PURPOSE: Deep learning has had success with MRI reconstruction, but previously published works use real-valued networks. The few works which have tried complex-valued networks have not fully assessed their impact on phase. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to fully investigate end-to-end complex-valued convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for accelerated MRI reconstruction and in several phase-based applications in comparison to 2-channel real-valued networks. METHODS: Several complex-valued activation functions for MRI reconstruction were implemented, and their performance was compared. Complex-valued convolution was implemented and tested on an unrolled network architecture and a U-Net-based architecture over a wide range of network widths and depths with knee, body, and phase-contrast datasets. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrated that complex-valued CNNs with complex-valued convolutions provided superior reconstructions compared to real-valued convolutions with the same number of trainable parameters for both an unrolled network architecture and a U-Net-based architecture, and for 3 different datasets. Complex-valued CNNs consistently had superior normalized RMS error, structural similarity index, and peak SNR compared to real-valued CNNs. CONCLUSION: Complex-valued CNNs can enable superior accelerated MRI reconstruction and phase-based applications such as fat-water separation, and flow quantification compared to real-valued convolutional neural networks.
PURPOSE: Deep learning has had success with MRI reconstruction, but previously published works use real-valued networks. The few works which have tried complex-valued networks have not fully assessed their impact on phase. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to fully investigate end-to-end complex-valued convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for accelerated MRI reconstruction and in several phase-based applications in comparison to 2-channel real-valued networks. METHODS: Several complex-valued activation functions for MRI reconstruction were implemented, and their performance was compared. Complex-valued convolution was implemented and tested on an unrolled network architecture and a U-Net-based architecture over a wide range of network widths and depths with knee, body, and phase-contrast datasets. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative results demonstrated that complex-valued CNNs with complex-valued convolutions provided superior reconstructions compared to real-valued convolutions with the same number of trainable parameters for both an unrolled network architecture and a U-Net-based architecture, and for 3 different datasets. Complex-valued CNNs consistently had superior normalized RMS error, structural similarity index, and peak SNR compared to real-valued CNNs. CONCLUSION: Complex-valued CNNs can enable superior accelerated MRI reconstruction and phase-based applications such as fat-water separation, and flow quantification compared to real-valued convolutional neural networks.
Authors: Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Feiyu Chen; Valentina Taviani; Itzik Malkiel; Joseph Y Cheng; Jonathan I Tamir; Jamil Shaikh; Stephanie T Chang; Christopher J Hardy; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Morteza Mardani; Enhao Gong; Joseph Y Cheng; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Greg Zaharchuk; Lei Xing; John M Pauly Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Olivier Jaubert; Javier Montalt-Tordera; Dan Knight; Gerry J Coghlan; Simon Arridge; Jennifer A Steeden; Vivek Muthurangu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 4.668