of the bladder, small intestine, rectum and urethrovesical junction was measured. Twenty-five (28%) women had stage II prolapse, 34 (38%) had stage III prolapse, and 28 (32%) had stage IV prolapse. The remaining 2 women were symptomatic, with stage I prolapse. For the entire study population there was no correlation between the fluoroscopic position of the small bowel and/or rectum and any apical or posterior wall POP-Q site (C, Ap or Bp). There was no correlation with the fluoroscopic position of the UVJ at rest or with straining and the corresponding POP-Q site (Aa). The fluoroscopic position of the most dependent portion of the bladder correlated only modestly with the upper (Ba, rho = 0.51) and lower Aa, rho = 0.68) anterior vaginal wall POP-Q sites. In women without prior surgery (n = 33) there was only modest correlation between the fluoroscopic position of the bladder and the corresponding POP-Q site (Aa, rho = 0.71). In this unoperated subpopulation there was no correlation with PFF and any other POP-Q site. In women who had undergone prior hysterectomy (n = 25) or hysterectomy with anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy (n = 17), there was only a modest correlation of the most dependent portion of the bladder and the upper anterior vaginal wall site (Bb, rho = 0.67 and rho = 0.55, respectively). It was concluded that vaginal topography does not reliably predict the position of the associated viscera on PFF in women with primary or recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9609331     DOI: 10.1007/bf02765592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  4 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Evacuation proctography (defecography): an aid to the investigation of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  F M Kelvin; D D Maglinte; J T Benson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Pelvic floor evaluation with dynamic fluoroscopy.

Authors:  L Brubaker; S Retzky; C Smith; T Saclarides
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.661

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Suzan R Broekhuis; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-07

3.  Correlation between posterior vaginal wall defects assessed by clinical examination and by defecography.

Authors:  Annette G Groenendijk; Victor P van der Hulst; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-09

4.  International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Michele O'Shea; Nicola Dykes; Olga Ramm; Autumn Edenfield; Ka Lai Shek; Kim van Delft; Molly Beestrum; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Animal models of female pelvic organ prolapse: lessons learned.

Authors:  Bruna M Couri; Andrew T Lenis; Ali Borazjani; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Margot S Damaser
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-01

6.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

7.  Posterior vaginal prolapse shape and position changes at maximal Valsalva seen in 3-D MRI-based models.

Authors:  Jiajia Luo; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Assessment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: comparison of physical findings to cystodefecoperitoneography.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Annika López; Jonas Kierkegaard; Jan Zetterström; Christian Falconer; Johan Pollack; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-09-14

9.  Diagnosis of cystocele--the correlation between clinical and radiological evaluation.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Anders Mellgren; Jonas Kierkegaard; Jan Zetterström; Christian Falconer; Annika López
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-12-20

10.  Effect of anatomic urethral length on the correlation between the Q-tip test and descent at point Aa of the POP-Q system.

Authors:  J Robert Larrieux; Sunil Balgobin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.