Literature DB >> 25808134

Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations.

Pavel V Klimovich1, Michael R Shirts, David L Mobley.   

Abstract

Free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations show considerable promise for applications ranging from drug discovery to prediction of physical properties and structure-function studies. But these calculations are still difficult and tedious to analyze, and best practices for analysis are not well defined or propagated. Essentially, each group analyzing these calculations needs to decide how to conduct the analysis and, usually, develop its own analysis tools. Here, we review and recommend best practices for analysis yielding reliable free energies from molecular simulations. Additionally, we provide a Python tool, alchemical-analysis.py, freely available on GitHub as part of the pymbar package (located at http://github.com/choderalab/pymbar), that implements the analysis practices reviewed here for several reference simulation packages, which can be adapted to handle data from other packages. Both this review and the tool covers analysis of alchemical calculations generally, including free energy estimates via both thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation-based estimators. Our Python tool also handles output from multiple types of free energy calculations, including expanded ensemble and Hamiltonian replica exchange, as well as standard fixed ensemble calculations. We also survey a range of statistical and graphical ways of assessing the quality of the data and free energy estimates, and provide prototypes of these in our tool. We hope this tool and discussion will serve as a foundation for more standardization of and agreement on best practices for analysis of free energy calculations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808134      PMCID: PMC4420631          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  25 in total

1.  Linear-scaling soft-core scheme for alchemical free energy calculations.

Authors:  Floris P Buelens; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Good practices in free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrew Pohorille; Christopher Jarzynski; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  New Soft-Core Potential Function for Molecular Dynamics Based Alchemical Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Joshua Williams; Yujie Wu; Wolfgang Damm; John Shelley; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  A Benchmark Test Set for Alchemical Free Energy Transformations and Its Use to Quantify Error in Common Free Energy Methods.

Authors:  Himanshu Paliwal; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  In search of the hair-cell gating spring elastic properties of ankyrin and cadherin repeats.

Authors:  Marcos Sotomayor; David P Corey; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Nonlinear scaling schemes for Lennard-Jones interactions in free energy calculations.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; David L Mobley; David A Case
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Comparison of thermodynamic integration and Bennett acceptance ratio for calculating relative protein-ligand binding free energies.

Authors:  Anita de Ruiter; Stefan Boresch; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit.

Authors:  Sander Pronk; Szilárd Páll; Roland Schulz; Per Larsson; Pär Bjelkmar; Rossen Apostolov; Michael R Shirts; Jeremy C Smith; Peter M Kasson; David van der Spoel; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  93 in total

1.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 2.  Integration of structural dynamics and molecular evolution via protein interaction networks: a new era in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Avishek Kumar; Brandon M Butler; Sudhir Kumar; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Toward Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction with pmemdGTI: An Efficient Implementation of GPU-Accelerated Thermodynamic Integration.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Zhuyan Guo; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Accelerated Computation of Free Energy Profile at Ab Initio Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Accuracy via a Semiempirical Reference Potential. 4. Adaptive QM/MM.

Authors:  Jia-Ning Wang; Wei Liu; Pengfei Li; Yan Mo; Wenxin Hu; Jun Zheng; Xiaoliang Pan; Yihan Shao; Ye Mei
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Molecular simulations and free-energy calculations suggest conformation-dependent anion binding to a cytoplasmic site as a mechanism for Na+/K+-ATPase ion selectivity.

Authors:  Asghar M Razavi; Lucie Delemotte; Joshua R Berlin; Vincenzo Carnevale; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Combining MOSCED with molecular simulation free energy calculations or electronic structure calculations to develop an efficient tool for solvent formulation and selection.

Authors:  Courtney E Cox; Jeremy R Phifer; Larissa Ferreira da Silva; Gabriel Gonçalves Nogueira; Ryan T Ley; Elizabeth J O'Loughlin; Ana Karolyne Pereira Barbosa; Brett T Rygelski; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Fast Solver for Large Scale Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio Equations.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; David S Cerutti; Dan Mermelstein; Charles Lin; Scott LeGrand; Timothy J Giese; Adrian Roitberg; David A Case; Ross C Walker; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  In silico design of peptides as potential ligands to resistin.

Authors:  L América Chi; M Cristina Vargas
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.