Literature DB >> 28608571

Effects of Denosumab and Teriparatide Transitions on Bone Microarchitecture and Estimated Strength: the DATA-Switch HR-pQCT study.

Joy N Tsai1, Kyle K Nishiyama2, David Lin1, Amy Yuan1, Hang Lee3, Mary L Bouxsein4, Benjamin Z Leder1.   

Abstract

In postmenopausal osteoporosis, switching from teriparatide to denosumab results in continued bone mineral density (BMD) gains whereas switching from denosumab to teriparatide results in BMD loss. To assess the effects of these transitions on bone microarchitecture and strength, we performed high-resolution peripheral QCT (HR-pQCT) at the distal tibia and radius in postmenopausal osteoporotic women who received 24 months of teriparatide 20 μg daily followed by 24 months of denosumab 60 mg every 6 months, 24 months of denosumab followed by 24 months of teriparatide, or 24 months of both medications followed by 24 months of denosumab. The 77 women who completed at least one post-switch visit are included in this analysis. Tibial cortical volumetric BMD (vBMD) increased between months 24 and 48 in the teriparatide-to-denosumab (net 48-month change -0.8% ± 2.4%) and combination-to-denosumab groups (net 48-month changes +2.4% ± 4.1%) but decreased in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group (net 48-month change -3.4% ± 3.2%, p < 0.001 for all between-group comparisons). Changes in total vBMD, cortical thickness, and estimated stiffness (by micro-finite element analysis [µFEA]) followed a similar pattern, as did changes at the radius. Conversely, tibial cortical porosity remained stable between months 24 and 48 in the teriparatide-to-denosumab and combination-to-denosumab groups (net 48-month changes +7.2% ± 14.8% and -3.4% ± 12.1%, respectively) but increased in the denosumab-to-teriparatide group (net 48-month change +16.2% ± 11.5%, p < 0.05 versus other groups). Trabecular vBMD changes did not differ among groups. Together, these findings demonstrate that in women treated with denosumab, switching to teriparatide is associated with a reduction in total and cortical vBMD, cortical thickness, and estimated strength, whereas switching to denosumab from teriparatide or combination therapy results in improvements in these parameters with the greatest improvements observed in women treated with combined therapy followed by denosumab. These findings strongly suggest that the use of teriparatide after denosumab should be avoided and that the use of combined teriparatide/denosumab followed by denosumab alone may be a useful treatment strategy in those with severe osteoporosis.
© 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANABOLICS; ANALYSIS/QUANTITATION OF BONE; ANTIRESORPTIVES; BONE QCT/μCT; CLINICAL TRIALS; DISEASES AND DISORDERS OF/RELATED TO BONE; OSTEOPOROSIS; THERAPEUTICS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28608571     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  17 in total

Review 1.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Using 3D image registration to maximize the reproducibility of longitudinal bone strength assessment by HR-pQCT and finite element analysis.

Authors:  R M Plett; T D Kemp; L A Burt; E O Billington; D A Hanley; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Optimizing HR-pQCT workflow: a comparison of bias and precision error for quantitative bone analysis.

Authors:  D E Whittier; A N Mudryk; I D Vandergaag; L A Burt; S K Boyd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  D E Whittier; S K Boyd; A J Burghardt; J Paccou; A Ghasem-Zadeh; R Chapurlat; K Engelke; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  RANKL as a target for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Toshio Matsumoto; Itsuro Endo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Anabolic Agents for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: How Do You Choose?

Authors:  Felicia Cosman; David W Dempster
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  T-Cell Mediated Inflammation in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Di Wu; Anna Cline-Smith; Elena Shashkova; Ajit Perla; Aditya Katyal; Rajeev Aurora
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Comparative effect of eldecalcitol and alfacalcidol on bone microstructure: A preliminary report of secondary analysis of a prospective trial.

Authors:  Xiaolin Ni; Juan Feng; Yan Jiang; Li Zhang; Wei Yu; Ou Wang; Mei Li; Xiaoping Xing; Toshio Matsumoto; Weibo Xia
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Differences in the effects of BMI on bone microstructure between loaded and unloaded bones assessed by HR-pQCT in Japanese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Norifumi Fujii; Manabu Tsukamoto; Nobukazu Okimoto; Miyuki Mori; Yoshiaki Ikejiri; Toru Yoshioka; Makoto Kawasaki; Nobuhiro Kito; Junya Ozawa; Ryoichi Nakamura; Shogo Takano; Saeko Fujiwara
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.