BACKGROUND: Correct assessment of femoral stem torsion is crucial in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to compare a recently published novel method based on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs using the projected caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle (AP CCD) with the modified posteroanterior Budin view. METHOD: AP radiographs, modified Budin views, and 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images were obtained in 30 patients after minimally invasive, cementless THA. Radiographic measurements performed by 4 observers twice in a 6-week interval were compared with 3D-CT measurements. Furthermore, correlations between the radiographic deviation to 3D-CT and patient specific characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: We found a mean difference of 2.2 ± 6.8° between AP CCD and 3D-CT measurements of femoral stem torsion and -0.5 ± 4.2° between the modified Budin view and 3D-CT. We found a high correlation between mean radiographic and 3D-CT stem torsion (r = 0.78, P < .001 for AP CCD and r = 0.84, P < .001 for Budin view). The observers had excellent agreements within (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.88 for AP CCD and intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.94 for Budin view) and between (mean concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.79 for AP CCD and concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.86 for Budin view) their radiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: Both radiographic methods enable a simple orientation and a practical conventional radiographic estimation of stem torsion on hip radiographs after THA. However, CT remains the golden standard for exact estimation of stem torsion.
BACKGROUND: Correct assessment of femoral stem torsion is crucial in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to compare a recently published novel method based on anteroposterior (AP) hip radiographs using the projected caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle (AP CCD) with the modified posteroanterior Budin view. METHOD: AP radiographs, modified Budin views, and 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images were obtained in 30 patients after minimally invasive, cementless THA. Radiographic measurements performed by 4 observers twice in a 6-week interval were compared with 3D-CT measurements. Furthermore, correlations between the radiographic deviation to 3D-CT and patient specific characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: We found a mean difference of 2.2 ± 6.8° between AP CCD and 3D-CT measurements of femoral stem torsion and -0.5 ± 4.2° between the modified Budin view and 3D-CT. We found a high correlation between mean radiographic and 3D-CT stem torsion (r = 0.78, P < .001 for AP CCD and r = 0.84, P < .001 for Budin view). The observers had excellent agreements within (intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.88 for AP CCD and intraclass correlation coefficient, ≥0.94 for Budin view) and between (mean concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.79 for AP CCD and concordance correlation coefficient, ≥0.86 for Budin view) their radiographic measurements. CONCLUSION: Both radiographic methods enable a simple orientation and a practical conventional radiographic estimation of stem torsion on hip radiographs after THA. However, CT remains the golden standard for exact estimation of stem torsion.