Literature DB >> 26833922

The rapid enrollment design for Phase I clinical trials.

Anastasia Ivanova1, Yunfei Wang2, Matthew C Foster3.   

Abstract

We propose a dose-finding design for Phase I oncology trials where each new patient is assigned to the dose most likely to be the target dose given observed data. The main model assumption is that the dose-toxicity curve is non-decreasing. This method is beneficial when it is desirable to assign a patient to a dose as soon as the patient is enrolled into a study. To prevent assignments to doses with limited toxicity information in fast accruing trials we propose a conservative rule that assigns temporary fractional toxicities to patients still in follow-up. We also recommend always using a safety rule in any fast accruing dose-finding trial.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRM; Phase I trial; RED; TITE-CRM; mTPI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26833922      PMCID: PMC4892992          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

1.  Improved up-and-down designs for phase I trials.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Aliakbar Montazer-Haghighi; Sri Gopal Mohanty; Stephen D Durham
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A phase I dose-escalation study of clofarabine in combination with fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Matthew C Foster; Chirag Amin; Peter M Voorhees; Hendrik W van Deventer; Kristy L Richards; Anastasia Ivanova; Jennifer Whitman; Wingkeung Michael Chiu; Nathan D Barr; Thomas Shea
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2012-01-31

3.  Dose finding for continuous and ordinal outcomes with a monotone objective function: a unified approach.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Se Hee Kim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Yunfei Wang; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Sue-Jane Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; Yu Shen; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Escalation with overdose control using time to toxicity for cancer phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Mourad Tighiouart; Yuan Liu; André Rogatko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Bayesian model-free approach to combination therapy phase I trials using censored time-to-toxicity data.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 1.864

2.  Dose-finding designs for trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies.

Authors:  Cody Chiuzan; Jonathan Shtaynberger; Gulam A Manji; Jimmy K Duong; Gary K Schwartz; Anastasia Ivanova; Shing M Lee
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Rapid enrollment design for finding the optimal dose in immunotherapy trials with ordered groups.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Xue; Matthew C Foster; Anastasia Ivanova
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Logistic retainment interval dose exploration design for Phase I clinical trials of cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 1.234

5.  Phase Ib trial of lenalidomide as post-remission therapy for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: Safety and longitudinal assessment of geriatric functional domains.

Authors:  Justin D Woods; Joshua F Zeidner; Hendrik W Van Deventer; Katarzyna Jamieson; Melissa Matson; Jack Zhang; William Pulley; Tucker Brenizer; Hyman Muss; Kirsten A Nyrop; Sanah N Vohra; Allison M Deal; Anastasia Ivanova; Matthew C Foster
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Practicalities in running early-phase trials using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) for interventions with long toxicity periods using two radiotherapy oncology trials as examples.

Authors:  Erik van Werkhoven; Samantha Hinsley; Eleni Frangou; Jane Holmes; Rosemarie de Haan; Maria Hawkins; Sarah Brown; Sharon B Love
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.