Mary E Tinetti1,2, Darcé M Costello1, Aanand D Naik3,4, Claire Davenport5, Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos1, Julia R Van Liew6, Jessica Esterson1, Eliza Kiwak1, Lilian Dindo3,4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN 13-413), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Houston Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 5. Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 6. Department of Behavioral Medicine, Medical Humanities, and Bioethics, Des Moines University, Des Moines, Iowa.
Abstract
Importance: Older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) vary in their health outcome goals and the health care that they prefer to receive to achieve these goals. Objective: To describe the outcome goals and health care preferences of this population with MCCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included participants in the Patient Priorities Care study who underwent health priorities identification from February 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018, in a primary care practice. Patients eligible to participate were 65 years or older, English speaking, and had at least 3 chronic conditions; in addition, they used at least 10 medications, saw at least 2 specialists, or had at least 2 emergency department visits or 1 hospitalization during the past year. Of 236 eligible patients, 163 (69%) agreed to participate in this study. Data were analyzed from August 1 to October 31, 2020. Exposures: Guided by facilitators, participants identified their core values, as many as 3 actionable and realistic outcome goals, health-related barriers to these goals, and as many as 3 helpful and 3 bothersome health care activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies were ascertained for outcome goals and health care preferences. Preferences included health care activities (medications, health care visits, procedures, diagnostic tests, and self-management) reported as either helpful or bothersome. Results: Most of the 163 participants were White (158 [96.9%]) and women (109 [66.9%]), with a mean (SD) age of 77.6 (7.6) years. Of 459 goals, the most common encompassed meals and other activities with family and friends (111 [24.2%]), shopping (28 [6.1%]), and exercising (21 [4.6%]). Twenty individuals (12.3%) desired to live independently without specifying necessary activities. Of 312 barriers identified, the most common were pain (128 [41.0%]), fatigue (45 [14.4%]), unsteadiness (42 [13.5%]), and dyspnea (19 [6.1%]). Similar proportions of patients identified at least 1 medication that was helpful (130 [79.8%]) or bothersome (128 [78.5%]). Medications most commonly cited as helpful were pain medications, including nonopiods (36 of 55 users [65.5%]) and opioids (15 of 27 users [55.6%]); sleep medications (27 of 51 users [52.9%]); and respiratory inhalants (19 of 45 [42.2%]). Most often mentioned as bothersome were statins (25 of 97 users [25.8%]) and antidepressants (13 of 40 users [32.5%]). Thirty-two participants (19.6%) reported using too many medications. Health care visits were identified as helpful by 43 participants (26.4%); 15 (9.2%) reported too many visits. Procedures were named helpful by 38 participants (23.3%); 24 (14.7%) cited unwanted procedures. Among 48 participants with diabetes, monitoring of glucose levels was doable for 18 (37.5%) and too bothersome for 9 (18.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Participants identified realistic and actionable goals while varying in health care activities deemed helpful or bothersome. The goals and health care preferences of more diverse populations must be explored. Previous work suggests that clinicians can use this information in decision-making.
Importance: Older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) vary in their health outcome goals and the health care that they prefer to receive to achieve these goals. Objective: To describe the outcome goals and health care preferences of this population with MCCs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included participants in the Patient Priorities Care study who underwent health priorities identification from February 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018, in a primary care practice. Patients eligible to participate were 65 years or older, English speaking, and had at least 3 chronic conditions; in addition, they used at least 10 medications, saw at least 2 specialists, or had at least 2 emergency department visits or 1 hospitalization during the past year. Of 236 eligible patients, 163 (69%) agreed to participate in this study. Data were analyzed from August 1 to October 31, 2020. Exposures: Guided by facilitators, participants identified their core values, as many as 3 actionable and realistic outcome goals, health-related barriers to these goals, and as many as 3 helpful and 3 bothersome health care activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies were ascertained for outcome goals and health care preferences. Preferences included health care activities (medications, health care visits, procedures, diagnostic tests, and self-management) reported as either helpful or bothersome. Results: Most of the 163 participants were White (158 [96.9%]) and women (109 [66.9%]), with a mean (SD) age of 77.6 (7.6) years. Of 459 goals, the most common encompassed meals and other activities with family and friends (111 [24.2%]), shopping (28 [6.1%]), and exercising (21 [4.6%]). Twenty individuals (12.3%) desired to live independently without specifying necessary activities. Of 312 barriers identified, the most common were pain (128 [41.0%]), fatigue (45 [14.4%]), unsteadiness (42 [13.5%]), and dyspnea (19 [6.1%]). Similar proportions of patients identified at least 1 medication that was helpful (130 [79.8%]) or bothersome (128 [78.5%]). Medications most commonly cited as helpful were pain medications, including nonopiods (36 of 55 users [65.5%]) and opioids (15 of 27 users [55.6%]); sleep medications (27 of 51 users [52.9%]); and respiratory inhalants (19 of 45 [42.2%]). Most often mentioned as bothersome were statins (25 of 97 users [25.8%]) and antidepressants (13 of 40 users [32.5%]). Thirty-two participants (19.6%) reported using too many medications. Health care visits were identified as helpful by 43 participants (26.4%); 15 (9.2%) reported too many visits. Procedures were named helpful by 38 participants (23.3%); 24 (14.7%) cited unwanted procedures. Among 48 participants with diabetes, monitoring of glucose levels was doable for 18 (37.5%) and too bothersome for 9 (18.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Participants identified realistic and actionable goals while varying in health care activities deemed helpful or bothersome. The goals and health care preferences of more diverse populations must be explored. Previous work suggests that clinicians can use this information in decision-making.
Authors: Donna M Zulman; Jeremy B Sussman; Xisui Chen; Christine T Cigolle; Caroline S Blaum; Rodney A Hayward Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cynthia M Boyd; Jennifer L Wolff; Erin Giovannetti; Lisa Reider; Carlos Weiss; Qian-li Xue; Bruce Leff; Chad Boult; Travonia Hughes; Cynthia Rand Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mary E Tinetti; Jessica Esterson; Rosie Ferris; Philip Posner; Caroline S Blaum Journal: Clin Geriatr Med Date: 2016-02-28 Impact factor: 3.076
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; Denise E Bonds; Cynthia M Boyd; Melinda M Davis; Bruce Finke; Michael H Fox; Russell E Glasgow; Richard A Goodman; Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts; Sue Lachenmayr; Cristin Lind; Elizabeth A Madigan; David S Meyers; Suzanne Mintz; Wendy J Nilsen; Sally Okun; Sarah Ruiz; Marcel E Salive; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Cynthia Boyd; Cynthia Daisy Smith; Frederick A Masoudi; Caroline S Blaum; John A Dodson; Ariel R Green; Amy Kelley; Daniel Matlock; Jennifer Ouellet; Michael W Rich; Nancy L Schoenborn; Mary E Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-03-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Viet-Thi Tran; Magdalena Harrington; Victor M Montori; Caroline Barnes; Paul Wicks; Philippe Ravaud Journal: BMC Med Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Boris Draznin; Vanita R Aroda; George Bakris; Gretchen Benson; Florence M Brown; RaShaye Freeman; Jennifer Green; Elbert Huang; Diana Isaacs; Scott Kahan; Jose Leon; Sarah K Lyons; Anne L Peters; Priya Prahalad; Jane E B Reusch; Deborah Young-Hyman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Andrea M Kurasz; Glenn E Smith; Rosie E Curiel; Warren W Barker; Raquel C Behar; Alexandra Ramirez; Melissa J Armstrong Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2021-08-28
Authors: Andrea N Jensen; Ove Andersen; Hejdi Gamst-Jensen; Maria Kristiansen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: LeChauncy Woodard; Amber B Amspoker; Natalie E Hundt; Howard S Gordon; Brian Hertz; Edward Odom; Anne Utech; Javad Razjouyan; Suja S Rajan; Nipa Kamdar; Jasmin Lindo; Lea Kiefer; Praveen Mehta; Aanand D Naik Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Arjun K Venkatesh; Hollie Dowd; Ula Hwang; Rockman F Ferrigno; Eleanor A Reid; Mary E Tinetti Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Lori Frank; Lee A Jennings; Ronald C Petersen; Tabassum Majid; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Lonni Schicker; Jason Karlawish Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 7.538