Literature DB >> 33738967

Logistic retainment interval dose exploration design for Phase I clinical trials of cytotoxic agents.

Thomas A Murray1.   

Abstract

Phase I studies of a cytotoxic agent often aim to identify the dose that provides an investigator specified target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) probability. In practice, an initial cohort receives a dose with a putative low DLT probability, and subsequent dosing follows by consecutively deciding whether to retain the current dose, escalate to the adjacent higher dose, or de-escalate to the adjacent lower dose. This article proposes a Phase I design derived using a Bayesian decision-theoretic approach to this sequential decision-making process. The design consecutively chooses the action that minimizes posterior expected loss where the loss reflects the distance on the log-odds scale between the target and the DLT probability of the dose that would be given to the next cohort under the corresponding action. A logistic model is assumed for the log odds of a DLT at the current dose with a weakly informative t-distribution prior centered at the target. The key design parameters are the pre-specified odds ratios for the DLT probabilities at the adjacent higher and lower doses. Dosing rules may be pre-tabulated, as these only depend on the outcomes at the current dose, which greatly facilitates implementation. The recommended default version of the proposed design improves dose selection relative to many established designs across a variety of scenarios.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; Phase I design; decision theory; dose finding; loss function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33738967      PMCID: PMC8575315          DOI: 10.1002/pst.2114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.234


  15 in total

1.  Determining the effective sample size of a parametric prior.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The current design of oncology phase I clinical trials: progressing from algorithms to statistical models.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03

3.  A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.

Authors:  Wentian Guo; Sue-Jane Wang; Shengjie Yang; Henry Lynn; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.

Authors:  J O'Quigley; M Pepe; L Fisher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Ping Liu; Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The rapid enrollment design for Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Yunfei Wang; Matthew C Foster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.