| Literature DB >> 33718671 |
Yan Hu1, Xiaoqun Li1, Qin Zhang2, Zhengrong Gu3, Ying Luo4, Jiawei Guo1, Xiuhui Wang2, Yingying Jing2, Xiao Chen1,5, Jiacan Su1.
Abstract
The differentiation shift from osteogenesis to adipogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) characterizes many pathological <span class="Disease">bone loss conditions. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF1) is highly enriched in the bone marrow for C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-positive hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) homing and tumor bone metastasis. In this study, we displayed CXCR4 on the surface of exosomes derived from genetically engineered NIH-3T3 cells. CXCR4+ exosomes selectively accumulated in the bone marrow. Then, we fused CXCR4+ exosomes with liposomes carrying antagomir-188 to produce hybrid nanoparticles (NPs). The hybrid NPs specifically gathered in the bone marrow and released antagomir-188, which promoted osteogenesis and inhibited adipogenesis of BMSCs and thereby reversed age-related trabecular bone loss and decreased cortical bone porosity in mice. Taken together, this study presents a novel way to obtain bone-targeted exosomes via surface display of CXCR4 and a promising anabolic therapeutic approach for age-related bone loss.Entities:
Keywords: Bone targeting; CXCR4; Exosomes; Osteoporosis; miR-188
Year: 2021 PMID: 33718671 PMCID: PMC7917458 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1Characterization of CXCR4+ exosomes. A) Schematic illustration of exosome-guided miRNA blocking. B) Schematic illustration of CXCR4+ exosomes construction. C) CXCR4 expression levels in NIH-3T3 cells (3T3) and CXCR4-expressing NIH-3T3 cells (3T3-R4) determined by RT-qPCR (p < 0.0001). D) Western blotting results of exosome markers (Tsg101, CD9, and CD63) and CXCR4 in 3T3-R4 exosomes. E) TEM results showing the classical bilayer structure (black arrow) of CXCR4+ exosomes (scale bar = 100 nm). F) NTA results demonstrating the size distribution of CXCR4+ exosomes.
Fig. 2exosomes. A) Fluorescence of organs from mice sacrificed 4h after intravenous injection of PBS, equivalent Cy5 dissolved in PBS, Cy5 labeled CXCR4- exosomes and Cy5 labeled CXCR4+ exosomes. B) Fluorescence intensity quantitation in organs (**p < 0.01).
Fig. 3Construction and description of hybrid NPs. A) Schematic description of exosome-liposome extrusion. B) Schematic illustration of FRET analysis. C) NBD ratio of the total fluorescence intensity indicates a membrane fusion process (***p < 0.001). n = 3 for each group). Representative TEM and NTA analyses are shown in D) and E) (scale bar = 100 nm).
Fig. 4hybrid NPs. A) Biophotonic images of the organ distribution 4h after intravenous injection of PBS, Cy5, Cy5 labeled liposomes and Cy5-labeled hybrid NPs, with various exosome-liposome ratios. B) Representative fluorescence microscopic images of the femur 1, 2, and 4 h after injection of Cy5-labeled CXCR4+ hybrid NPs (exosomes-liposomes ratio = 1:1; scale bars on the left, upper right, and bottom right represent 500 μm, 100 μm and 20 μm, respectively).
Fig. 5Hybrid NPs carrying antagomir-188 reverse aging-related bone loss. A) Representative micro-CT images of femora from the hybrid NPs, antagomir and hybrid NPs + antagomir groups. A sagittal section, a three-dimensional reconstruction of trabecular bone, and a horizontal section of cortical bone were presented in the left, upper right and bottom right, respectively. B) Representative images of FABP4 immunohistochemical staining of the distal femora, scale bar = 20 μm. C) Representative images of H&E staining of the distal femora. D) Quantification of FABP4 positive cells, scale bar = 20 μm. E) Quantification of bone lining cells. Statistic difference: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.