Literature DB >> 10628459

Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography.

F M Kelvin1, D D Maglinte, D S Hale, J T Benson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared dynamic MR imaging with fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography for the detection and measurement of prolapse of pelvic organs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography with identical amounts of contrast material to opacify the bladder, vagina, and rectum. The dynamic MR imaging procedure included cine-loop presentation. Each examination was analyzed to determine the presence and extent of prolapse of pelvic organs based on specific measurements.
RESULTS: Both dynamic MR imaging and fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography revealed 10 rectoceles (mean extents, 2.85 and 2.45 cm, respectively). Nine cystoceles were revealed by both dynamic MR imaging (mean extent, 4.05 cm) and fluoroscopy (mean extent, 4.55 cm). Seven enteroceles were revealed, one of which was initially not seen on dynamic MR imaging. Two sigmoidoceles were revealed, one of which was not seen on fluoroscopy. The mean extent of the enteroceles and sigmoidoceles on dynamic MR imaging was 3.50 cm, and the mean extent on fluoroscopy was 4.25 cm. Nine of the 10 patients were able to defecate in the supine position on the MR imaging table. Patients were divided equally in their preference for dynamic MR imaging or fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography.
CONCLUSION: Triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctograpy show similar detection rates for prolapse of pelvic organs. Although dynamic MR imaging underestimates the extent of cystoceles and enteroceles, it has the advantage of revealing all pelvic organs and the pelvic floor musculature in a multiplanar cine-loop presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10628459     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  42 in total

1.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Vaginal repair of large cystoceles.

Authors:  K C Kobashi; G E Leach
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  MRI of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Pelvic floor imaging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and conventional defecography in studying outlet obstruction syndrome.

Authors:  P V Foti; R Farina; G Riva; M Coronella; E Fisichella; S Palmucci; A Racalbuto; G Politi; G C Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Aimee Summers; Hero K Hussain; Kenneth E Guire; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: comparing pubococcygeal and midpubic lines with clinical staging.

Authors:  Courtney A Woodfield; Brittany Star Hampton; Vivian Sung; Jeffrey M Brody
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-25

Review 7.  Role of conventional radiology and MRi defecography of pelvic floor hernias.

Authors:  Alfonso Reginelli; Graziella Di Grezia; Gianluca Gatta; Francesca Iacobellis; Claudia Rossi; Melchiore Giganti; Francesco Coppolino; Luca Brunese
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Reproducibility of dynamic MR imaging pelvic measurements: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Mark E Lockhart; Julia R Fielding; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Caryl G Salomon; Wen Ye; Christiane M Hakim; Clifford Y Wai; Alan H Stolpen; Anne M Weber
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The value of pre-operative multicompartment pelvic floor ultrasonography: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  F Lone; A H Sultan; A Stankiewicz; R Thakar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A protocol for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor.

Authors:  Kesara Ratnatunga; Kemal Deen; Ravikant Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.