Literature DB >> 24674409

Daily setup uncertainty analysis for craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Rolina Al-Wassia1, Houda Bahig2, Emily Poon3, William Parker4, Carolyn Freeman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Setup deviations of a craniospinal irradiation (CSI) patient cohort previously treated with helical tomotherapy were used to derive the optimal planning target volume (PTV) margin for CSI patients treated in the supine position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The daily setup shifts of 27 CSI tomotherapy patients as determined using pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography verification for a total of 454 fractions were evaluated. Translational displacements in the mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal (CC), and anteroposterior (AP) directions were used to assess the systematic and random setup errors, and to derive the PTV margin required when daily image guidance is unavailable.
RESULTS: The individual patient mean shifts and the corresponding standard deviations in the ML, CC, and AP directions were -0.5 ± 2.1 mm, 1.0 ± 2.7 mm, and 0.7 ± 1.1 mm, respectively. The random errors in the corresponding directions were 1.9 mm, 1.9 mm, and 2.2 mm. The PTV margins required in the absence of daily imaging were 3.7 mm to the right, 4.7 mm to the left, 4.4 mm inferior, 6.4 mm superior, 1.6 mm posterior, and 3.0 mm anterior.
CONCLUSIONS: The current PTV margin of 3.0 mm is sufficient to ensure clinical target volume coverage for CSI tomotherapy patients treated with daily megavoltage computed tomography imaging. When pretreatment verification imaging is not used to lower the setup uncertainty, a larger PTV margin of up to 6.4 mm in the CC direction will be needed.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24674409     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  6 in total

1.  The effects of rotational setup errors in total body irradiation using helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Akira Isobe; Keisuke Usui; Naoya Hara; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  The heterogeneous CTV-PTV margins should be given for different parts of tumors during tomotherapy.

Authors:  Ying Tong; Guanzhong Gong; Jinhu Chen; Jie Lu; Tonghai Liu; Pinjing Cheng; Yong Yin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-06

3.  Residual positioning errors and uncertainties for pediatric craniospinal irradiation and the impact of image guidance.

Authors:  Daniel Gram; André Haraldsson; N Patrik Brodin; Karsten Nysom; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Practical aspects of the application of helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Joongyo Lee; Euidam Kim; Nalee Kim; Hwa Kyung Byun; Chang-Ok Suh; Yoonsun Chung; Hong In Yoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Setup Accuracy in Craniospinal Irradiation: Implications for Planning Treatment Volume Margins.

Authors:  Jennifer Novak; Dongsu Du; Ashwin Shinde; Richard Li; Arya Amini; Yi-Jen Chen; Jeffrey Wong; Chunhui Han; John Neylon; An Liu; Scott Glaser
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-04

6.  Effects of megavoltage computed tomographic scan methodology on setup verification and adaptive dose calculation in helical TomoTherapy.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Tong Bai; Jiabing Gu; Ziwen Sun; Yumei Wei; Baosheng Li; Yong Yin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.