Literature DB >> 33711996

High conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty in young patients with a minimum 10 years follow-up.

Nam Hoon Moon1, Won Chul Shin2, Min Uk Do3, Sang Woo Kang3, Sang-Min Lee3, Kuen Tak Suh3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the follow-up results of bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) for more than 10 years in patients aged < 60 years and to analyze the risk factors for acetabular erosion after BHA.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 114 patients who underwent BHA were followed-up for at least 10 years. The mean age was 54.1 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 13.8 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of acetabular erosion, and the preoperative parameters were compared between the two groups. Moreover, the risk factors related to acetabular erosion after BHA were analyzed using statistical comparisons.
RESULTS: Reoperation was performed in 44 of the 114 patients (38.6 %). The survival rate when the end point was reoperation related to acetabular erosion was found to be significantly time-dependent: 73.2 % at 5 years, 48.8 % at 10 years, and 25.9 % at 15 years. The acetabular erosion group showed significantly younger age at the time of surgery, higher body mass index (BMI), more avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and smaller prosthetic femoral head. The final multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that young age at the time of surgery were independent risk factors for acetabular erosion after BHA in patients aged < 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The minimum 10-year follow-up outcomes of BHA in patients aged < 60 years showed a relatively high conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty. When considering BHA in younger patients, more careful decisions should be made with respect to patient's choice, keeping in mind that long-term survival cannot be guaranteed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular erosion; Hemiarthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty; Young patient

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33711996      PMCID: PMC7955647          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04153-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  22 in total

1.  Low conversion rates toward total hip arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty in patients under 75 years of age.

Authors:  P P Schmitz; J L C van Susante; M P Somford
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-19

2.  A retrospective study of Moore and Thompson hemiarthroplasty. A review of 599 surgical cases and an analysis of the technical complications.

Authors:  D C Kwok; R L Cruess
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  How Often Do Acetabular Erosions Occur After Bipolar Hip Endoprostheses in Patients With Malignant Tumors and Are Erosions Associated With Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Peter S Rose; Peter C Ferguson; Franklin H Sim; Anthony M Griffin; Mario Hevesi; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Hip fractures in the non-elderly-Who, why and whither?

Authors:  Cecilia Rogmark; Morten Tange Kristensen; Bjarke Viberg; Sebastian Strøm Rönnquist; Søren Overgaard; Henrik Palm
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients aged 70 years and over.

Authors:  M P J van den Bekerom; E F Hilverdink; I N Sierevelt; E M B P Reuling; J M Schnater; H Bonke; J C Goslings; C N van Dijk; E L F B Raaymakers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-10

6.  Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients.

Authors:  J F Keating; A Grant; M Masson; N W Scott; J F Forbes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  High dislocation cumulative risk in THA versus hemiarthroplasty for fractures.

Authors:  Alexandre Poignard; Mohamed Bouhou; Olivier Pidet; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Long-term results of bipolar hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip and idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Makoto Muraki; Akihiro Sudo; Masahiro Hasegawa; Aki Fukuda; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Hemiarthroplasty of the hip for fracture-what is the appropriate sized femoral head?

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yuval Ran; Mark I Loebenberg; Yaron Bar Ziv
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Thompson hemiarthroplasty and acetabular erosion.

Authors:  T W Phillips
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.