Literature DB >> 25161165

Reliability of a new method for evaluating femoral stem positioning after total hip arthroplasty based on stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction.

Benjamin Guenoun1, Firass El Hajj2, David Biau2, Philippe Anract2, Jean-Pierre Courpied2.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to validate a new method for determining femoral stem positioning based on 3D models derived from the EOS biplanar system. Independents observers measured stem anteversion and femoral offset using CT scan and EOS system of 28 femoral stems implanted in composite femurs. In parallel, the same parameters were measured on biplanar lower limb radiographs acquired from 30 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. CT scanner and biplanar X-ray measurements on composite femurs were highly correlated: 0.94 for femoral offset (P < 0.01), 0.98 for stem anteversion (P < 0.01). The inter and intra-observer reproducibility when measuring composite bones was excellent with both imaging modalities as when measuring femoral stem positioning in patients with the biplanar X-ray system.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOS biplanar X-ray system; analysis of radiographs; femur X-rays; reproducibility of results; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25161165     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Biplanar Low-Dose Radiography Is Accurate for Measuring Combined Anteversion After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christina I Esposito; Theodore T Miller; Joseph D Lipman; Kaitlin M Carroll; Douglas E Padgett; David J Mayman; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-02-05

2.  A review of plain radiographic methods for measuring femoral version after total hip arthroplasty and validation of modified Budin's method in Indian population.

Authors:  Anurag Mittal; Nitish Kumar; Bobby Nandimandalam; Amite Pankaj
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Accuracy of biplanar linear radiography versus conventional radiographs when used for lower limb and implant measurements.

Authors:  Chen Xi Kasia Chua; Si Heng Sharon Tan; Andrew Kean Seng Lim; James Hoipo Hui
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Validity of the EOS-determined pelvic parameters and orientation with pelvic positional variation: a phantom study.

Authors:  Jung-Taek Kim; Dong Hoon Lee; Han-Dong Lee; Han-Bit Shin; Bumhee Park; Sunghoon Park; Hyung Keun Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliabilities of Three-Dimensional Postoperative Evaluation Software in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenta Konno; Shigeo Hagiwara; Junichi Nakamura; Yuya Kawarai; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-09-16

6.  Assessing component orientation of total hip arthroplasty using the low-dose bi-planar radiographs.

Authors:  Zhuyi Ma; Hao Tang; Yixin Zhou; Siyuan Wang; Dejin Yang; Shaoyi Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations.

Authors:  Elias Melhem; Ayman Assi; Rami El Rachkidi; Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.548

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.