Literature DB >> 33731843

Practical aspects of the application of helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation.

Joongyo Lee1, Euidam Kim2, Nalee Kim3, Hwa Kyung Byun1, Chang-Ok Suh1,4, Yoonsun Chung5, Hong In Yoon6.   

Abstract

We investigated the practical aspects of the application of craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy (HT-CSI) by evaluating interfractional setup errors and intrafractional movement during each treatment in 83 patients undergoing HT-CSI between January 2014 and December 2018. Interfractional setup errors in each axis (mediolateral; ML, craniocaudal; CC, and anteroposterior; AP) were assessed as differences between pre-treatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) images scanned (zygomatic arch to the C4 spine) and planning CT images. Intrafractional movements were evaluated as the difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment MVCT (T12-L4 spine) images at each fraction. Median interfractional setup error was acceptable in every axis (ML: 1.6 mm, CC: 1.9 mm, AP: 3.1 mm). Seven patients (8.4%) experienced significant intrafractional displacement from 1 to 10 fractions (0.34% for ML, 0.74% for CC, 1.21% for AP). Weight loss grade 1+ during treatment (p = 0.016) was an independent risk factor for significant intrafractional displacement. The risk factor for significant intrafractional movement in pediatric patients was weight loss grade 1+ (p = 0.020), while there was no factor in adults. HT-CSI could be a feasible treatment modality with acceptable setup verification. Inter- and intrafractional errors were acceptable; paying attention to weight loss during treatment is necessary, especially in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731843      PMCID: PMC7969733          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85574-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  35 in total

1.  Feasibility of cranio-spinal axis radiation with the Hi-Art tomotherapy system.

Authors:  José A Peñagarícano; Nikos Papanikolaou; Yulong Yan; Emad Youssef; Vaneerat Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Set-up errors analyses in IMRT treatments for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to evaluate time trends, PTV and PRV margins.

Authors:  Valeria Mongioj; Ester Orlandi; Mauro Palazzi; Elena Deponti; Franceschini Marzia; Claudio Stucchi; Claudia Sangalli; Carlo Fallai; Giancarlo Zonca; Patrizia Olmi; Emanuele Pignoli
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Daily setup uncertainty analysis for craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Rolina Al-Wassia; Houda Bahig; Emily Poon; William Parker; Carolyn Freeman
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-09-10

4.  Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors using megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) during image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) on helical tomotherapy (HT).

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Maheshkumar Upasani; Zubin Master; Anita Patil; Reena Phurailatpam; Siji Nojin; Sadhana Kannan; Jayant Godasastri; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-11

5.  Renal function after unilateral nephrectomy for Wilms' tumour: the influence of radiation therapy.

Authors:  S S de Graaf; H van Gent; W C Reitsma-Bierens; W H van Luyk; W V Dolsma; A Postma
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Craniospinal irradiation with spinal IMRT to improve target homogeneity.

Authors:  Atmaram Pai Panandiker; Holly Ning; Anna Likhacheva; Karen Ullman; Barbara Arora; John Ondos; Shervin Karimpour; Roger Packer; Robert Miller; Deborah Citrin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma.

Authors:  W H St Clair; J A Adams; M Bues; B C Fullerton; Sean La Shell; H M Kooy; J S Loeffler; N J Tarbell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Helical tomotherapy. Experiences of the first 150 patients in Heidelberg.

Authors:  Florian Sterzing; Kai Schubert; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Jörn Kalz; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Pediatric craniospinal axis irradiation with helical tomotherapy: patient outcome and lack of acute pulmonary toxicity.

Authors:  José Peñagarícano; Eduardo Moros; Peter Corry; Robert Saylors; Vaneerat Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Clinical Implementation of Robust Optimization for Craniospinal Irradiation.

Authors:  Alexandria Tasson; Nadia N Laack; Chris Beltran
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  2 in total

1.  Radiotherapy for head and neck tumours using an oral fixation and parameter acquisition device and TOMO technology: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaofang Zhang; Tianlu Wang; Xinyan Xiao; Xia Li; Chen Yu Wang; Bo Huang; Lei He; Yingqiu Song
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Pulmonary toxicity of craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Joongyo Lee; Euidam Kim; Nalee Kim; Chang-Ok Suh; Yoonsun Chung; Hong In Yoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.