Literature DB >> 26273762

Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.

Christopher P Ames1, Justin S Smith2, Robert Eastlack3, Donald J Blaskiewicz3, Christopher I Shaffrey2, Frank Schwab4, Shay Bess5, Han Jo Kim6, Gregory M Mundis3, Eric Klineberg7, Munish Gupta7, Michael O'Brien8, Richard Hostin8, Justin K Scheer9, Themistocles S Protopsaltis4, Kai-Ming G Fu10, Robert Hart11, Todd J Albert12, K Daniel Riew13, Michael G Fehlings14, Vedat Deviren15, Virginie Lafage4.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Despite the complexity of cervical spine deformity (CSD) and its significant impact on patient quality of life, there exists no comprehensive classification system. The objective of this study was to develop a novel classification system based on a modified Delphi approach and to characterize the intra- and interobserver reliability of this classification.
METHODS: Based on an extensive literature review and a modified Delphi approach with an expert panel, a CSD classification system was generated. The classification system included a deformity descriptor and 5 modifiers that incorporated sagittal, regional, and global spinopelvic alignment and neurological status. The descriptors included: "C," "CT," and "T" for primary cervical kyphotic deformities with an apex in the cervical spine, cervicothoracic junction, or thoracic spine, respectively; "S" for primary coronal deformity with a coronal Cobb angle ≥ 15°; and "CVJ" for primary craniovertebral junction deformity. The modifiers included C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), horizontal gaze (chin-brow to vertical angle [CBVA]), T1 slope (TS) minus C2-7 lordosis (TS-CL), myelopathy (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] scale score), and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification for thoracolumbar deformity. Application of the classification system requires the following: 1) full-length standing posteroanterior (PA) and lateral spine radiographs that include the cervical spine and femoral heads; 2) standing PA and lateral cervical spine radiographs; 3) completed and scored mJOA questionnaire; and 4) a clinical photograph or radiograph that includes the skull for measurement of the CBVA. A series of 10 CSD cases, broadly representative of the classification system, were selected and sufficient radiographic and clinical history to enable classification were assembled. A panel of spinal deformity surgeons was queried to classify each case twice, with a minimum of 1 intervening week. Inter- and intrarater reliability measures were based on calculations of Fleiss k coefficient values.
RESULTS: Twenty spinal deformity surgeons participated in this study. Interrater reliability (Fleiss k coefficients) for the deformity descriptor rounds 1 and 2 were 0.489 and 0.280, respectively, and mean intrarater reliability was 0.584. For the modifiers, including the SRS-Schwab components, the interrater (round 1/round 2) and intrarater reliabilities (Fleiss k coefficients) were: C2-7 SVA (0.338/0.412, 0.584), horizontal gaze (0.779/0.430, 0.768), TS-CL (0.721/0.567, 0.720), myelopathy (0.602/0.477, 0.746), SRS-Schwab curve type (0.590/0.433, 0.564), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (0.554/0.386, 0.826), pelvic tilt (0.714/0.627, 0.633), and C7-S1 SVA (0.071/0.064, 0.233), respectively. The parameter with the poorest reliability was the C7-S1 SVA, which may have resulted from differences in interpretation of positive and negative measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification provides a mechanism to assess CSD within the framework of global spinopelvic malalignment and clinically relevant parameters. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities suggest moderate agreement and serve as the basis for subsequent improvement and study of the proposed classification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBVA = chin-brow to vertical angle; CL = cervical lordosis; CSD = cervical spine deformity; CVJ = craniovertebral junction; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; LL = lumbar lordosis; NDI = Neck Disability Index; PA = posteroanterior; PI = pelvic incidence; PT = pelvic tilt; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; SRS = Scoliosis Research Society; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; TS = T-1 slope; cervical spine deformity; classification; horizontal gaze; kyphosis; mJOA = modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale; myelopathy; sagittal alignment; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26273762     DOI: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  48 in total

1.  Kinematic characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance: a weight-bearing dynamic MRI study.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Phillip Grisdela; Joshua Romanu; Permsak Paholpak; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prospective multi-centric evaluation of upper cervical and infra-cervical sagittal compensatory alignment in patients with adult cervical deformity.

Authors:  Subaraman Ramchandran; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Daniel Sciubba; Justin K Scheer; Cyrus M Jalai; Alan Daniels; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Han Jo Kim; Gregory Mundis; Eric Klineberg; Robert A Hart; Justin S Smith; Christopher Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Compensatory modulation for severe global sagittal imbalance: significance of cervical compensation on quality of life in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Jin Qian; Yong Qiu; Bang-Ping Qian; Ze-Zhang Zhu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Three-column osteotomy for correction of cervical and cervicothoracic deformities: alignment changes and early complications in a multicenter prospective series of 23 patients.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Justin K Scheer; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Peter Passias; Gregory Mundis; Robert Hart; Brian Neuman; Eric Klineberg; Richard Hostin; Shay Bess; Vedat Deviren; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Rater Reliability of the Hardy Classification for Pituitary Adenomas in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Era.

Authors:  Michael A Mooney; Douglas A Hardesty; John P Sheehy; C Roger Bird; Kristina Chapple; William L White; Andrew S Little
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-06-07

8.  Extremely high preoperative C7 slope limits compensatory cervical lordosis after muscle-preserving selective laminectomy.

Authors:  Satoshi Nori; Tateru Shiraishi; Ryoma Aoyama; Ken Ninomiya; Junichi Yamane; Kazuya Kitamura; Seiji Ueda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Fixed cervical high-grade kyphosis : Chin-on-chest deformity-Treatment plan].

Authors:  H Koller; S Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.