Literature DB >> 20735283

Set-up errors analyses in IMRT treatments for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to evaluate time trends, PTV and PRV margins.

Valeria Mongioj1, Ester Orlandi, Mauro Palazzi, Elena Deponti, Franceschini Marzia, Claudio Stucchi, Claudia Sangalli, Carlo Fallai, Giancarlo Zonca, Patrizia Olmi, Emanuele Pignoli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: the aims of this study were to analyze the systematic and random interfractional set-up errors during Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in 20 consecutive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients by means of Electronic Portal Images Device (EPID), to define appropriate Planning Target Volume (PTV) and Planning Risk Volume (PRV) margins, as well as to investigate set-up displacement trend as a function of time during fractionated RT course.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: before EPID clinical implementation, an anthropomorphic phantom was shifted intentionally 5 mm to all directions and the EPIs were compared with the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) to test the system's capability to recognize displacements observed in clinical studies. Then, 578 clinical images were analyzed with a mean of 29 images for each patient.
RESULTS: phantom data showed that the system was able to correct shifts with an accuracy of 1 mm. As regards clinical data, the estimated population systematic errors were 1.3 mm for left-right (L-R), 1 mm for superior-inferior (S-I) and 1.1 mm for anterior-posterior (A-P) directions, respectively. Population random errors were 1.3 mm, 1.5 mm and 1.3 mm for L-R, S-I and A-P directions, respectively. PTV margin was at least 3.4, 3 and 3.2 mm for L-R, S-I and A-P direction, respectively. PRV margins for brainstem and spinal cord were 2.3, 2 and 2.1 mm and 3.8, 3.5 and 3.2 mm for L-R, A-P and S-I directions, respectively. Set-up error displacements showed no significant changes as the therapy progressed (p>0.05), although displacements >3 mm were found more frequently when severe weight loss or tumor nodal shrinkage occurred. DISCUSSION: these results enable us to choose margins that guarantee with sufficient accuracy the coverage of PTVs and organs at risk sparing. Collected data confirmed the need for a strict check of patient position reproducibility in case of anatomical changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20735283     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.509108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  13 in total

1.  Variable planning margin approach to account for locoregional variations in setup uncertainties.

Authors:  Jinzhong Yang; Adam S Garden; Yongbin Zhang; Lifei Zhang; Lei Dong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Are pitch and roll compensations required in all pathologies? A data analysis of 2945 fractions.

Authors:  Pietro Mancosu; Giacomo Reggiori; Anna Gaudino; Francesca Lobefalo; Lucia Paganini; Valentina Palumbo; Antonella Stravato; Stefano Tomatis; Marta Scorsetti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of inter-fraction and intra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Wen-Jing Yin; Ying Sun; Feng Chi; Jian-Lan Fang; Rui Guo; Xiao-Li Yu; Yan-Ping Mao; Zhen-Yu Qi; Ying Guo; Meng-Zhong Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Different setup errors assessed by weekly cone-beam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jiqing Su; Wen Chen; Huiyun Yang; Jidong Hong; Zijian Zhang; Guangzheng Yang; Li Li; Rui Wei
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Impact of body-mass factors on setup displacement in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy using daily on-line image guidance.

Authors:  Yo-Liang Lai; Shih-Neng Yang; Ji-An Liang; Yao-Ching Wang; Chun-Yen Yu; Ching-Hsiung Su; Shang-Wen Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  The ratio of weight loss to planning target volume significantly impacts setup errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing helical tomotherapy with daily megavoltage computed tomography.

Authors:  Wei-Hsien Hou; Chun-Wei Wang; Chiao-Ling Tsai; Feng-Ming Hsu; Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Optimization of the margin expanded from the clinical to the planned target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wang Fangzheng; Jiang Chuner; Sun Quanquan; Ye Zhimin; Yang Shuangyan; Yu Huanhuan; Shi Jianfang; Masoto Sakamoto; Qin Weifeng; Fu Zhenfu; Jiang Yangming; Wang Yuezhen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-20

8.  Study of Spinal Cord Substructure Expansion Margin in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Dingjie Li; Shengtao Wei; Tian Li; Yang Liu; Jing Cai; Hong Ge
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

9.  Efficacy of Concurrent Chemotherapy for Intermediate Risk NPC in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era: a Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Yuan Zhang; Wen-Fei Li; Xu Liu; Rui Guo; Ying Sun; Ai-Hua Lin; Lei Chen; Jun Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Analysis of setup error based on CTVision for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during IGRT.

Authors:  Shuxu Zhang; Xiang Zhou; Quanbin Zhang; Shaohui Jiang; Ruihao Wang; Guoqian Zhang; Huaiyu Lei; Shengqu Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.