BACKGROUND: Applying disease-specific guidelines to people with multimorbidity may result in complex regimens that impose treatment burden. OBJECTIVES: To describe and validate a measure of healthcare task difficulty (HCTD) in a sample of older adults with multimorbidity. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal secondary data analysis. SUBJECTS: Multimorbid adults aged 65 years or older from primary care clinics. MEASURES: We generated a scale (0-16) of self-reported difficulty with 8 HCTD and conducted factor analysis to assess its dimensionality and internal consistency. To assess predictive ability, cross-sectional associations of HCTD and number of chronic diseases, and conditions that add to health status complexity (falls, visual, and hearing impairment), patient activation, patient-reported quality of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care), mental and physical health (SF-36) were tested using statistical tests for trend (n=904). Longitudinal analyses of the effects of change in HCTD on changes in the outcomes were conducted among a subset (n=370) with ≥1 follow-up at 6 and/or 18 months. All models were adjusted for age, education, sex, race, and time. RESULTS: Greater HCTD was associated with worse mental and physical health [Cuzick test for trend (P<0.05)], and patient-reported quality of chronic illness care (P<0.05). In longitudinal analysis, increasing patient activation was associated with declining HCTD over time (P<0.01). Increasing HCTD over time was associated with declining mental (P<0.001) and physical health (P=0.001) and patient-reported quality of chronic illness care (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study establish the construct validity of the HCTD scale.
BACKGROUND: Applying disease-specific guidelines to people with multimorbidity may result in complex regimens that impose treatment burden. OBJECTIVES: To describe and validate a measure of healthcare task difficulty (HCTD) in a sample of older adults with multimorbidity. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal secondary data analysis. SUBJECTS: Multimorbid adults aged 65 years or older from primary care clinics. MEASURES: We generated a scale (0-16) of self-reported difficulty with 8 HCTD and conducted factor analysis to assess its dimensionality and internal consistency. To assess predictive ability, cross-sectional associations of HCTD and number of chronic diseases, and conditions that add to health status complexity (falls, visual, and hearing impairment), patient activation, patient-reported quality of chronic illness care (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care), mental and physical health (SF-36) were tested using statistical tests for trend (n=904). Longitudinal analyses of the effects of change in HCTD on changes in the outcomes were conducted among a subset (n=370) with ≥1 follow-up at 6 and/or 18 months. All models were adjusted for age, education, sex, race, and time. RESULTS: Greater HCTD was associated with worse mental and physical health [Cuzick test for trend (P<0.05)], and patient-reported quality of chronic illness care (P<0.05). In longitudinal analysis, increasing patient activation was associated with declining HCTD over time (P<0.01). Increasing HCTD over time was associated with declining mental (P<0.001) and physical health (P=0.001) and patient-reported quality of chronic illness care (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study establish the construct validity of the HCTD scale.
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-04-26
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Edward H Wagner; Judith Schaefer; Lisa D Mahoney; Robert J Reid; Sarah M Greene Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: M Danis; E Mutran; J M Garrett; S C Stearns; R T Slifkin; L Hanson; J F Williams; L R Churchill Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Eve A Kerr; Michele Heisler; Sarah L Krein; Mohammed Kabeto; Kenneth M Langa; David Weir; John D Piette Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-07-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elbert S Huang; Sydney E S Brown; Bernard G Ewigman; Edward C Foley; David O Meltzer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-07-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David T Eton; Djenane Ramalho de Oliveira; Jason S Egginton; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Laura Odell; Carl R May; Victor M Montori Journal: Patient Relat Outcome Meas Date: 2012-08-24
Authors: George Demiris; Nancy A Hodgson; Justine S Sefcik; Jasmine L Travers; Miranda Varrassee McPhillips; Mary D Naylor Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Lee A Jennings; Alina Palimaru; Maria G Corona; Xavier E Cagigas; Karina D Ramirez; Tracy Zhao; Ron D Hays; Neil S Wenger; David B Reuben Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Shelli L Feder; Eliza Kiwak; Darcé Costello; Lilian Dindo; Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos; Lauren Vo; Mary Geda; Caroline Blaum; Mary E Tinetti; Aanand D Naik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Parag Goyal; Tatiana Requijo; Birgit Siceloff; Megan J Shen; Ruth Masterson Creber; Sarah N Hilmer; Ian M Kronish; Mark S Lachs; Monika M Safford Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: David T Eton; Kathleen J Yost; Jin-Shei Lai; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Jason S Egginton; Jordan K Rosedahl; Mark Linzer; Deborah H Boehm; Azra Thakur; Sara Poplau; Laura Odell; Victor M Montori; Carl R May; Roger T Anderson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mary F Wyman; Daniel Liebzeit; Corrine I Voils; Barbara J Bowers; Elizabeth N Chapman; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Korey A Kennelty; Amy J H Kind; Julia Loosen; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Melissa Dattalo Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-02-15
Authors: Caroline S Blaum; Jonathan Rosen; Aanand D Naik; Cynthia D Smith; Lilian Dindo; Lauren Vo; Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos; Jessica Esterson; Mary Geda; Rosie Ferris; Darce Costello; Denise Acampora; Thomas Meehan; Mary E Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562