Literature DB >> 25692364

The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Jessica A Tang1, Justin K Scheer, Justin S Smith, Vedat Deviren, Shay Bess, Robert A Hart, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Frank Schwab, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive spinal regional and global sagittal malalignment has been repeatedly shown to correlate with pain and disability in thoracolumbar fusion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between regional cervical sagittal alignment and postoperative outcomes for patients receiving multilevel cervical posterior fusion.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2010, 113 patients received multilevel posterior cervical fusion for cervical stenosis, myelopathy, and kyphosis. Radiographic measurements made at intermediate follow-up included the following: (1) C1-C2 lordosis, (2) C2-C7 lordosis, (3) C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA; distance between C2 plumb line and C7), (4) center of gravity of head SVA (CGH-C7 SVA), and (5) C1-C7 SVA. Health-related quality-of-life measures included neck disability index (NDI), visual analog pain scale, and SF-36 physical component scores. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated between pairs of radiographic measures and health-related quality-of-life scores.
RESULTS: Both C2-C7 SVA and CGH-C7 SVA negatively correlated with SF-36 physical component scores (r =-0.43, P< .001 and r =-0.36, P = .005, respectively). C2-C7 SVA positively correlated with NDI scores (r = 0.20, P = .036). C2-C7 SVA positively correlated with C1-C2 lordosis (r = 0.33, P = .001). For significant correlations between C2-C7 SVA and NDI scores, regression models predicted a threshold C2-C7 SVA value of approximately 40 mm, beyond which correlations were most significant.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that, similar to the thoracolumbar spine, the severity of disability increases with positive sagittal malalignment following surgical reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25692364     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000462074.66077.2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  60 in total

1.  Factors associated with postoperative axial symptom after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective study using multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Xiuru Zhang; Yanzheng Gao; Kun Gao; Zhenghong Yu; Dongbo Lv; Hao Ma; Gongwei Zhai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  K-line tilt as a novel radiographic parameter in cervical sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Kim; Tae Hwan Kim; Moon Soo Park; Seok Woo Kim; Ho Geun Chang; Ji Hee Kim; Jun Hyong Ahn; In Bok Chang; Joon Ho Song; Jae Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Prospective multi-centric evaluation of upper cervical and infra-cervical sagittal compensatory alignment in patients with adult cervical deformity.

Authors:  Subaraman Ramchandran; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Daniel Sciubba; Justin K Scheer; Cyrus M Jalai; Alan Daniels; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Gregory Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Robert A Hart; Justin S Smith; Christopher Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yang; Ronald H M A Bartels; Roland Donk; Mark P Arts; Caroline M W Goedmakers; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does sitting versus standing radiographic assessment of odontoid fractures matter? A case report.

Authors:  Ilyas S Aleem; Yazeed Gussous; Michael King; Jeremy Fogelson; Ahmad Nassr; Bradford L Currier
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

6.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion can restore cervical sagittal alignment in degenerative cervical disease.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Byung-Wan Choi; JeaSeok Park; Sebastien Pesenti; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 7.  Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Authors:  Fong Poh Ling; T Chevillotte; A Leglise; W Thompson; C Bouthors; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Importance of the preoperative cross-sectional area of the semispinalis cervicis as a risk factor for loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Byung-Jou Lee; Jin Hoon Park; Sang-Ryong Jeon; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  Jong Tae Kim; Ho Jin Lee; Doo Yong Choi; Myoung Hoon Shin; Jae Taek Hong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Correlation analysis between C 7 slope and cervical sagittal parameters in short segment anterior cervical discectomy with fusion].

Authors:  Junfeng Ma; Zhaojun Cheng; Zehua Jiang; Jianjun Yuan; Wei Wang; Mingxing Long; Xueli Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.