Literature DB >> 33731137

Assessment of spino cranial angle of cervical spine sagittal balance system after multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Zheng Wang1, Zhi-Wei Wang1, Xi-Wen Fan1, Xian-Da Gao1, Wen-Yuan Ding1, Da-Long Yang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the impact of spino cranial angle (SCA) on alteration of cervical alignment after multi-level anterior cervical discectomy fusion (ACDF) and explore the relationship between SCA and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 49 patients following multi-level ACDF for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) with more than 2 years follow-up period were enrolled. Radiographic data including SCA were measured. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was applied to confirm the optimal cut-off values of SCA for predicting sagittal balance. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the cut-off value of preoperative SCA. Correlation coefficients were analyzed between SCA and HRQOL scores.
RESULTS: Optimal cut-off values for predicting sagittal balance was SCA of 88.6°. Patients with higher SCA, no matter preoperatively, postoperatively and at follow-up, got lower T1-Slope (T1s), C2-C7 lordosis angle (CA) and higher △SCA (pre vs post: p = 0.036, pre vs F/U: p = 0.022). Simultaneously, pre-SCA, post-SCA, and F/U-SCA in the high SCA group were positively correlated with the pre-NDI, post-NDI, and F/U-NDI scores respectively (pre: p < 0.001, post: p = 0.015, F/U: p = 0.003). However, no correlation was performed in the low SCA group.
CONCLUSION: An excessive SCA can be considered to cause poorer clinical outcomes at preoperative and better correction after surgery. The SCA could be used as a new reference value to determine sagittal balance parameters of the cervical spine and to assess the quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Health-related quality of life scores; Multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Sagittal balance; Spino cranial angle

Year:  2021        PMID: 33731137      PMCID: PMC7968356          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02353-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  25 in total

1.  Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Justin S Smith; Robert Eastlack; Donald J Blaskiewicz; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Shay Bess; Han Jo Kim; Gregory M Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Munish Gupta; Michael O'Brien; Richard Hostin; Justin K Scheer; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Kai-Ming G Fu; Robert Hart; Todd J Albert; K Daniel Riew; Michael G Fehlings; Vedat Deviren; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-08-14

2.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  ACDF with the PCB cage-plate system versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Hui-Lin Yang; Yao-Zeng Xu; Rong-Fu Qi; Hua-Qing Guan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-06

4.  The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Authors:  Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Authors:  Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Comparison of Three Reconstructive Techniques in the Surgical Management of Patients With Four-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Huadong Wang; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Li Li; Shuxun Hou; Hailong Zhang; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.

Authors:  Yung Park; Takeshi Maeda; Woojin Cho; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effects on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Richard D Ferch; Amjad Shad; Tom A D Cadoux-Hudson; Peter J Teddy
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Analysis of sagittal alignment parameters following anterior cervical hybrid decompression and fusion of multilevel cervical Spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yuming Huang; Zhibin Lan; Weihong Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Exploration on sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after consecutive three-level hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a minimum of a 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Yan Liang; Guanjie Yu; Zhenqi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Haiying Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

1.  Retrospective Analysis of Sagittal Balance Parameters and Clinical Efficacy After Short-Segment Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery with Different Fusion Devices.

Authors:  Zihan Wei; Ying Zhang; Sizhen Yang; Chenhui Cai; Jiawen Ye; Hao Qiu; Xu Hu; Yiyun Qu; Xuan Wen; Tongwei Chu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.