Literature DB >> 16139710

Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects.

Matthew C Nadaud1, William L Griffin, Thomas K Fehring, J Bohannon Mason, Owen B Tabor, Susan Odum, Donna S Nussman.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the difficult reconstructive challenge of severe proximal femoral bone loss. We present intermediate-term results of 46 hips with extensive proximal femoral bone loss that underwent revision total hip arthroplasty using cementless distal fixation without supplemental allograft. All were evaluated with the Harris hip score at a minimum of 2 years. Radiographs were assessed using the Engh fixation scale. At a mean of 6.4 (range 2-12) years, 43 of the 46 prostheses were functioning well. Two patients required revision for symptomatic loosening, and 1 prosthesis remains radiographically loose with a fair clinical score. Mean Harris hip score was 77 at last follow-up. There were 6 intraoperative femur fractures, 9 dislocations, 10 cases of severe stress shielding, and no infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139710     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Rosário Madero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Matthew Tetreault; Cara A Cipriano; Craig J Della Valle; Wayne Paprosky; Scott Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  High survival of modular tapered stems for proximal femoral bone defects at 5 to 10 years followup.

Authors:  Andrew P Van Houwelingen; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Nelson V Greidanus; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Distal fixation stems for revision of total hip replacement.

Authors:  Fernando Lopreite; Leonel Perez Alamino; Harold Simesen de Bielke; German Garabano; Hernán Del Sel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-21

6.  Proximal Femoral Bone Regeneration After an Uncemented Hydroxyapatite-coated Long-stem in Revision Hip Surgery.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  Fracture of cobalt chrome, fully-coat beaded femoral revision long stem, a clinical outcomes study.

Authors:  Chih-Hsiang Chang; Po-Chun Lin; Cheng-Min Shih; Chun-Chieh Chen; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Hsin-Nung Shih
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING A MODULAR CEMENTLESS DISTAL FIXATION PROSTHESIS: THE ZMR(®) HIP SYSTEM. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF 30 CASES.

Authors:  Richard Prazeres Canella; Paulo Gilberto Cimbalista de Alencar; Gerson Gandhi Ganev; Luiz Fernando de Vincenzi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17

9.  Bone restoration after revision hip arthroplasty with femoral bone defects using extensively porous-coated stems with cortical strut allografts.

Authors:  Zichuan Ding; Tingxian Ling; Ping Mou; Duan Wang; Kai Zhou; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Downsizing in total hip arthroplasty. A short stem as a revision implant.

Authors:  Marcel Coutandin; Yama Afghanyar; Philipp Rehbein; Jens Dargel; Philipp Drees; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.087

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.