Literature DB >> 33717923

A review of plain radiographic methods for measuring femoral version after total hip arthroplasty and validation of modified Budin's method in Indian population.

Anurag Mittal1, Nitish Kumar2, Bobby Nandimandalam3, Amite Pankaj4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple plain radiographic methods; cross table radiographic method, modified Budin method, projected neck-shaft angle method, and trans lateral decubitus view method using Ogata-Goldsand formula, have been described in literature for measurement of femoral stem version (FSV) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
PURPOSE: To review these multiple radiographic methods and also determine validity and accuracy of modified Budin method in Indian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search for different methods described for FSV measurement was performed and these methods were reviewed. In addition, for validation of modified Budin method in Indian population, data was collected for 36 THAs prospectively. A posteroanterior radiograph with patient sitting in 90° hip flexion and 30° abduction was taken 3 weeks and 6 weeks after surgery for calculating the FSV using modified Budin method. At 3 weeks, a CT scan was also done for version measurement. Intra and interobserver reliability, and reproducibility of radiographic FSV measurement, and the correlation between CT scan and radiographic FSV measurement were statistically calculated.
RESULTS: All the reviewed studies demonstrated that their method is comparable to CT method for FSV measurement, except FSV measured on cross table radiographic view. However, there were only one or at most two studies of every method described except for modified Budin technique. The mean FSV in our prospective case series using 'modified Budin' method was 11.6° which was comparable to the mean of CT scan version measurement (12.3°). The mean difference was 0.7° which was not statistically significant (p value > 0.05). In addition, there was high intra-class correlation coefficient in radiographic FSV for both intra- and inter-observer reliability.
CONCLUSION: Multiple methods have been described and validated in literature, however, the 'modified Budin' view have proved multiple times to have excellent reliability and validity for easy measurement of FSV.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral stem version; Modified budin method; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33717923      PMCID: PMC7920004          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  19 in total

Review 1.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans.

Authors:  Debdut Biswas; Jesse E Bible; Michael Bohan; Andrew K Simpson; Peter G Whang; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anisha B Patel; Rohan R Wagle; Molly M Usrey; Matt T Thompson; Stephen J Incavo; Philip C Noble
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Weber; P Lechler; F von Kunow; F Völlner; A Keshmiri; A Hapfelmeier; J Grifka; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  The importance of adequate stem anteversion for rotational stability in cemented total hip replacement: a radiostereometric study with ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  S Kiernan; K L Hermann; P Wagner; L Ryd; G Flivik
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Reliability of a new method for evaluating femoral stem positioning after total hip arthroplasty based on stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction.

Authors:  Benjamin Guenoun; Firass El Hajj; David Biau; Philippe Anract; Jean-Pierre Courpied
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment.

Authors:  F Pierchon; G Pasquier; A Cotten; C Fontaine; J Clarisse; A Duquennoy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-01

8.  Radiographic Assessment of Femoral Stem Torsion in Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Comparison of a Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal Angle-Based Technique With the Budin View.

Authors:  Michael L Woerner; Markus Weber; Benjamin S Craiovan; H Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Tobias F Renkawitz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Measuring anteversion in the femoral neck from routine radiographs.

Authors:  K L Hermann; N Egund
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs.

Authors:  Philipp Lechler; Michael Frink; Aashish Gulati; David Murray; Tobias Renkawitz; Benjamin Bücking; Steffen Ruchholtz; Christoph Kolja Boese
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.