Literature DB >> 22653395

The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.

Jessica A Tang1, Justin K Scheer, Justin S Smith, Vedat Deviren, Shay Bess, Robert A Hart, Virginie Lafage, Christopher I Shaffrey, Frank Schwab, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positive spinal regional and global sagittal malalignment has been repeatedly shown to correlate with pain and disability in thoracolumbar fusion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between regional cervical sagittal alignment and postoperative outcomes for patients receiving multilevel cervical posterior fusion.
METHODS: From 2006 to 2010, 113 patients received multilevel posterior cervical fusion for cervical stenosis, myelopathy, and kyphosis. Radiographic measurements made at intermediate follow-up included the following: (1) C1-C2 lordosis, (2) C2-C7 lordosis, (3) C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA; distance between C2 plumb line and C7), (4) center of gravity of head SVA (CGH-C7 SVA), and (5) C1-C7 SVA. Health-related quality-of-life measures included neck disability index (NDI), visual analog pain scale, and SF-36 physical component scores. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were calculated between pairs of radiographic measures and health-related quality-of-life scores.
RESULTS: Both C2-C7 SVA and CGH-C7 SVA negatively correlated with SF-36 physical component scores (r = -0.43, P < .001 and r = -0.36, P = .005, respectively). C2-C7 SVA positively correlated with NDI scores (r = 0.20, P = .036). C2-C7 SVA positively correlated with C1-C2 lordosis (r = 0.33, P = .001). For significant correlations between C2-C7 SVA and NDI scores, regression models predicted a threshold C2-C7 SVA value of approximately 40 mm, beyond which correlations were most significant.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that, similar to the thoracolumbar spine, the severity of disability increases with positive sagittal malalignment following surgical reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22653395     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826100c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  104 in total

1.  Three-column osteotomies of the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine: comparison of early outcomes, radiographic parameters, and peri-operative complications in 48 patients.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; Ehsan Tabaraee; Haruki Funao; Justin S Smith; Shane Burch; Bobby Tay; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Débridement and Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in Kyphotic Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Zhimin Pan; Jiaquan Luo; Limin Yu; Yiwei Chen; Junlong Zhong; Zhiyun Li; Zhaoxun Zeng; Pingguo Duan; Yoon Ha; Kai Cao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Cervical sagittal deformity develops after PJK in adult thoracolumbar deformity correction: radiographic analysis utilizing a novel global sagittal angular parameter, the CTPA.

Authors:  Themistocles Protopsaltis; Nicolas Bronsard; Alex Soroceanu; Jensen K Henry; Renaud Lafage; Justin Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  K-line tilt as a novel radiographic parameter in cervical sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Kim; Tae Hwan Kim; Moon Soo Park; Seok Woo Kim; Ho Geun Chang; Ji Hee Kim; Jun Hyong Ahn; In Bok Chang; Joon Ho Song; Jae Keun Oh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Kinematic characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance: a weight-bearing dynamic MRI study.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Phillip Grisdela; Joshua Romanu; Permsak Paholpak; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Normal sagittal profile of the cervical spine - must the cervical spine always be lordotic?]

Authors:  M Akbar; H Almansour; B Diebo; D Adler; W Pepke; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  An in vitro evaluation of sagittal alignment in the cervical spine after insertion of supraphysiologic lordotic implants.

Authors:  Donald J Blaskiewicz; Jeffrey E Harris; Patrick P Han; Alexander W Turner; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases.

Authors:  W Thompson; A Cogniet; M Challali; R Saddiki; J Rigal; Jean Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.